Jump to content



Photo
nsa

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 +techbeck

techbeck

    It's not that I am lazy, it's that I just don't care

  • 19,642 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 27 March 2013 - 21:56

Among the many interesting facts about the super-secret National Security Agency is the fact that, for decades, it has published its own in-house technical journal, written by and for agency employees.
Titled Cryptolog: The Journal of Technical Health, its existence has been known for years, having been mentioned in books about the agency by authors like James Bamford. But its contents, like so much else about the agency and its work, have remained a secret.

That changed today, when the NSA declassified about a quarter century of back issues of the publication running from 1974 to 1997. You can have a look at the results here.
In its first issue, the magazine explains its mission in a “Letter of Introduction” by Maj. Gen. Herbert E. Wolff, who in 1974 — a time when the NSA’s very existence was still a secret — was deputy director of operations, like so:

This is CRYPTOLOG — a new vehicle for the interchange of ideas on technical subjects in Operations.
Operations is a large organization: the skills and talents on which we depend are many, our workings widely scattered and often sequestered in compartments. These conditions argue for special efforts to keep us in touch with each other and with new problems as they arise and new solutions as they are developed

In the summer of 1997, the most recent issue declassified, there’s a lengthy Q&A interview with an unnamed employee, known by the nickname “Ski,” who was retiring after 50 years of combined service with the NSA and as a military cryptologist. Asked about what it was like to work for the NSA in its early days in the 1950s, the bulk of his answer is: Censored.

And so it is with a lot of the contents of the “declassified” Cryptolog. For all the vaunted talk about declassification and transparency, there are still apparently a lot of secrets to protect.

At other times, Cryptolog reads like an amateur computer club newsletter. Consider this section of a review of the 1996 software textbook “Rapid Development” by Microsoft’s Steve McConnell from an NSA employee whose name has been (thankfully) censored: “I highly recommend this book as the next much-highlighted, marked-in-the-margins, dogeared, no-you-cannot-borrow-it-get-one-of-your-own books for every software developer, team leader and technical manager.”

Here’s the secret it has been hiding all these years: With its multibillion dollar budget, the NSA apparently couldn’t afford to hire an editor.

http://allthingsd.co...e/?mod=atdtweet


#2 PGHammer

PGHammer

    Neowinian Senior

  • 9,283 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 03
  • Location: Accokeek, MD
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center x64

Posted 27 March 2013 - 22:07

http://allthingsd.co...e/?mod=atdtweet


And that a nation - ANY nation - has things they wish to keep mum about is news?

Why is it that only the United States is criticized for wanting to keep secrets?

Do you think that the NSA is the only organization of its kind in existence? Puh-lease; the direct ancestor of the NSA/AFSA is not even American.

Quite a few countries have organizations and agencies dedicated to protecting things the nation deems secret and pilfering the secrets of others - and yes, I'm even including theocracies (not just Iran - the olderst known intelligence service is run by the State of the Vatican). To think otherwise is to be sailing on the Royal Barge on the Egyptian River.

#3 FlintyV

FlintyV

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,377 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 27 March 2013 - 23:45

And that a nation - ANY nation - has things they wish to keep mum about is news?

Why is it that only the United States is criticized for wanting to keep secrets?

Do you think that the NSA is the only organization of its kind in existence? Puh-lease; the direct ancestor of the NSA/AFSA is not even American.

Quite a few countries have organizations and agencies dedicated to protecting things the nation deems secret and pilfering the secrets of others - and yes, I'm even including theocracies (not just Iran - the olderst known intelligence service is run by the State of the Vatican). To think otherwise is to be sailing on the Royal Barge on the Egyptian River.


Where in the thread/article are the US being criticized for keeping secrets?

#4 Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 63,500 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 27 March 2013 - 23:47

I get it monthly in hardcover. :shiftyninja:

#5 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 28 March 2013 - 01:26

Keeping secrets is a necessary part of any government. These small tidbits offers an amazing look into our government's underworld.