Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Gunman killed after shooting 2 officers at Minnesota city hall||
|Meet Vivaldi, a new browser from the former CEO of Opera||
|New aquarium setup (freshwater)||
|Is Microsoft ignoring the desktop again?||
Posted 22 March 2013 - 22:33
Posted 22 March 2013 - 22:42
No he wouldn't. The reason he's mad at Bush was because he was sent to fight a POINTLESS war that served NO purpose. The Iraq war had nothing to do with national security and didn't benefit the US or it's taxpayers in anyway except shoving us even deeper in debt.
He should blame himself for signing up. If Bush put the gun to his head and made him to do it, then he could blame on Bush. The Army is not vacation that you can choose where to go. If he did get sent to Afghanistan, and got injury the same way, he would still blame Bush.
Posted 25 March 2013 - 13:58
I dont feel that way at all. I feel that since he chose to fight for this country then he needs to accept what he was asked to do. I hold veterans to a higher standard and I respect them more than anyone else I come across in my day to day life. As othes have said, if he came back with no injuries he'd be singing a different tune.
LOL.... golden. The people calling him a "crybaby" etc are the same people that wouldn't lift a finger to help their own country. This man is a War vet, a hero and has seen **** that 99% of people on neowin can't even imagine... but they sure can criticize him.
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:03
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:08
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:10
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:25
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:28
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:29
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:34
He escalated it?
Can all the soldiers injured in Afghanistan trash Obama with support from the same people who approve this letter since he supported that war from the beginning and escalated it after he became President or does it only go one way?
Posted 25 March 2013 - 17:20
He escalated it?
Either way, the letter is addressed to those who sent him, isn't it. I don't think it's necessarily "politically biased"
Posted 25 March 2013 - 17:22