Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
techbeck

U.S. Now Paints Apple as

9 posts in this topic

WASHINGTON ? The e-mail, from Steve Jobs of Apple to James Murdoch of News Corporation, reads as if one old sport were trying to cajole another into joining a caper: ?Throw in with Apple and see if we can all make a go of this to create a real mainstream e-books market at $12.99 and $14.99.?

According to the Justice Department, that e-mail is part of the evidence that Apple was the ?ringmaster? in a price-fixing conspiracy in the market for e-books, a more direct leadership role than originally portrayed in the department?s April 2012 antitrust lawsuit against Apple and five publishing companies.

In its suit, the government said that Apple and the publishers conspired to fix e-book prices as part of a scheme to force Amazon to raise its e-book price from a uniform $9.99 to the higher level noted by Mr. Jobs in the e-mail, which publishers wanted. That, the department said, resulted in higher prices to consumers and ill-gotten profits for Apple and its partners.

The e-mail was released on Tuesday as part of the government?s filing before the trial in the case, set to begin on June 3 in New York.

Two days after Mr. Jobs?s e-mail to Mr. Murdoch, HarperCollins, the publishing company owned by News Corporation, signed an agreement with Apple to force all sellers of electronic books to adopt the new pricing model, the government said.

Apple is the only defendant left in the lawsuit after five publishing companies ? Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster ? agreed last year and earlier this year to settle the charges.

Tom Neumayr, a spokesman for Apple, said the company did not conspire to fix prices on e-books.

?We helped transform the e-book market with the introduction of the iBookstore in 2010, bringing consumers an expanded selection of e-books and delivering innovative new features,? Mr. Neumayr said. ?The market has been thriving and innovating since Apple?s entry, and we look forward to going to trial to defend ourselves and move forward.?

The Justice Department?s latest filings in the case also paint a picture of an Apple willing to use its power in mobile apps to strong-arm reluctant partners. That is especially evident in the accusations the department makes about Apple?s dealings with Random House, the last major publisher to resist striking an e-books deal with Apple.

In July 2010, Mr. Jobs, Apple?s former chief executive, told the chief executive of Random House, Markus Dohle, that the publisher would suffer a loss of support from Apple if it held out much longer, according to an account of the conversation provided by Mr. Dohle in the filing. Two months later, Apple threatened to block an e-book application by Random House from appearing in Apple?s App Store because it had not agreed to a deal with Apple, the filing said.

After Random House finally agreed to a contract on Jan. 18, 2011, Eddy Cue, the Apple executive in charge of its e-books deals, sent an e-mail to Mr. Jobs attributing the publisher?s capitulation, in part, to ?the fact that I prevented an app from Random House from going live in the app store,? the filing reads.

The newly released documents also quote David Shanks, chief executive of Penguin, as saying that Apple was the ?facilitator and go-between? for the publishing companies in arranging the agreement.

And the documents quote Mr. Dohle as saying that an Apple executive counseled him that the publishing company could threaten to withhold e-books from Amazon to force Amazon to accept the higher prices. Random House was not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

The price-fixing suit charges that Apple advised publishers to move from a wholesale pricing model, which let retailers charge what they wanted, to a system that allowed publishers to set their own e-book prices, a model known as agency pricing.

The publishers said Amazon was pricing e-books below their actual cost, putting financial pressure on the publishers that they said would drive them out of business. The dispute underscored the extent to which competition from digital retailers like Amazon was transforming the traditional book industry.

Three of the publishers, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster and Hachette, settled with the government immediately. Penguin, Macmillan and Apple originally decided to fight the charges. But in December, to clear the way for its merger with Random House, Penguin settled, followed by Macmillan in February.

The settlements call for the publishers to lift restrictions imposed on discounting and other promotions by e-book retailers. The companies are also prohibited from entering into new agreements with similar restrictions until December 2014.

The publishers must also notify the government in advance about any e-book ventures they plan with each other, and they are prohibited for five years from agreeing to any kind of so-called most-favored-nation clause with any retailer, which establishes that no other retailer is allowed to sell e-books for a lower price.

http://www.nytimes.c...-nytmedia&_r=1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops. Someone has been finally caught.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apple, the new Microsoft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There can be arguments about Amazon and their business practices, which may be unethical, but legal, however Apple and the publishers were caught illegally trying to price fix the ebook market via collusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, dont think Apple can weasel its way out of this one. But stranger things have happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is as plain as day.. this is the reason why I think they are one of the most rotten companies currently. They are on par with Microsoft at their worst.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apple's lawyers to the judge, on reading the charges: "Your honor, you are reading it wrong."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apple's lawyers to the judge, on reading the charges: "Your honor, you are reading it wrong."

More like, Apple's lawyers to the judge, in chambers "Your honor, how much to make this go away?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is as plain as day.. this is the reason why I think they are one of the most rotten companies currently. They are on par with Microsoft at their worst.

Yeah, much like MS, their sins are catching up with them. MS learned their lesson the hard way. I hope Apple does too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.