Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Damo R.

movies 'Nymphomaniac' to feature 'groundbreaking sex'

25 posts in this topic

87.png

Lars von Trier's Nymphomaniac project will reportedly feature "groundbreaking" sex scenes.

The upcoming two-part erotic film is to feature graphic sex scenes between cast members, producer Louise Vesth told The Hollywood Reporter.

However, the real hardcore scenes will be filmed using body doubles, who will then be combined with the stars' non-explicit acts using digital technology, she explained.

Charlotte Gainsbourg, Stellan Skarsgard, Shia LeBeouf, Uma Thurman, Willem Dafoe, Christian Slater and Jamie Bell are among the film's cast.

"We shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital-impose the two," Vesth said.

"So above the waist it will be the star and below the waist it will be the doubles."

The post-production work on the project is said to be the reason why it was not available to be screened at Cannes this week.

Vesth continued to explain that von Trier has used experimental techniques in the film, including double exposures and utilising words and symbols over sequences.

One distributor who saw early footage of the film described it as "groundbreaking...like nothing [they've] ever seen".

Vesth added that she hopes von Trier will end his self-imposed ban on promotion, following his infamous Nazi remarks two years ago.

"Lars has thrown everything in this one," she said. "It's about religion, about God, about philosophy. There's so much to talk about with this movie. I hope he changes his mind and starts giving interviews again."

The world premiere will be held in Copenhagen, Denmark this December.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/news/a483431/lars-von-triers-nymphomaniac-to-feature-groundbreaking-sex-scenes.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd definitely blow my wad doing pretend sex with those 2 girls that are standing side by side in the picture. lol!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So a Porn film by any other name

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So a Porn film by any other name

Basically yeah.

I clicked this topic, expecting something incredibly juicy - but no such luck.

And in my opinion Lars von Trier is extremely overrated (as is Wes Anderson)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital-impose the two,"

This is stupid and they should feel stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"We shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital-impose the two," Vesth said.

Can't get much more live action than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd definitely blow my wad doing pretend sex with those 2 girls that are standing side by side in the picture. lol!!

One of which who looks like she's 14.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't get much more live action than that.

Sounds like something Roger Rabbit should be in...........then with the other hand, maybe it is :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stunt ****! (Live action, yeehaw)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder who the body doubles were.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital-impose the two,"

This is stupid and they should feel stupid.

But its not porn if they do it like that, it's erotic film play.

Not sure how it's ground breaking, unlike they have some extra large BBW with CGI effects where they have sex falling off a roof or something...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OH NO NOT BBWs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like Jessica Alba in the film Machete, where her breasts were actually a double's. Is this meant to be groundbreaking in the amount of sex it shows or just the use of technology?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boring.

None of those people are attractive enough to want to watch having sex :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, I really don't want to see Shia's faux-vinegar stroke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boring.

None of those people are attractive enough to want to watch having sex :(

:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boring.

None of those people are attractive enough to want to watch having sex :(

I know right, and the one girl looks like she has the head of a person with Downs Syndrome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so basically mainstream porn :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, look, I have nothing against porn, I watch a fair bit. But sorry, I have no desire to sit in a cinema with loads of other people watching actors pretend to have sex and then body doubles used to insert the real sex. How does it benefit the story - for decades we have known that sex scenes are acted, but now we actually need to see penetration? Why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome thread title but then you went and lost me at Lars von Trier's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He could have halved his cast costs by just hiring porn stars

I have to ask the question though......... Why even make it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He could have halved his cast costs by just hiring porn stars

I have to ask the question though......... Why even make it?

I suppose he wanted to do some different

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose he wanted to do some different

But it's not "different". This is the thing - some of the sexiest stories told can be shown on screen without penetrative sex. It's just pushing it for the sake of pushing it.

I will see it, because I am curious - is this being used in any way to better the delivery of a storyline (I don't see how) or just for the sake of it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But it's not "different". This is the thing - some of the sexiest stories told can be shown on screen without penetrative sex. It's just pushing it for the sake of pushing it. I will see it, because I am curious - is this being used in any way to better the delivery of a storyline (I don't see how) or just for the sake of it?

It was a bit like that film 9 Songs, they showed oral which was massive taboo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.