Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Apple iPhone 6 bends, causing a second degree burn on man's leg||
|Windows Technical Preview||
|Stop thinking in binary Desktop vs. Tablet UI design||
|Jimquisition: Ubisoft Talks Bollocks About Framerate And Resolution||
|Computer unable to detect the home wifi||
Posted 25 February 2013 - 00:24
Everything isn't an attack Javic, all the article implies is INSTEAD of destroying it, give it to the people that want it/need it. Its not forced, its an option saying IF you want it, have it for free. Flip the perception for a sec, it can be said "the rich are not allowed to get it for free since its meant for people in need" So some rich person could be saying "I'm sick of hearing right wing fascists trying to give us all stick just because we are rich."
Everyone should have the right to choose what they eat, even poor people. I'm sick of hearing right wing fascists trying to give us all stick just because we aren't rich.
Posted 25 February 2013 - 03:23
while pigs, rabbits, squirrels, bears, dogs, cats, camels and horses are not.
Posted 25 February 2013 - 13:58
There's a saying: Beggars can't be choosers. If you're desperate enough, you'll eat about anything. I know this from experience.
Posted 25 February 2013 - 14:28
Why? There's plenty to go around so why should people be forced to when there's no actual need for it?
Posted 25 February 2013 - 14:33
Feed it to animals if it isnt good enough for humans.
Posted 26 February 2013 - 01:12
The odds are, ALL have eaten horse.Vegeterians excused.
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:07
on the other hand, why shouldn't they be given the option of cheap horsemeat ? it's better for you, many peopel say it tastes better and, well it's meat.
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:11
As long as its optional, clearly labeled, and checked to make sure its clean of drugs and disease I am OK with that
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:26