Jump to content



Photo

New Youtube Front Page?

youtube

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 tanjiajun_34

tanjiajun_34

    Neowinian

  • 1,075 posts
  • Joined: 14-June 10

Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:03

Not sure. I never seen my Youtube front page looks like this. It changed today? Sorry if it is not news... :(
New Youtube.png


#2 shozilla

shozilla

    Neowinian Senior

  • 9,872 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 09

Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:13

I have that layout for awhile now.

#3 Pupik

Pupik

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,250 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 05

Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:19

I'd rather they increase the bitrate on the 720p and 1080p videos. It saddens me that the option for 1080p is there, but when you select it you get ****ty quality that destroy the whole purpose of HD. Details are lost in all the fuzzy pixels: http://i.imgur.com/a5WeGZw.jpg (was to lazy to crop the image, so second monitor is still there. Sorry).

#4 f0rk_b0mb

f0rk_b0mb

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,521 posts
  • Joined: 02-June 12

Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:24

Didn't get that layout yesterday when I was on. :)

#5 Damien R.

Damien R.

    XXX

  • 121,656 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 8.1 x64
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy

Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:25

I have that layout for awhile now.


Yeah same, also the new channel pages as well

#6 torrentthief

torrentthief

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,745 posts
  • Joined: 18-November 06

Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:26

I'd rather they increase the bitrate on the 720p and 1080p videos.


Not going to happen! I'm sure within 12 months there will be VP9 encoded videos which will look better than the current h.264 encoded videos and will use less bandwidth.

#7 Pupik

Pupik

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,250 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 05

Posted 27 March 2013 - 16:33

Not going to happen! I'm sure within 12 months there will be VP9 encoded videos which will look better than the current h.264 encoded videos and will use less bandwidth.

Speaking of h.264, I was reading about h.265 a few ago and it looked like a really good improvement in quality. Too bad I also read that it will take at least three years for it to properly be supported in browsers (flash or html5) after it will be finished.