Jump to content



Photo

Ice Age words stand the test of time


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 compl3x

compl3x

    One day until retirement

  • 7,257 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 09 May 2013 - 07:00

"Ye old mother, hand I this black worm". It's a sentence that might startle your work colleagues, but if someone from 15,000 years ago was around the chances are they would understand you.


The sentence is made from some of the 23 words researchers believe have remained unchanged through the millennia and are part of a "super language" Ice Age people used to communicate.

The claim is published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal.


In the study Professor of Evolutionary Biology Mark Pagel and his team use statistical methods to show that certain words have changed so slowly over long periods of time as to retain traces of their ancestry for up to 10,000 or more years.

These words, they say, point to the existence of a linguistic super-family tree from which the seven major language families of Eurasia (Indo-European, Uralic, Altaic, Kartvelian, Dravidian, Chuckchee-Kamchatkan and Eskimo-Aleut) have evolved.



'Ultra-conserved'



The 23 "ultra-conserved words" uncovered by the study are: thou, I, not, that, we, to give, who, this, what, man/male, ye, old, mother, to hear, hand, fire, to pull, black, to flow, bark, ashes, to spit, worm.

Pagel, from the University of Reading in Britain, says certain very commonly used words, like pronouns, are more likely to stay the same over the millennia.


"We discovered numerals, pronouns and special adverbs are replaced far more slowly, with linguistic half-lives of once every 10,000 or even more years," Pagel says.


In other words, everyday words like "I, you, we, man and bark" have, in certain languages, the same meaning and nearly the same sound as they did thousands of years ago.


"As a rule of thumb, words used more than about once per 1000 in everyday speech were seven to 10 times more likely to show deep ancestry in the Eurasian super-family," Pagel says.

This equates roughly to their being used 16 times a day per speaker, the researchers say.


Focusing on these common lexical items helped the researchers avoid a common pitfall of historical linguistics - that it is difficult to distinguish between words that sound alike because of common ancestry and words that sound alike because of simple coincidence.


For instance, "team" and "cream" in English are unrelated, but sound quite similar.


But the everyday words were statistically likely to be related, and so when the researchers found ones that sounded alike, they were able to conclude with fair confidence that it was not simply by chance.


Pagel's previous research has looked into the evolution of more than 7000 Indo-European languages, looking for shared patterns in how language is used and why some words stay in use while others disappear over time.


"Our results suggest a remarkable fidelity in the transmission of some words and give theoretical justification to the search for features of language that might be preserved across wide spans of time and geography," Pagel and his team write.



http://www.abc.net.a.../08/3754494.htm


#2 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 09 May 2013 - 13:42

I thought we didn't have any records from 10,000 years ago.

#3 spacer

spacer

    I'm awesome

  • 6,139 posts
  • Joined: 09-November 06
  • Location: Connecticut, USA
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Nexus 4

Posted 09 May 2013 - 13:48

There is no possible way they could know how early humans communicated, what it sounded like, or even if they used words as we know them. This research seems like guessing to me.

#4 Lant

Lant

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,595 posts
  • Joined: 13-April 06

Posted 10 May 2013 - 08:33

I'd recommend reading the paper, abc misreported it. The conclusions weren't that you could say those words and they would understand you, but it was statistically likely that people back then would have had words that meant the same (or a similar) thing.

#5 HighwayGlider

HighwayGlider

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,803 posts
  • Joined: 05-November 05

Posted 10 May 2013 - 08:48

The language itself didn't change much, but most people use slang terms now.

Yo rudeboy, lemme tell ya somethin, y' see, fish could keep dem mouth closed, dem wouldn't get caught, rudeboy.



Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!