Jump to content



Photo

Is an SSD Drive even worth it?


  • Please log in to reply
158 replies to this topic

#151 Fahim S.

Fahim S.

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 15-April 02
  • OS: Windows 8 - OG
  • Phone: Google Nexus 4 16GB by LG

Posted 23 February 2013 - 19:03

I didn't considered the mechanical advantages, on that you are right... on another note, I already have a SDD (Samnsung 830) and it's great but it's not the definitive solution to everything, considering that they have a very short life span against a "well taken care of" HDD. I still however say that once loading times are done... there is noting much faster that the RAM where the current data is after loading.



Yes and no, please do not affirm things that are not entirely true.


Systems don't just load everything into memory at startup and then not write anything to disk until they shut down - therefore you are never operating entirely in RAM - I'm afraid that is absolutely entirely irrefutable.

Nobody claimed that an SSD was a panacea - the only claim made in this thread is that they are better performing than spinning platter drives, noticably across the whole system.


#152 xWhiplash

xWhiplash

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 23 February 2013 - 19:09

What is so hard about getting a SSD for the OS and Programs, and get a mechanical HDD for storage?

Win.....Win.....

All the people here complaining about not enough space in SSDs for the money, you do realize you can get both right? Even if you have a laptop and have only one internal connection, you obviously do not care about crazy speed so a USB External 1TB HDD will work for your storage needs.

So....getting an SSD is an add-on because people cannot manage computers properly? Really? We did not write the OS and programs, we do not control the disk IO for those programs. ANY disk IO is better with an SSD.

Really, SSDs have short life compared to well taken care of HDDs? Yes, they have a limit on how much you can use, but HDDs are not guaranteed to last years and years. I have one HDD that is 10 years old. But I have had one HDD that died ONE MONTH after purchase.

Anything that requires mechanical parts can fail at any time.

#153 dead.cell

dead.cell

    My Body My Temple

  • Joined: 09-July 04
  • Location: Houston, TX
  • OS: Win 7 Pro / Win 8 Pro
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S5 Active

Posted 23 February 2013 - 19:20

What amazes me is how 90% of the people in this thread can be saying that SSD is significantly better and that there's still a few folks who insist that it only improves boot times.

If you boot your PC and literally do NOTHING with it aside from read email and go on Facebook then yes, there will probably very little improvement for you. If you do ANYTHING that is IO intensive, then you will notice a significant speed boost.

Moving Battlefield 3 from my 1TB mechanical drive onto the SSD improved my loading times by something in the order of 6x.. it went from taking about a minute to load the game, to about 10 seconds. Similarly loading any big application (like Photoshop) only takes seconds, and doing anything IO intensive like crunching large video files or audio files will take significantly less time.


Answered all the questions I was going to ask, thanks! (Y)

#154 +Chicane-UK

Chicane-UK

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 02-November 01
  • Location: The UK!
  • OS: MacOS 10.9 Mavericks
  • Phone: Google Nexus 4

Posted 23 February 2013 - 19:23

Answered all the questions I was going to ask, thanks! (Y)


Glad I could help :)

#155 vetthe evn show

the evn show

    Removed

  • Joined: 10-June 02

Posted 23 February 2013 - 20:24

Removed

#156 MorganX

MorganX

    MegaZilla™

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 16-June 04
  • Location: Midwest USA
  • OS: Digita Storm Bolt, Windows 8.1 x64 Pro w/Media Center Pack, Server 2k12 - Core i7 3770K/16GB DDR3/OCZ Vector 256GB/Gigabyte GTX 760
  • Phone: HTC One 64GB

Posted 23 February 2013 - 20:34

Systems don't just load everything into memory at startup and then not write anything to disk until they shut down - therefore you are never operating entirely in RAM - I'm afraid that is absolutely entirely irrefutable.

Nobody claimed that an SSD was a panacea - the only claim made in this thread is that they are better performing than spinning platter drives, noticably across the whole system.


I agree with that. Right now that is a physical reality.

#157 Arceles

Arceles

    Time Craymel

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 28-November 09
  • Location: 4th dimmension.
  • OS: Win 7 Ultimate / Win 8.1 Pro (With Start Menu Start8, otherwise is UNUSABLE) / Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean
  • Phone: XT890 Motorola RAZRi (x86 processor)

Posted 23 February 2013 - 21:01

If you're building "hello world" 3-file applications then sure: there's no gain. The difference in build time for the full android source on a fast raid set of SSDs vs a typical enthusiast 7200 RPM drive set is measured in hours! A full build of vim or ruby or apache goes from ~10mins down to a 1.5 minutes. If you've got good test coverage and proper mocking then it can reduce your TDD turn around time from 15-45 seconds to 3-5 seconds.

Compiling and testing software is one of the best ways to demonstrate how awesome SSDs are because it's all random access to thousands of tiny files.


Nah... not hello worlds, particle filtering, while not too extensive code... I still need enough power.

#158 TheExperiment

TheExperiment

    Reality Bomb

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • Location: Everywhere
  • OS: 8.1 x64

Posted 23 February 2013 - 21:55

One thing no one in here has mentioned that I've noticed is random access.

Fragmented files on a HD get read as slow as .1 megs a second (so much for benchmarking at 90+ eh?) where on a decent SSD it's likely to be 80/90 megs a second

Sequential is obviously much faster on either, but with the SSD you don't have to constantly defrag it to keep that speed up.

#159 hagjohn

hagjohn

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 20-July 03
  • Location: Pennsylvania
  • OS: Windows 8.1, OSX 10.6
  • Phone: Nokia 1020 8.1

Posted 23 February 2013 - 22:15

Of course they are worth it. I have a 120G SSD for the OS and program and a hard drive for storage.