Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Baidu sucks compared with Yahoo and Google||
|Family of Toddler Injured by SWAT 'Grenade' Faces $1M in Medical Bills||
|Microsoft to block Classic Shell in Windows 10: here is why||
|Trying to read a specific file crashes my RAID card||
|US firm finds Afghan government websites to be infected by Chinese malware||
Posted 24 January 2013 - 16:41
Posted 24 January 2013 - 16:45
Posted 25 January 2013 - 02:01
Tell us, how does it differ?....
Posted 25 January 2013 - 02:14
Posted 25 January 2013 - 19:41
Posted 25 January 2013 - 22:38
Posted 25 January 2013 - 23:12
Ok, there is just a disturbing line in the article.
Anyone who commits an act of sexual penetration on, or has sexual contact with, human remains without lawful authority is guilty of a felony, according to the California Health and Safety Code.
Does that mean there IS lawful authority?
Posted 25 January 2013 - 23:15
Actually didn't I read not that long ago that some country changed the law so that husbands could have sex with their dead wives up to 3 hours after death or something similar ?