• 0

Mysql error help


Question

G'day All,

First off, if this is in the wrong forum, could a mod move it to the correct one.

I was bored and thought I'd have a go at some php. I have no real idea what I'm doing but thought I'd start learning from a script I already had.

In this function, the line mysql_data_seek($sql,$row) throws up the following error.

Warning: mysql_data_seek(): Offset 2 is invalid for MySQL result index 8 (or the query data is unbuffered)


function traverse($root, $depth, $sql)
{
$row=0;
while ($acat = mysql_fetch_array($sql))
{
if ($acat['parentcat'] == $root)
{
echo "<option value='" . $acat['catID'] . "'>";
$j=0;
while ($j<$depth)
{
echo "  ";
$j++;
}
if($depth>0)
{
echo "-";
}
echo $acat['catname'] . "</option>";

mysql_data_seek($sql,0);
traverse($acat['catID'], $depth+1,$sql);
}
$row++;
mysql_data_seek($sql,$row);
}
}
[/CODE]

Any help on this would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1137886-mysql-error-help/
Share on other sites

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've never used mysql_data_seek before (and neither should you because it's depreciated (as are all mysql_xxx functions) and will disappear in a future version of PHP, instead use mysqli or better yet PDO), but at a guess I'd say you're receiving this warning because you're trying to seek to a row that doesn't exist in the result.

You may not have seen that warning before if the code has been used in a production server because warnings are usually turned off so users don't see them.

You could use mysql_num_rows to get the number of rows in the result and only call mysql_data_seek if it's not outside the number of rows available.

function traverse($root, $depth, $sql)
{
  $num_rows = mysql_num_rows($sql);
  ...
  if ($row &lt; $num_rows)
	mysql_data_seek($sql,$row);

You could also call mysql_data_seek with at @ infront of it to suppress the error message.

$row++;
@mysql_data_seek($sql,$row);

  • 0

I've never used mysql_data_seek before (and neither should you because it's depreciated (as are all mysql_xxx functions) and will disappear in a future version of PHP, instead use mysqli or better yet PDO), but at a guess I'd say you're receiving this warning because you're trying to seek to a row that doesn't exist in the result.

You may not have seen that warning before if the code has been used in a production server because warnings are usually turned off so users don't see them.

You could use mysql_num_rows to get the number of rows in the result and only call mysql_data_seek if it's not outside the number of rows available.

You're right Virtorio, the script is from about 2006 I think. :D

As I said, I have no real idea of what I'm doing and after a few searches came to the conclusion that the error is generated for the reason you stated.

I did try and use mysql_num_rows, but couldn't work out how to put it in the correct place.

Where would be a good tutorial to rewrite the function in the correct manner?

Thank you for the quick reply as well. :)

  • 0

So, this is looping over a set of records that correspond to a hierarchical data structure stored using the Adjacency Model, printing them out in an indented fashion.

All records are gone through, looking for direct children of a given node, which for each one identified is printed and the function recalled to print its own direct children and so on. Each printing of a nodes children must loop through the entire result set from scratch looking for them, hence why the pointer is set back to 0 prior to calling the function to get its children. After getting its children printed, it needs to reset the pointer to the next record it is supposed to be moving on to. Here is where there's a flaw.

It's incrementing the variable that keeps track of where the pointer should be pointing to, so that it should be pointing to the next record, and then setting the pointer to it. However, upon having processed the last record in the set, the pointer is incremented to one greater than the index of the last item (itself) and therefore trying to set the pointer to it fails. A simple off by one bug.

All you should need to do is switch the order of the last two statements. Set the pointer to the current record, then increment $row. If mysql_fetch_array works how I think it works (I've never messed with setting the index pointer myself), the call to it will itself increment its pointer and fetch the next row, if there is one.

Furthermore, I'd set default values on the root and depth parameters if I were you, it'll make it simpler to use, by just calling traverse($sql);

function traverse($sql, $root = null, $depth = 0)
{
	$row = 0;
	while ($acat = mysql_fetch_array($sql))
	{
		if ($acat['parentcat'] == $root)
		{
			echo "&lt;option value='" . $acat['catID'] . "'&gt;";
			$j = 0;
			while ($j &lt; $depth) {
				echo "  ";
				$j++;
			}
			 if ($depth &gt; 0) {
				echo "-";
			}
			echo $acat['catname'] . "&lt;/option&gt;";

			mysql_data_seek($sql, 0);
			traverse($sql, $acat['catID'], $depth + 1);
		}
		mysql_data_seek($sql, $row);
		$row++;
	}
}

  • 0

Thank you to both Virtorio and +theblazingangel.

Tried what you suggested +theblazingangel, got rid of that error but threw up a different one. :)

Did what you suggested Virtorio and that worked a treat.

Thank you both very much.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!