Subway Employee Puts His Penis On Sandwich Bread

By Hum
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

A Subway "sandwich artist" admitted today to putting his penis on the store's sandwich bread and posting the photo on Instagram.

The bombshell comes after HuffPost Weird News received several photos posted by two men in Columbus, Ohio, who work for the restaurant chain. Their Twitter and Instagram pages are festooned with photos of their exploits (see below). In several photos, Subway's signature bread is shaped into penises.

One of the men, Cameron Boggs, admitted on Instagram that "today at work I froze my pee" in a water bottle.

Boggs posted -- and later deleted -- the most incriminating photo, which depicts a man rubbing his genitalia on foot-long bread. It was posted on Instagram by username "weedpriest" with a caption that reads, "My name is @ianjett and I will be your sandwich artist today."

In an exclusive interview with HuffPost Weird News, Ian Jett copped to defiling the footlong, but denied doing the dirty deed at work.

"I would never do that at work -- it was at home," he said. "This isn't something I'd ever do at Subway. It was totally a joke."

Store employees confirmed that Boggs and Jett currently work at the Subway location at Tuttle Crossing Boulevard in Columbus.

Boggs and Jett were fired on Monday, and a representative from Subway public relations released this statement:

    This isolated incident is not representative of SUBWAY Sandwich Artist. These actions are not tolerated and the franchisee took immediate action to terminate the two employees involved.

more

post-37120-0-24356000-1374618062.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rising Star

Silpheed2K

Posted
Posted

It's good news to hear people taking food safety seriously these days. At least it's not as bad as the man who had a deadly virus and then began sharing his biological juices in the food, infecting a lot of other people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Rippleman

Posted
Posted

if i was the specific subway franchise owner, I would sue them for whatever damages you could get out the stupid kids. If it took them the rest of their life to pay for it, well, I guess you can call it a life-long lesson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Atomic Wanderer Chicken

Posted
Posted

This guy must have the mind of a kindergartener to do something like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mentor

thomastmc

Posted
Posted

if i was the specific subway franchise owner, I would sue them for whatever damages you could get out the stupid kids. If it took them the rest of their life to pay for it, well, I guess you can call it a life-long lesson.

 

Yeah i think Subway should sue them.

 

 

If we started suing dumb teens 20-30 years ago for everything they did that was stupid, everyone on this forum would be broke, including me. If you can't think of one thing you did that was stupid when you were a teen, you're an amnesiac victim.

 

This is a classic example of "look at them, but don't look at me".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Rippleman

Posted
Posted

If we started suing dumb teens 20-30 years ago for everything they did that was stupid, everyone on this forum would be broke, including me. If you can't think of one thing you did that was stupid when you were a teen, you're an amnesiac victim.

 

This is a classic example of "look at them, but don't look at me".

of course i did stupid things, but never anything that affected anyone but myself... so I still say sue... could I be wrong? yes

  • ZakO and Dick Montage
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mentor

thomastmc

Posted
Posted

of course i did stupid things, but never anything that affected anyone but myself... so I still say sue... could I be wrong? yes

 

From the perspective of a teen, this is something that only effects him. Whether something only effects you or not is a very subjective determination.

 

A lot of this has to do with expecting more from kids than they're capable of, and punishing kids like adults instead of like kids.

 

Kids shouldn't be allowed to work in restaurants without constant adult supervision. The responsibility of ensuring that the kids don't do something stupid lies with the adult on the scene, and the restaurant, not the kids.

 

This is as much Subway's fault as the kid's. That's the expense of extremely cheap teen labor, and they're paying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Rippleman

Posted
Posted

doesn't

 

From the perspective of a teen, this is something that only effects him. Whether something only effects you or not is a very subjective determination.

 

A lot of this has to do with expecting more from kids than they're capable of, and punishing kids like adults instead of like kids.

 

Kids shouldn't be allowed to work in restaurants without constant adult supervision. The responsibility of ensuring that the kids don't do something stupid lies with the adult on the scene, and the restaurant, not the kids.

 

This is as much Subway's fault as the kid's. That's the expense of extremely cheap teen labor, and they're paying it.

doesn't appear they are actually "teens" but rather men.... guessing 21-26 of age... are you suggesting they "didn't know what they were doing?" even at that age? I still would sue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mentor

thomastmc

Posted
Posted

doesn't appear they are actually "teens" but rather men.... guessing 21-26 of age... are you suggesting they "didn't know what they were doing?" even at that age? I still would sue.

 

You're right and I apologize. I assumed that they were teens and was wrong.

 

Suing is an overly convenient response, especially these days, but you'd likely get nothing in any case. It's frivolous. Subway could've been sued though if he had served that bread.

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-4262705.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Rippleman

Posted
Posted

You're right and I apologize. I assumed that they were teens and was wrong.

 

Suing is an overly convenient response, especially these days, but you'd likely get nothing in any case. It's frivolous. Subway could've been sued though if he had served that bread.

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-4262705.html

i called them kids in the begining too based on their actions, had to Google a bit before i seen their photos... just young immature punks is all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mentor

thomastmc

Posted
Posted

i called them kids in the begining too based on their actions, had to Google a bit before i seen their photos... just young immature punks is all...

 

I was half cocked and all fired up with no place to go on that one :)

 

It's almost always teens that do this stuff, and it didn't even occur to me that they might not be until you asked the question. I read through a few different publications of the story, and didn't find their ages, but they always referred to him as "the man". After looking at some posts on social media (probably the same as you saw) they were obviously like you said, probably in their early to mid 20's. And yes, they should have totally known better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing