Jump to content

31 posts in this topic

Posted

[quote name='Neobond' timestamp='1362690852' post='595564774']
SWAMP. GAS.
[/quote]

Keep it down! The swamp monster will hear you! :rofl:
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='Tyler R.' timestamp='1362691188' post='595564790']
Keep it down! The swamp monster will hear you! :rofl:
[/quote]

[size=1]swamp gas[/size]
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='Tyler R.' timestamp='1362691188' post='595564790']
Keep it down! The swamp monster will hear you! :rofl:
[/quote]
[quote name='Neobond' timestamp='1362691364' post='595564796']
[size=1]swamp gas[/size]
[/quote]

[img]http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/6058/swampgas.jpg[/img]
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The three dots are at no discernible distance they could be on the camera lens or thousands of miles away its not possible to say as the definition is so poor.They do however disappear from the screen at around the same time [01:17] before they reach the edge of the space station structure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='Hum' timestamp='1362686355' post='595564624']
UFO also does not mean that it was [i]not[/i] an alien craft. ;)


[b] UFO[/b]
[yoo-ef-oh or, sometimes, yoo-foh]

[color=#333333]noun,[/color] [color=#333333]plural[/color] [color=#333333]UFO's,[/color] UFOs.
any unexplained moving [url="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/object"]object[/url] observed in the sky, especially one assumed by some observers to be [color=#333333]of[/color] [color=#333333]extraterrestrial[/color] [color=#333333]origin.[/color]

[url="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/UFO?s=t"]http://dictionary.re.../browse/UFO?s=t[/url]
[/quote]



By that logic is could mean it's a giant flying nyan cat too. :/


FTR the definition you posted, you should make note of this part "[b]especially one[color=#ff0000] assumed[/color] by some observers[/b] to be [color=#333333]of[/color] [color=#333333]extraterrestrial[/color] [color=#333333]origin",bold and highlighted red for the important part. Assuming it's of [/color][color=#333333]extraterrestrial[/color] [color=#333333] [/color][color=#333333]origin doesn't not equate that a logical view should be to jump to that "[b]assumption[/b]" without actual evidence. You know the stuff that has yet to actually exist. :rolleyes:[/color]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think the issue is here is the suggestion it is something of interest. UFO sites always put up these types of images/video and it is obvious they are trying to imply it is something E.T.


If they thought it was space debris... [size=1]or swamp gas... [/size]they wouldn't bother posting it. Posting "UFO sighted outside of ISS" sounds more interesting than "bits of space **** floating past ISS doesn't even phase astronauts."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.