'You will have to shoot through the baby to get me'

[thomastmc]

If you have to ask "What's next" then your argument is effectively just hot air. I didn't suggest we do those things you mentioned, One thing doesn't automatically mean it leads to another. People opposing gay marriage were spouting "What's next? Beastiality?" I mean look at the checks you have to go to adopt a Child, they assess you as parents, they assess your home for suitability. And make a decision. Many animal shelters also have these checks before they'll let you adopt. Checks like this would help cut down on Chavettes who already have 17 kids and use them as leverage for more benefits and to move up the ladder for Council Housings.

Absolutely, but mandatory parenting classes in school might go a long way towards helping.  And I don't mean just proper sex education either. I mean actual classes about raising a child; at least a term/semester's worth.

A lot of these are really prudent measures.

This best criticism against something like this is the conundrum of reasonable enforcement and consequences. You couldn't just take peoples' kids away.

I would say, if somebody has a kid without a license they should be fined (say $1-2000) and not allowed to take the baby home until they've undergone a mandatory parenting, health, and care class that must be completed within 2 weeks, and they must foot the extra hospital expense for that period. Also, they'd be required to attend more classes at a later date with another fine as penalty if they do not.

[illage3]

Selfish parent.  A good and decent parent should take a bullet for their kids, this woman is disgusting and she shouldn't be allowed to be a parent.

[AnotherITguy]

Wow, I mean freaking really?  this chick sounds like a whack job, id save the tax payers some cash, send her to china to a hard labor camp.

[Growled Member]

People sure do some crazy crap these days.