Jump to content



Photo

7 Ways to Avoid the NSA's Eavesdropping

nsa prism

  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#31 KingCracker

KingCracker

    I am your huckleberry.

  • 4,287 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 12
  • Location: Knoxville,TN

Posted 15 June 2013 - 14:07

Are you really narcissistic enough to think the government feels you're special enough to track and waste resources on?

Oh no! espionage agencies are active in spying!

It's good that they're doing what they're doing. And you have nothing to worry about unless you're planning on/and or active in terrorism/crimes, and in that case, again, i hope they are tracking you.


So hilarious how so many people on the right were okay when the Bush Administration was doing this, but not the black guy!

Its not a good thing that they are spying on ITS OWN CITIZENS. Are you dumb? Its not about me its about ALL American citizens, They should not be collecting data on anyone except for people they believe to be terrorists. Releasing ALL cell phone records to the NSA is wrong period.

And to top off you're ridiculous comment you use the race card :rolleyes:.


#32 Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 61,841 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 15 June 2013 - 15:05

Humans are social beings by design. There has been, is and always will be someone who's not minding his own business and minds someone else's business instead, with varying amounts of success ...


I don't mind be a little bit social, but there are many things I am not going to share, and I am particular with whom I am social.

#33 Raze

Raze

    Mentally Compromised

  • 4,060 posts
  • Joined: 30-December 04
  • Location: Third Planet

Posted 15 June 2013 - 15:22

Its not a good thing that they are spying on ITS OWN CITIZENS. Are you dumb? Its not about me its about ALL American citizens, They should not be collecting data on anyone except for people they believe to be terrorists. Releasing ALL cell phone records to the NSA is wrong period.

And to top off you're ridiculous comment you use the race card :rolleyes:.


But how would they know if you're a terrorist if they don't collect data? /s

Did you worry and complain when it was being done under the Bush administration?


In the 5 plus decades I have lived in the USA I have never had my rights impeded in any way shape or form. Does this mean I'm not concerned about what the NSA and other government agencies are doing, heck yes I am, my main concern is how are they protecting that info from being mishandled or misused. The same concern I have about information I share with businesses, organizations, groups, etc., whether voluntarily or not.

#34 arachnoid

arachnoid

    Times a Ticking

  • 3,151 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 11

Posted 15 June 2013 - 15:39

Didn't I read earlier in the year that the US security services found ner do wells using unmonitored in game team talk as a communication medium and then theres Steganography

#35 Anibal P

Anibal P

    Neowinian

  • 4,140 posts
  • Joined: 11-June 02
  • Location: Waterbury CT
  • OS: Win 8.1
  • Phone: Android

Posted 15 June 2013 - 16:04

The only reason anyone is defending this unconstitutional act is because Obama

Yet many of us were ringing warning bells the moment the Patriot Act was announced, anyone with half a brain knew it would be abused, and we have the proof now, the legalities of the leak aside, this in NOT about politics, this is about defending the rights of ALL Americans no matter who the President is, it's still immoral and unconstitutional

#36 Circaflex

Circaflex

    Neowinian Senior

  • 4,608 posts
  • Joined: 18-August 02
  • Location: California
  • OS: 8 x64, 7 x64, Mountain Lion, Ubuntu
  • Phone: hammerhead

Posted 15 June 2013 - 18:14

8. Don't do illegal stuff.



Oh get over yourself. If you're not breaking the law, you don't matter to them.


you are failing to see the point, once this starts it wont stop. Why should I be treated like a terrorist? Why should my privacy be at risk? Why are you in this thread anyways? get over yourself.

I don't quite understand some of the reactions here.

If you're not doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to hide (in most cases). However, it is perplexing that some don't seem to be bothered by any possible eavesdropping. What more could be a violation of your rights? Your privacy?

EXACTLY!

#37 Crisp

Crisp

    To infinity and beyond

  • 5,393 posts
  • Joined: 06-May 10
  • Location: 127.0.0.1

Posted 15 June 2013 - 18:18

VPN?

#38 suprNOVA

suprNOVA

    devSquad

  • 799 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 10
  • Location: Vancouver, Canada
  • OS: Windows 7/8
  • Phone: Galaxy Note III

Posted 15 June 2013 - 21:07

doubt it, would bet all my worth on it too.


I'm not too sure about that, I just had all my files off Skydrive deleted. Wether you believe me or not is up to you, but that's the reason I posted on this stuff. I had to make sure my account wasn't accessed when I logged in anywhere else but when I found that it had not, I kind of felt weird. All that was left from it was my Billing Order, 1 of my 26 funnypictures, none of my school work, and all of my files like VSO ConvertX to Dvd, Geek Squad MRI, JVPowertools and a couple other programs were gone.

One day as well if you do find out how to bet your "worth on it" message me and we can have this bet :)

#39 arachnoid

arachnoid

    Times a Ticking

  • 3,151 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 11

Posted 15 June 2013 - 21:41

All uploads to skydrive are scanned

Who determines what constitutes vulgarity on a private storage solution? Most reasonable people would also agree that private services should protect against things like child pornography. But imagine if E.L. James decided to use a cloud backup solution for the next book in the Fifty Shades of Grey series. Would those text files, which could be vulgar, profane, or obscene to some, cause James’ SkyDrive account to get shut down?
And how did Microsoft know that there was such content on the user’s SkyDrive account? The only plausible explanation is that Microsoft is analyzing content uploaded to SkyDrive – even content uploaded to private folders – and it’s likely an automated process designed to pull the trigger when it “sees” certain content (such as nudity

http://www.forbes.co...skydrive-users/

You understand that Microsoft may need, and you hereby grant Microsoft the right, to use, modify, adapt, reproduce, distribute, and display content posted on the service solely to the extent necessary to provide the service.
[indent=1]
If you share content on the service in a way that infringes others' copyrights, other intellectual property rights, or privacy rights, you're breaching this contract.
We may refuse to publish your content for any or no reason. We may remove your content from the service at any time if you breach this contract or if we cancel or suspend the service


http://www.theverge....-dropbox-icloud

#40 C-Squarez

C-Squarez

    ARE YOU IN THAT MOOD YET?!?!

  • 5,160 posts
  • Joined: 26-May 05
  • Location: Celebration, Florida

Posted 15 June 2013 - 22:56

The overall tone in this thread is just sad.


+1

I don't quite understand some of the reactions here.

If you're not doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to hide (in most cases). However, it is perplexing that some don't seem to be bothered by any possible eavesdropping. What more could be a violation of your rights? Your privacy?


People are just stupid and clueless man. It's better not to argue with them because they'll never understand.

#41 KingCracker

KingCracker

    I am your huckleberry.

  • 4,287 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 12
  • Location: Knoxville,TN

Posted 15 June 2013 - 23:18

But how would they know if you're a terrorist if they don't collect data? /s

Did you worry and complain when it was being done under the Bush administration?


In the 5 plus decades I have lived in the USA I have never had my rights impeded in any way shape or form. Does this mean I'm not concerned about what the NSA and other government agencies are doing, heck yes I am, my main concern is how are they protecting that info from being mishandled or misused. The same concern I have about information I share with businesses, organizations, groups, etc., whether voluntarily or not.


I never agree'd with the patriot act and if I knew what was going on back then I would of been ****ed then too. They don't need to spy on millions of Americans to capture or stop terrorists. Some good old detective work and monitoring of shady websites and youtube videos helps, and they have done such. But collecting millions of peoples cell phone records is wrong. I don't care what administration is in office.

#42 Raze

Raze

    Mentally Compromised

  • 4,060 posts
  • Joined: 30-December 04
  • Location: Third Planet

Posted 15 June 2013 - 23:21

Whoa King, I'm on your side! (used the /s tag) ;)


#43 Luc2k

Luc2k

    Neowinian

  • 1,057 posts
  • Joined: 16-May 09

Posted 15 June 2013 - 23:54

Let me get this straight, instead of disabling networking hardware in any modern OS, it's recommended to use Win95? The NSA thing stinks, but that suggestion is just retarded.

#44 compl3x

compl3x

    OK. compl3x again.

  • 7,813 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 16 June 2013 - 00:28

Don't want to risk being monitored or having your privacy invaded? Don't use modern technology. It isn't right but it is the reality.

Why do people care if they're being monitored anyway? Given the current narcissistic, "look at me! look at me!" culture where everyone wilfully hands over all types of personal information I would have thought people would be thrilled at the thought of being watched.

#45 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 16 June 2013 - 01:59

Yet many of us were ringing warning bells the moment the Patriot Act was announced, anyone with half a brain knew it would be abused, and we have the proof now, the legalities of the leak aside, this in NOT about politics, this is about defending the rights of ALL Americans no matter who the President is, it's still immoral and unconstitutional


Amen! It was wrong under Bush and it's still wrong under Obama. If something isn't done it'll be wrong under the next President too.



Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!