Jump to content

44 posts in this topic

Posted

[quote name='majortom1981' timestamp='1365179740' post='595619138']
You do know their taxes are paying for the school right? They are paying for the meals through their taxes.
[/quote]

You do know a lot of people don't even pay their taxes.


My mom was a teacher for 20+ years. One thing she learned. Don't give kids money. Don't give kids credit. Nothing like seeing someones hard earn money go towards someone elses kid.

And I loved seeing some of the debt some of the kids had from credited lunches. I've seen kids having a $ 780 lunch bill at the end of the school year and the parents won't even pay it.

Sounds completely reasonable to me /s
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='techbeck' timestamp='1365180589' post='595619202']
I dont think it matters if it was before or after. They would be short 5 cents regardless.
[/quote]

No. Before the next meal would mean 5c + cost of the meal. After it would be just 5c.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='rr_dRock' timestamp='1365180676' post='595619208']
No. Before the next meal would mean 5c + cost of the meal. After it would be just 5c.
[/quote]

Regardless...its stupid to deny anyone food over 5 cents. Not, if this was a regular occurrence then maybe...but again, a notice should of been sent to the parents first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='Blank' timestamp='1365180579' post='595619200']
They can get free lunches by going through Social Services and such, like how they go get food stamps, but their parents actually have to go and sign up and meet the requirements.

The government just doesn't give schools bag fulls of money to feed random kids.
[/quote]

Yes it does actually. read the article. if you want federal funds you have to abide by its rules. one of those rules is feeding kids that cannot afford to pay for lunch. The outside contractor broke the law by denying the kids their lunch. They were supposed to get a cheese sandwich. not nothing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Maybe you need to read the damn article then. When I went to high school, those that got free food from school were the one that qualified for free meal. Can you explain for me why these kids required pre-paid card if the school suppose to feed them free. Are you one of those irresponsible parents?

[quote name='majortom1981' timestamp='1365180573' post='595619198']
The school gets funds from the government specifically for feeding those kids that do not pay. read the darn article.
[/quote]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='techbeck' timestamp='1365180770' post='595619214']
Regardless...its stupid to deny anyone food over 5 cents. Not, if this was a regular occurrence then maybe...but again, a notice should of been sent to the parents first.
[/quote]

It's not just five cents though... if they were already 5c under, then got another meal, it could be ~5 dollars maybe more... imagine 50 kids don't have that five dollars, that's $[b]250[/b]. Now, if you think that's an insignificant amount, please, feel free to share.



(edited to 250 as the fact I am an imbecile was pointed out.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='MDboyz' timestamp='1365180885' post='595619220']
Maybe you need to read the damn article then. When I went to high school, those that got free food from school were the one that qualified for free meal. Can you explain for me why these kids required pre-paid card if the school suppose to feed them free. Are you one of those irresponsible parents?
[/quote]

This was added into the federal law in 2011 as in a linked article

[url="http://www.turnto10.com/story/21866863/students-say-they-were-told-if-you-cant-pay-you-cant-eat"]http://www.turnto10....ay-you-cant-eat[/url]

"Federal subsidies also require that schools at least feed students a grilled cheese sandwich if they aren't on free or reduced lunches but still cannot pay. This option was seen as controversial when introduced back in 2011."

it states that even if they have to pay if they do not have the money they are to receive a cheese sandwich. The article stated they were not given this cheese sandwich which goes against the federal law. Both the principle and the head of the private contractor said the employees were wrong for doing this since its against the law to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='Blank' timestamp='1365181120' post='595619232']
When you go and apply for free lunches you get the same meal everyone else is getting.
Cheese sandwhich and apple juice is something else.
[/quote]

Yes I know but the article states the kids were denied anything. the law states they were supposed to receive a cheese sandwhich. The cheese sandwich is a minimum type lunch. keep in mind the article states this is new as of 2011. The law states every kid gets food.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Poor kids. They shouldn't have to bear the brunt of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='rr_dRock' timestamp='1365179925' post='595619144']
I'm fully supportive for two tier health care. Screw the poor, it's not my fault they made bad decisions.
[/quote]

Uhh sarcasm? As much as I'd like to agree with you, not everyone is poor because they've made poor decisions (Why there are many who did).

But yeah, rules are rules. No money, no lunch. This is not a charity. What's next, me complaining a restaurant won't give me food because I don't have enough? :s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='Blank' timestamp='1365181315' post='595619238']
Since you care so much you should start a cheese sandwich factory, and feed all the hungry children of the world.
[/quote]

I hope you never collect unemployment or never get old. The fact is the school is collecting federal funds. if they do not want to abide by the laws concerning those funds then they should stop collecting the funds in the first place.

ojh by the way even the company released an apology

"[url="https://www.facebook.com/pages/Whitsons-Culinary-Group/111645075565493"]Whitsons Culinary Group[/url]


To the Attleboro Community:

Whitsons School Nutrition has issued a statement apologizing to the students and the school community and we are in the process of conducting a full investigation. Please be assured that the individuals responsible for this were acting on their own and not under the direction of Whitsons School Nutrition. Whitsons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='rr_dRock' timestamp='1365180995' post='595619224']
It's not just five cents though... if they were already 5c under, then got another meal, it could be ~5 dollars maybe more... imagine 50 kids don't have that five dollars, that's $500. Now, if you think that's an insignificant amount, please, feel free to share.
[/quote]

50 kids...

5 dollars...

500 hundred dollars? :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='threetonesun' timestamp='1365181640' post='595619248']
50 kids...

5 dollars...

500 hundred dollars? :laugh:
[/quote]

Yeah, my maths suck today. sorry man. $250. I will concede that I am a moron.

(or I could just say I meant to put 100 kids.... lol.)

[quote name='majortom1981' timestamp='1365181599' post='595619244']
they didn't follow the rules though. the rules state the kids where to get a cheese sandwich if they didn't pay.
[/quote]
Unfortunately this.


As against social services and using taxpayer funds to help the poor continue to be poor as I am. You cannot have a service provider break the law, and know that that was the only law they're breaking... I would assume if they are lenient about breaking this one, other things must get "overlooked" as well, such as sanitation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='rr_dRock' timestamp='1365180995' post='595619224']
It's not just five cents though... if they were already 5c under, then got another meal, it could be ~5 dollars maybe more... imagine 50 kids don't have that five dollars, that's $[b]250[/b]. Now, if you think that's an insignificant amount, please, feel free to share.
[/quote]

[quote][b]Five cents of debt[/b] was enough for cafeteria employees at the Coehlo Middle School to instruct kids at least one day this week to [b]dump out the food[/b][/quote]

It was over 5 cents. And they had to dump out the food? What a waste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Schools should not even be in the Lunch business.

This has become a mismanaged racket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='techbeck' timestamp='1365183203' post='595619324']
It was over 5 cents. And they had to dump out the food? What a waste.
[/quote]

Again. Do you not notice they didn't say if it was previously existing debt? IT'S NOT 5c if they ALREADY owed five cents BEFORE they picked up their meal. The cost of the meal is lost either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='rr_dRock' timestamp='1365183369' post='595619330']
Again. Do you not notice they didn't say if it was previously existing debt? IT'S NOT 5c if they ALREADY owed five cents BEFORE they picked up their meal. The cost of the meal is lost either way.
[/quote]

Debt means its already owed. So there are 2 scenario here..

Before
So a kid owes 5 cents for a previous meal and goes to pay for another. They are denied food and told to toss it out because of the previous debt. So this is over 5 cents.

After
A meal costs 3.05 and the kid only has 3 bucks on him. The kid is told to toss out the food. The kid should get his $3 back since he received no food and it then is still over 5 cents. But this isnt debt since the kid didnt owe anything because he received no goods/services.

Maybe I am just not understanding you correctly....i dunno.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='techbeck' timestamp='1365184537' post='595619348']
Debt means its already owed. So there are 2 scenario here..

[b]Before
So a kid owes 5 cents for a previous meal and goes to pay for another. They are denied food and told to toss it out because of the previous debt. So this is over 5 cents.[/b]

After
A meal costs 3.05 and the kid only has 3 bucks on him. The kid is told to toss out the food. The kid should get his $3 back since he received no food and it then is still over 5 cents. But this isnt debt since the kid didnt owe anything because he received no goods/services.

Maybe I am just not understanding you correctly....i dunno.
[/quote]

No you're not. He takes one and goes to pay for it which is 3 bucks.... He doesn't have the five cents extra nor the three dollars, so now its 3.05 he owes, as he has a meal, and still needs to pay for the previous 5c debt. so he's told to throw it away (at which point he no longer owes the 3 dollars, as he doesn't have any food, although a (ridiculous) argument could be made to have him pay that as well). The meal costs 3 bucks, which is ADDED to the existing debt, not just thrown out the window. So they're being denied because they can't pay 3.05 (debt + new mea). not .05.

(as ****ed up as that paragraph is now that I read it. It's essentially he's trying to add more debt, but the bank wont loan him any more money because he's five cents overdrawn, so they take his new loan back as well ( and chuck the cash in the burning barrel). is that more clear?)

In your second scenario, the customer service rep, whatever they're called, should eat his own hat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='rr_dRock' timestamp='1365186869' post='595619426']
No you're not. He takes one and goes to pay for it which is 3 bucks.... He doesn't have the five cents extra nor the three dollars, so now its 3.05 he owes, as he has a meal, and still needs to pay for the previous 5c debt. so he's told to throw it away (at which point he no longer owes the 3 dollars, as he doesn't have any food, although a (ridiculous) argument could be made to have him pay that as well). The meal costs 3 bucks, which is ADDED to the existing debt, not just thrown out the window. So they're being denied because they can't pay 3.05 (debt + new mea). not .05.
[/quote]

In your explanation, he doesnt have the 3 dollars to pay for another meal when he previously owed 5 cents. In mine, he does. Bottom line is we are both right depending on what the real story is...and unfortunately, we were really not given any more info to go by.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.