37 replies to this topic

[Hum]

Growled, on 05 March 2013 - 01:23, said:

That is one sexy car. Out of my price range, of course.

Just think of the insurance cost.

[Enron]

ahhell, on 05 March 2013 - 14:26, said:

The new Lambo is WAY too busy. Whatever happened to sleek and streamlined?

You have to admit, it would match a Vertu phone perfectly... both in relative price and style.

Hum, on 05 March 2013 - 23:40, said:

Just think of the insurance cost.

Nevermind that, I couldn't even afford to put gas in it.

[sanctified]

moloko, on 05 March 2013 - 22:00, said:

Young. I am almost 40. LOL.

Then I have bad news for you.

moloko, on 05 March 2013 - 22:00, said:

Young. I am almost 40. LOL. Have you seen a Verron or even sat in one. It is crap but it is a modern engineering marvel. This lambo is out there. It is like a jet fighter. With only three being made it is highly unlikely they will even be driven. They will go into the collectors showroom.

When I said design I meant industrial design, not engineering design. And, as I said, this is over engineered. It's a capitalist plaything. Not really functional.

This might go to a showroom indeed, but it will never be more iconic and well-remembered as the best designed car ever:

[Razorwing]

Looks like it could be a batmobile. lol.

[Dushmany]

When will it become available on Need for Speed; Most wanted??????

tsupersonic, on 05 March 2013 - 13:40, said:

Wow that is hideous - the front and back is overly over designed for the sake of over design. This seriously looks like something a 10 year old would design.

For the most part I agree with you, but isn't that the point of a Lambo?

[Torolol]

it look nice, but the front loook likes dust chowder,
atleast that what i've in mind when i tried envision it running the dusty nevada desert.

[PeteDaCoder]

Wow, that price is amazingly high - how do people ever have enough cashflow to own these cars?

[Semtex]

IMO, this don't look so good