Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Apple pushing music labels to kill free Spotify streaming ahead of Beats relaunch||
|Another bad ad||
|Windows 10 10074 not detecting dual monitor setup (NVidia)||
|Save 65% off this Nexus 5 and 1 year Unlimited Talk-and-Text from FreedomPop bundle||
|Three minor updates to Windows 10 in build 10074||
Posted 07 April 2013 - 21:21
Posted 08 April 2013 - 01:22
Physicists have nudged electrons to change their spin in just quadrillionths of a second, the fastest ever achieved and a basic-science feat that could lead to faster computer processing and storage.
Posted 08 April 2013 - 07:08
Posted 08 April 2013 - 17:25
Posted 08 April 2013 - 17:57
Posted 08 April 2013 - 18:05
A terahertz clock will require a pretty tremendous amount of power, so it will probably be a while before we see something of that speed.
Posted 08 April 2013 - 18:20
Maybe, they did note: "with even less power used," I'm perfectly okay with my 2.66Ghz lol.
Posted 08 April 2013 - 18:52
Does that mean those people that specify 3 GHz quad-core processor power as 12 GHz will soon be in trouble because teraherz will outpwn them?
Posted 08 April 2013 - 19:55
It is quite a nonsense, indeed.
I dunno what you said, but passwords will be cracked.