Jump to content



Photo

  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 +V-Tech

V-Tech

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,060 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 05
  • Location: 127.0.0.1
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Nexus 5

Posted 17 July 2013 - 12:14

google-antitrust-eu.jpg

 

The European Union's antitrust chief, Joaquin Almunia, told a news conference today that the commission had deemed Google's recent concession offer insufficient. According to a Reuters report, Almunia has written a letter directly to Eric Schmidt demanding that the company "present better proposals", following the antitrust inquiry into Google's search and page ranking behavior. "After an analysis of the market test that was concluded on June 27, I concluded that the proposals that Google sent to us are not enough to overcome our concerns."
 
These changes, which would be enacted in the next five years, included more labelling of links that promote Googles own search services (like shopping), along the lines of showing that they are promoted placements. There would also be more graphical separation of the above links -- again, like how you see promoted ads in the search results page. The company would also offer the ability for rival search sites to tag their results so that Google would be unable to improve its own search offering by indexing those pages. Given other recent issues between Google and some European countries, the proposals also touched on offering a way for publishers to control exactly what part of their content is used in Google News.
 
The search giant's proposals were handed to the European Commission back in April, following its three-year investigation, with the regulator involving both Google's rivals and third parties in its decision-making process. We've reached out to Mountain View for comment and will tell you more when we hear it, and you can check out some of those rejected proposals at the More Coverage link.

 

 

 



#2 gameboy1977

gameboy1977

    Neowinian

  • 912 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 05
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8

Posted 17 July 2013 - 17:49

Google is really monopoly company at 10 times then direct to go to jail for sure, because of 90% share markets. EU will find Google guilty for monopoly. I agree with this.

 

http://gs.statcounte...01-20130630-map

 

You see that China blocked google serch engine long time ago.



#3 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 16,045 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3 with Galaxy Gear

Posted 17 July 2013 - 17:56

Google is really monopoly company then direct to go to jail for sure. EU will find Google gulity for monopoly. I agree with this.

Fines are only issued as a last resort and Google will likely be able to avoid any fine if it submits an acceptable proposal to the EC and abides by it. What many don't appreciate is that Microsoft wasn't fined for its abusing its market position with regards to Internet Explorer but for violating the terms of the legally binding EC agreement.

 

There is little doubt that Google has abused its market influence and I am glad that the EU is taking this matter seriously.



#4 gameboy1977

gameboy1977

    Neowinian

  • 912 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 05
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8

Posted 17 July 2013 - 20:09

China already blocked Google at it's great wall.

 

google_tibet.jpg



#5 +Phouchg

Phouchg

    Random Oracle

  • 5,572 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 11
  • Location: Tannhäuser Gate
  • OS: V'Ger 6.1.7601 x64
  • Phone: SQNY D5503

Posted 17 July 2013 - 21:08

As much as I'd like to condemn Google, because they are just another evil corporation, their results are really screwed up sometimes (according to my perspective), and also it's a bit unfair only Microsoft seems to be getting all the butt-end from Almunia thus far, are there any actual laws Google has broken? That seems to be the problem again - it's near-monopoly, but that's it.



#6 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,384 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 18 July 2013 - 06:14

Google is really monopoly company at 10 times then direct to go to jail for sure, because of 90% share markets. EU will find Google guilty for monopoly. I agree with this.

 

http://gs.statcounte...01-20130630-map

 

You see that China blocked google serch engine long time ago.

 

China blocked Google because Google refused to comply with their demands to censor search results, not because of monopoly issues.


As much as I'd like to condemn Google, because they are just another evil corporation, their results are really screwed up sometimes (according to my perspective), and also it's a bit unfair only Microsoft seems to be getting all the butt-end from Almunia thus far, are there any actual laws Google has broken? That seems to be the problem again - it's near-monopoly, but that's it.

 

Yes there are. Their new privacy policy breaks multiple EU data protection laws.



#7 +Phouchg

Phouchg

    Random Oracle

  • 5,572 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 11
  • Location: Tannhäuser Gate
  • OS: V'Ger 6.1.7601 x64
  • Phone: SQNY D5503

Posted 18 July 2013 - 09:32

Yes there are. Their new privacy policy breaks multiple EU data protection laws.

 

Am I not understanding correctly that this case is not about their privacy policies but ranking of search results?



#8 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,384 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 18 July 2013 - 12:20

Am I not understanding correctly that this case is not about their privacy policies but ranking of search results?

 

Ah, wrong case. My mistake.



#9 gameboy1977

gameboy1977

    Neowinian

  • 912 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 05
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8

Posted 18 July 2013 - 16:56

can you believe this picture?

 

de-google-chrome-666-2d326bd.jpg



#10 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,384 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 18 July 2013 - 17:51

You DO realise that the correct so called "number of the beast" isn't actually 666, right?



#11 gameboy1977

gameboy1977

    Neowinian

  • 912 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 05
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8

Posted 18 July 2013 - 18:05

yes, it is number of beast.



#12 +techbeck

techbeck

    Neowinian Senior

  • 17,863 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 18 July 2013 - 18:26

yes, it is number of beast.

 

http://en.wikipedia....er_of_the_beast

 

Regardless, it is silly to call any company evil and to much is read into the logo.



#13 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,384 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 18 July 2013 - 20:45

yes, it is number of beast.

 

1. No it isn't, it's 616

2. It's all complete nonsense anyway, no matter what number you think it is. There's no such thing as a beast



#14 Star-Pirate

Star-Pirate

    Privateer

  • 298 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 13
  • Location: Manchester, UK
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate

Posted 18 July 2013 - 20:58

1. No it isn't, it's 616

2. It's all complete nonsense anyway, no matter what number you think it is. There's no such thing as a beast

The truth of matter those who saw the supposed number of the beast where in dreams, and according to so called dream specialists we see numbers upside down in dreams... so the actual number would be 999.



#15 gameboy1977

gameboy1977

    Neowinian

  • 912 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 05
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8

Posted 31 July 2013 - 00:32

this is latest news:

 

EU regulator intensifies scrutiny of Google search results

 

http://finance.yahoo...-173513988.html





Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!