Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Jawdropping: Oldest human fossil fills in a 2.8-million-year-old gap in evolution||
|Why aren't other Windows tablets/hybrids (besides the Surface) selling?||
|Neowin.net Minecraft Server||
|If S6 fails then Flagship is dead for Android||
|Need some help from someone with Raspberry experience.||
Posted 24 January 2013 - 16:41
Posted 24 January 2013 - 16:45
Posted 25 January 2013 - 02:01
Tell us, how does it differ?....
Posted 25 January 2013 - 02:14
Posted 25 January 2013 - 19:41
Posted 25 January 2013 - 22:38
Posted 25 January 2013 - 23:12
Ok, there is just a disturbing line in the article.
Anyone who commits an act of sexual penetration on, or has sexual contact with, human remains without lawful authority is guilty of a felony, according to the California Health and Safety Code.
Does that mean there IS lawful authority?
Posted 25 January 2013 - 23:15
Actually didn't I read not that long ago that some country changed the law so that husbands could have sex with their dead wives up to 3 hours after death or something similar ?