Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|California man, 80 shot burglar despite pleas of pregnancy||
|OS X 10.10 DP4, iTunes 12.0 beta out||
|Waaay Late, Mac Specs Suck Now||
|Poll: What do you think the Windows Threshold retail name will be?||
|Neowin Members Digital Gallery 2014||
Posted 07 April 2013 - 21:21
Posted 08 April 2013 - 01:22
Physicists have nudged electrons to change their spin in just quadrillionths of a second, the fastest ever achieved and a basic-science feat that could lead to faster computer processing and storage.
Posted 08 April 2013 - 07:08
Posted 08 April 2013 - 17:25
Posted 08 April 2013 - 17:57
Posted 08 April 2013 - 18:05
A terahertz clock will require a pretty tremendous amount of power, so it will probably be a while before we see something of that speed.
Posted 08 April 2013 - 18:20
Maybe, they did note: "with even less power used," I'm perfectly okay with my 2.66Ghz lol.
Posted 08 April 2013 - 18:52
Does that mean those people that specify 3 GHz quad-core processor power as 12 GHz will soon be in trouble because teraherz will outpwn them?
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:55
It is quite a nonsense, indeed.
I dunno what you said, but passwords will be cracked.