Jump to content



Photo

  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 compl3x

compl3x

    Feels good, dunnit?

  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:10

When Sony announced that PlayStation 4 would be priced at $399 to an uproar of applause from the audience at its E3 press conference, it secured a critical edge over the Xbox One. But the advantage came at a cost: the PlayStation 4 camera (formerly known as the PlayStation 4 Eye). According to multiple sources, in the months leading up to E3, Sony nixed plans to include the camera add-on with every system and shave $100 off its originally planned price of $499. Most importantly, it did so quietly, informing its retail partners only of the removal of the camera, not specifying the lower price so as not to tip its hand to Microsoft.

 

But in its efforts to undercut the Xbox One, Sony has damned the accessory to a future of fragmented consumer adoption and inconsistent software support. The decision has also rendered a major design element of the DualShock 4 controller — the built-in LED Move tracker — largely useless.

 

 

 

Continue reading




#2 +virtorio

virtorio

    4089 III

  • Tech Issues Solved: 11
  • Joined: 28-April 03
  • Location: New Zealand
  • OS: OSX 10.9, Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy SIII

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:22

Already on the front page:

http://www.neowin.ne...ice-of-xbox-one



#3 trag3dy

trag3dy

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 03-March 05
  • Location: USA

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:24

And not a single person cares. From what I remember hearing if you want a camera for your PS4 it will only cost you $60 to buy it separately instead of an extra $100.



#4 OP compl3x

compl3x

    Feels good, dunnit?

  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:34

Already on the front page:

http://www.neowin.ne...ice-of-xbox-one

 

 

I rarely go to the front page lol.

 

 

And not a single person cares. From what I remember hearing if you want a camera for your PS4 it will only cost you $60 to buy it separately instead of an extra $100.

 

 

Well Sony has a reputation of forcing things on consumers so I think having the option is better for us at the end of the day.



#5 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3 with Galaxy Gear

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:35

Considering that most games likely won't make much use of the camera it's probably a smart idea.



#6 blerk

blerk

    Banned User

  • Joined: 09-December 10

Posted 27 June 2013 - 04:59

How does the move part of the PS4 controller work then? I guess it doesn't work?

 

Bit of a shame really if this is the case. I guess it looks cool.



#7 Matrix XII

Matrix XII

    System F

  • Joined: 12-March 04
  • Location: Vancouver, Canada
  • OS: W7 64 SP1 | OS X 10.9.1
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S3

Posted 27 June 2013 - 06:53

Smart move on Sony's part. The $100 price difference will mean a lot to many people buying this fall.

#8 Nick H.

Nick H.

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 14
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • Location: Switzerland

Posted 27 June 2013 - 07:04

Well I consider it to be a good direction. If I want to flail my arms around to play a game I'll buy the camera separately. As it is I have no interest in Move.

#9 DPyro

DPyro

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 11-December 05
  • Location: Ontario,Canada

Posted 28 June 2013 - 02:52

If I'm not mistaken the PS3 eye/move can still be used with PS4.



#10 OP compl3x

compl3x

    Feels good, dunnit?

  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 28 June 2013 - 03:12

If the roles were reversed; Microsoft making the Kinect optional and Sony forcing the PS4 camera on consumers and designing it so the console won't work without it*, this is something like how the conversation would go:

 

"SONY has to force peripherals onto consumers to make them want them! LOL! MS isn't forcing you to buy and use a Kinect because they know some people mightn't want them! SONY as a company is dead and the PS4 stands no chance!"

 

I'd bet all I own on it.



#11 Yusuf M.

Yusuf M.

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 25-May 04
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Pro
  • Phone: OnePlus One 64GB

Posted 28 June 2013 - 04:16

Cleaned

 

Post flame-bait again and I'll restrict you from the Gamers' Hangout. You know who you are.

 

Anyway...

 

Sony made a smart decision to make the PS4 camera optional. A $100 price difference means a lot to most people. And for most hardcore gamers, a camera isn't a must-have accessory (the same applies to the Kinect). It's seen as an accessory for casual games. I don't want to stand up and hit virtual targets with my hands. I'd rather sit down and enjoy a game with a good story and great visuals. The only reason I'd ever consider buying a camera is for guests. They'd probably enjoy playing a dancing game that tracks their movements.



#12 Andrew

Andrew

    Once More 'Round the Sun

  • Tech Issues Solved: 9
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 01 July 2013 - 21:07

Pretty smart move, both from a price standpoint and also because they aren't locked into supporting Move either.

 

And let's face it, they haven't supported it from day 1. It has some benefits (not FPS before anyone kids themselves), but the chance to 1up MS is much more valuable than some tacky motion feature devs can come up with.

 

If only MS did the same /sigh



#13 BajiRav

BajiRav

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 15-July 04
  • Location: Xbox, where am I?
  • OS: Windows 8.1, Windows 8
  • Phone: Lumia 920

Posted 03 July 2013 - 13:33

If the roles were reversed; Microsoft making the Kinect optional and Sony forcing the PS4 camera on consumers and designing it so the console won't work without it*, this is something like how the conversation would go:

 

 

I'd bet all I own on it.

Well no different than changing from "Including headset with every 360 means you have to suffer annoying 12year olds" to "Sony cares about gamers and includes a headset with every PS4 and Microsoft is just cheap with XB1".



#14 psionicinversion

psionicinversion

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 16-June 05

Posted 03 July 2013 - 13:38

i dont get it... leaving it out cus of $100 difference, but isnt the life cycle supposed to be over like 8 years? kinda miniscule difference if your looking at it in that way



#15 firey

firey

    F͎̗͉͎͈͑͡ȉ͎̣̐́ṙ͖̺͕͙̓̌è̤̞͉̟̲͇̍̍̾̓ͥͅy͓̍̎̌̏̒

  • Tech Issues Solved: 6
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location: Ontario, Canada
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Android (4.1.2)

Posted 03 July 2013 - 13:40

Fine by me.  No reason to pay extra for something you don't need.