Jump to content



Photo

Deep Silver announces Saints Row IV for August 2013

deep silver saints row 4

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#16 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 16 March 2013 - 19:02

Yes and no. It was well-optimised and had decent graphics but the problem with it was that a lot of the cutscenes were pre-rendered at console quality (720p, low resolution graphics, no anti-aliasing, etc) and it was incredible jarring going from 2560x1600 maxed out to ultra-low res 720p. At first I thought the game was broken.

I believe the game was also loading assets in the background during those cutscenes.


#17 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 17,965 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic

Posted 16 March 2013 - 19:04

I believe the game was also loading assets in the background during those cutscenes.


And I can completely understand the necessity of that on consoles but there's no excuse for it on PC.

#18 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 16 March 2013 - 19:08

And I can completely understand the necessity of that on consoles but there's no excuse for it on PC.

Err? The majority of people still use hard drives, and the assets on PC are much better quality.

I rather disagree.

#19 OP compl3x

compl3x

    cui bono

  • 9,918 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7 HP
  • Phone: Galaxy S4

Posted 16 March 2013 - 19:15

I can't find an official Mafia III announcement.

#20 game_over

game_over

    Just below average Joe

  • 6,610 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 04
  • Location: England

Posted 16 March 2013 - 19:27

Anyone else find that trailer incredibly annoying to watch?

#21 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 17,965 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic

Posted 16 March 2013 - 19:34

Err? The majority of people still use hard drives, and the assets on PC are much better quality.

I rather disagree.


Games like Far Cry 3 and Skyrim do just fine without the need for constant loading screens. And even if one were to accept that the pre-rendered cutscenes were required—which I don't—there is absolutely NO excuse for them being such pathetically low quality. Most YouTube videos are higher quality, which really is saying something. They were used to mask the performance limitations of consoles and should have been rendered in-game on PC.

#22 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 16 March 2013 - 21:05

Games like Far Cry 3 and Skyrim do just fine without the need for constant loading screens. And even if one were to accept that the pre-rendered cutscenes were required—which I don't—there is absolutely NO excuse for them being such pathetically low quality. Most YouTube videos are higher quality, which really is saying something. They were used to mask the performance limitations of consoles and should have been rendered in-game on PC.

Skyrim sure has high quality assets yeahhhhh

(and IIRC the only cutscenes in FC3 at all were the intro and ending, don't know though.)

#23 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 17,965 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic

Posted 16 March 2013 - 21:26

Skyrim sure has high quality assets yeahhhhh

(and IIRC the only cutscene in FC3 at all was the intro, don't know though.)


Far Cry 3 had plenty of cutscenes and had much better graphics, all without needing to use pre-rendered cutscenes. And you deliberately ignored the other part of my post.

#24 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 16 March 2013 - 21:28

And you deliberately ignored the other part of my post.

I do ignore what I couldn't care less about, true.