25 posts in this topic

Posted

A California official is bringing new life to the argument that the Internet -- including emails -- is an untapped revenue resource that should be taxed to help local economies.

Berkeley City Councilman Gordon Wozniak brought up taxing emails during a recent council meeting. He suggested the money collected, which would be part of a wider-reaching Internet tax, could be used in Berkeley's case to save the local post office.

"There should be something like a bit tax," he said during the March 5 meeting. "I mean, a bit tax could be a cent per gigabit and they would make, probably, billions of dollars a year."

Plus, he said, there should be a "very tiny tax on email."

This idea goes beyond already-controversial proposals to tax e-commerce -- like buying used books on Amazon. This would be a tax on data.

Wozniak said the response to the idea has been varied.

"Most people don't like the idea of taxing the Internet," he acknowledged. "There are a number of people who say it's a good idea, but some are saying it's impractical and there's no way to do it."

Amid concerns that the government could one day turn to the Internet for a new-age funding stream, Congress in 1998 passed a law called the Internet Tax Freedom Act, which bans Internet taxation.

That law is set to expire next November.

more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yea, make the citizens pay because the Government is slow to adapt, or cannot adapt, to the changing/new technology out there.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I will stop sending e-mails.

Eat that, California.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There was an excellent article on torrentfreak I can't find, basically, before freezers/fridges, you had to import ice 'fresh', then when the freezer came along, it put all those people out of a job, and no-one cared.

The same applies to large music-based distributers and this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

California and a democrat talking about more taxes. Never :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We already pay for the internet, we pay our ISP who give us access to it, so bugger off!

No doubt someone in the US will campaign against this on the argument that it infringes their "free speech"....get it? "Free Speech".....ah never mind!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

internet taxes get dumb fast... last time they pushed for a tax on email one of the versions of the bill said to "tax packets traveling over the internet"... tax packets? seriously? they wanted about 1 cent per packet... I think they thought a packet was what an email envelope was or something...... because 99% of the USA would be broke just going online.... heck and if you taxed traffic, are you going to tax ARP packets and all the other background noise that comes to your modem / gateway? because its of course internet traffic... and if someone DDoS'es you, now you have to pay for what they did to you?..... love it......

heck places like TWC and Comcast include "background traffic" that you can't stop in your monthly usage..... I once left a DOCSIS3 modem idle on a Comcast line for a month jus to see how much background traffic it got...... 3.2GB of DHCP and ARP traffic along with ping floods, attempted dos attacks... etc.... and this was a modem that had nothing plugged into its WAN port, that is what Comcast reported on their website as it's monthly usage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Correction to the title.

Tax & Send: Will E-mails Cost YouAmericans?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

.....spam just got more expensive :laugh:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How would they be able to tax us accurately?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How would they be able to tax us accurately?

oh read what I wrote above... one of the old bills had that figured out by taxing "packets"... since ISP's can log packet statistics for your account.... makes sense right?.... *rolls eyes* dumb politicians

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Haha... good luck with that :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

oh read what I wrote above... one of the old bills had that figured out by taxing "packets"... since ISP's can log packet statistics for your account.... makes sense right?.... *rolls eyes* dumb politicians

Oh thanks! (Y) And yes--Politics in general are stupid, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Like I said many times, it's only a matter of time before some smart government employee realizes we are all breathing and that they could tax us for the air we breath.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

California is the puss filled boil on the backside of society

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Like I said many times, it's only a matter of time before some smart government employee realizes we are all breathing and that they could tax us for the air we breath.

yeah, via a "carbon tax" because we produce carbon dioxide........ :rolleyes: you know someone will try it someday.....

heck we already have the IMF saying Gasoline should have a mandatory $1.50 tax on all "Developed" countries to stop people from using cars...... great..... put public transportation in the middle of the USA... see how cost effective that is... idiots

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

...and this guy thinks it is a good idea...you know...to reduce spam.

But email I'm as familiar with as a nagging toothache. I spend way too much of my day, as do many workers who dependon computers, hitting the delete key or

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

...and this guy thinks it is a good idea...you know...to reduce spam.

http://articles.lati...il-tax-20130325

Postage cost sure hasn't helped reducing unwanted snail mail. Gmail (and Hotmail), in my opinion and experience does a very good job in keeping spam out of my Outlook. I'll log into gmail every so often to look at the spam folder just to be sure it hasn't filtered something I want...but 99% of the time it "just works".

I can see them taxing goods purchased off the internet...though I wouldn't like it...it is something I would understand and think it within reason. Sending emails through a service that I'm paying for and is already taxed....nope.

and since most spam comes from overseas.... won't do crap.... but i'm not gona pay to use email I'd just use another service like facebook, oh want to tax facebook too?.... im sure facebook would have something to say about that.... run your own internal mail server then, how are you going to tax that if you only mail internally?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We should tax stupid ideas. Then the government would be bankrupt. Oh wait..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Soooooo...... are you going to tax spam too ? :|

oSaB1cZ.png

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This e-mail tax proposal is being made by ONE California official ... A councilman, Gordon Wozniak, representing District 8 of Berkeley, California. I hardly think this ignoramus is representative of the entire state of California and the U.S. Please, let us stop providing attention to these morons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

^no, you must pay attention and rebuke him everytime, otherwise what he said will passed into Bill, and it will bill you up eventualy.

Govt will tax the ISP, then ISP will increases the fee rates in the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

^no, you must pay attention and rebuke him everytime, otherwise what he said will passed into Bill, and it will bill you up eventualy.

Govt will tax the ISP, then ISP will increases the fee rates in the end.

... damn it, you're right. :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Taxed emails, it seems we kinda run out of ideas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This e-mail tax proposal is being made by ONE California official ... A councilman, Gordon Wozniak, representing District 8 of Berkeley, California. I hardly think this ignoramus is representative of the entire state of California and the U.S. Please, let us stop providing attention to these morons.

Apparently you don't know our government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.