Jump to content
Posted 26 March 2013 - 22:38
Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:50
I simply from a bandwidth point of view do not see the need to diabled IPv6. From a security point of view, of course.
Others might disable it because of a misperception that having both IPv4 and IPv6 enabled effectively doubles their DNS and Web traffic. This is not true.
Posted 27 March 2013 - 15:36
Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:04
Posted 27 March 2013 - 22:47
Well, there was a object basically called "WAN" then any then "WAN1_PPP". I tried any as I literally wanted it to come from anywhere but that didnt work out. Later I believe I either tried WAN (which is a service group containing WAN1_PPP, WAN2_PPP etc) or WAN1_PPP. One of those as source did it so....
"I finally got it to work by tinkering around."
I wince every time I hear something like this - what did you do? You need to understand what was wrong.. not just randomly trying ****.
Posted 28 March 2013 - 00:43
Posted 28 March 2013 - 01:45
Posted 30 March 2013 - 17:42
Posted 30 March 2013 - 20:42
Posted 30 March 2013 - 20:44
Hey pes2013 !!
Listen to BudMan,,
he has really good advice, he has helped me out of a jam once or twice as well. and I have been running networks since before windows was a household name.
Posted 30 March 2013 - 21:18
"The wireless clients are MACed controll and WEP"
So completely open to anyone that can google then Since both are completely and utterly useless as security measures.
Posted 02 April 2013 - 07:54
Posted 02 April 2013 - 13:03
Posted 02 April 2013 - 13:42
Its enabled out of the box.
Did you read the article I pointed out saying that there are some built in programs that if IPv6 is disabled on W7, could break normal operations???
And our DC is Windows Small Business Server 2003