Jump to content



Photo

George Zimmerman has been found not guilty!

george zimmerman

  • Please log in to reply
490 replies to this topic

#481 SupportGeek

SupportGeek

    Neowinian

  • 483 posts
  • Joined: 09-July 12

Posted 23 July 2013 - 04:28

That's what she said. He was a block from his home. What do u you mean he has no business being there? I don't think you guys no anything about the case. His father home was a block from where he got gunned down.

 

Looks to me you are the one that knows nothing about this case Im plenty familiar. 

Z was never investigated for "domestic violence", there were no calls of disturbance to be checked out, no charges, no arrests, nothing at all beyond his EX filling in a restraining order and for the REASON she listed "domestic violence" because you cant just get one of those on someone for no reason at all.

In fact they BOTH filled these out the exact same way on each other, doesnt mean it happened, just means they wanted to get the RO passed.

Can you locate an actual charge of domestic violence? or anything that he was investigated for? Go ahead, I'll wait. Otherwise any further mention of domestic violence on Z's part can simply be regarded as the hogwash it is, media spin, no real substance.

He was NOT a block away, he was several hundred yards away from where he was allegedly staying, about 2-3 suburban blocks, and NO, he really had no business being on other peoples property, casing out cars and houses.

 

Go read more on the case and the incident, stop watching NBC and listening to Al Sharpton, none of them are telling you the truth.




#482 Wyn6

Wyn6

    Neowinian

  • 767 posts
  • Joined: 01-March 12
  • Location: Dallas
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Lumia 925

Posted 23 July 2013 - 16:20

Wow. Some of you guys are beating this race thing to death. This thread has veered into another topic (or two) entirely. There's a lot of "black people are the real racists," comments being thrown about. I highly doubt that any of you making comments like that, actually KNOW any black people. I'm not talking about coworkers and some guy you had a class with in high school or college. I'm talking about people you've spent your lives around.

 

And, it appears this has also careened off into politics as well. So, it's back to the old tried and true of Black vs. White and Liberal (Democrat) vs. Conservative (Republicans). Ah well.

 

And, that's all I have to say about that.



#483 trag3dy

trag3dy

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,771 posts
  • Joined: 03-March 05
  • Location: USA

Posted 23 July 2013 - 16:43

He was tresspassing on a neighbours lawn, in an area that had seen a lot of break-ins. Zimmerman had a right to be suspicious. Also Trayvon committed a crime the moment he attacked Zimmerman unprovoked.

 

Feels like a broken record is playing around here with how often that has to be repeated.

 

 

How did Zimmerman get there? Did Trayvon stalk Zimmerman? Or was he defending against some unknown stalker? Zimmerman can defend himself but trayvon cant? Why does trayvon have to run away? Why can't Zimmerman just stay away as the 9/11 operator suggested? (who by the way is a trained experienced professional)

if the coward didnt have a gun. they'd both still be alive today, which is the point.

 

See, this is the problem with your argument. You don't even know what you're talking about. Zimmerman never talked to a 911 operator. The number he called was a non-emergency number and the people there have/had no authority to tell him to do anything. Besides the fact that when they did tell him he didn't need to follow the kid he was going back to his car when he was ambushed.



#484 +cyoung1616

cyoung1616

    12 Year Veteran. 2001-2013

  • 1,870 posts
  • Joined: 06-October 01
  • Location: Texarkana,Arkansas
  • OS: Windows 7 Pro

Posted 23 July 2013 - 17:05

Trayvon would probably still be alive if Mama hadn't booted his ass out.

 

 

Cody



#485 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 23 July 2013 - 18:01

Trayvon would probably still be alive if Mama hadn't booted his ass out.

 

Alas, we may never know.



#486 Houtei

Houtei

    Neowinian

  • 590 posts
  • Joined: 02-November 07

Posted 23 July 2013 - 21:16

http://youtu.be/9CUNUVhzFAQ

 

Saw this about Trayvon just thought I would share.



#487 necroxd

necroxd

    Neowinian

  • 366 posts
  • Joined: 12-February 09
  • Location: Houston

Posted 25 July 2013 - 17:17

Trayvon would probably still be alive if Mama hadn't booted his ass out.

His mom lived faraway in another neighborhood. He had been living with his dad for about 2 weeks.


Cody



#488 gameboy1977

gameboy1977

    Neowinian

  • 975 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 05
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8

Posted 26 July 2013 - 01:53

http://usnews.nbcnew...-acquitted?lite=

 

We will let God will take care of this, because too many people are arguing about this case often. geee!



#489 Boz

Boz

    Neowinian Senior

  • 7,462 posts
  • Joined: 21-October 03

Posted 26 July 2013 - 23:21

The Zimmerman what-if scenario actually happened (actually this was even worse than what happened in Zimmerman case)

 

gdewz6wGwbos-jK5HrwuiTl72eJkfbmt4t8yenIm

 

The case of Roderick Scott.. The Zimmerman what if scenario? Outrage among liberals and media = ZERO

"In April of 2009 Mr. Roderick Scott awoke at 3am to the sounds of three young men breaking into cars on his street. He called the police and went down to the street to make sure the young men did not flee before the police arrived. He shouted at the three to “freeze” and told them that the police were coming soon. The three boys stood before the big man obviously considering what they should do.

That’s when Christopher Cervini (17) rushed at Mr. Scott uttering “I’ll get you” or “I’ll get him.” Roderick Scott fired twice, killing the teenager. The trial that followed was again a case of prosecutorial overreach, as they tried to charge Mr. Scott with manslaughter. Fortunately for Mr. Scott, a jury of his peers agreed with him that he did only what was needed to protect himself.

Afterwards the prosecutor opined, “I just hope it’s not a message to this community… that you have the right to shoot an unarmed 17-year-old kid for breaking into a car.” The problem is that Mr. Scott did not shoot young Christopher Cervini for breaking into his car, but for attacking him. While the Cervini family may now be in much pain over the loss of their son, he brought himself to his tragic end through a series of terrible choices. Roderick Scott had every right to protect himself; he did what he should have… and a jury of his peers agreed.

Oh, and Roderick Scott was a 42 year old black man about the size of an NFL linebacker. Christopher Cervini was a skinny, 17 year old white kid with a little bit of marijuana in his system. Scott was justified in the killing of the younger man not because of the crime that Cervini had committed, but because Scott rightfully feared for his own safety.

There was no “white uproar” over the shooting of a young white man at the hands of a black man with a “hero-complex.” The NAACP didn’t show up to argue that the shooter should be jailed, or that the Justice Department should pursue charges of civil rights violations against the man for killing Cervini. Jesse Jackson, Al Shartpon, and all of the other race hate baiters stayed home for the trial. The trial was treated as a tragic situation that a young man brought on himself by turning to violence."

 

Roderick-Scott-right-courtesy-ynn.com_.j

 

35575021_132445075050.jpg

 

 

Wonder where the death threats, the media outrage and liberal "justice" went on that one..
Oh.. it wasn't white on black.. it was black on white.. so that's A OK! No need for outrage.. the system WORKED



#490 Gaara sama

Gaara sama

    Neowinian

  • 748 posts
  • Joined: 20-February 10

Posted 19 August 2013 - 14:32

And you are ignoring the fact that most violent crime is committed by young minority kids on other minorities, as in this case but especially blacks on other blacks.

Just recently a Detroit high school kid about the same age as Martin was killed by an elderly man. That kid and another were physically accosting 2 high school girls on their way to their car after cheerleading practice. The elderly man intervened and was attacked. He responded using his legally carried weapon. Not one word of controversy, no calls prosecution from the usual suspects (Sharpton, Jackson, the media etc.) No media circus. No prosecution. No threat of a civil rights case.

Why? The elderly man was also black. They call it hypocrisy.

what to talk about violencia? .. you should back in the 1950 up white  just kill and rape black woman just cuz the color. .. is that a criminal?  how you like this apple.? lol 



#491 DocM

DocM

    Neowinian Senior

  • 17,904 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 19 August 2013 - 18:12

1) learn English and proper grammar.

2) the white racism of the "old days" was wrong, period. I marched in the 1960's to end it, along with many other whites - Republican, Democrat and independent.

And FYI - the Civil Rights Act would not have passed without Republican votes. Pres. Johnson was faced with half the Democrats in Congress opposing it. Republicans put it over the top.

3) the black racism being expressed today by the Sharpton-esq race-baiters in this case, the New Black Panthers etc.IS NO LESS WRONG!!