Kennedy assassination: Did the Secret Service agent do it?


Recommended Posts

Well, when the Kennedy files are released due to the FOIA in 2017 we'll see what questions get answered.. or not

 

Id give long odds on any relevant documentation being released any time within this presidency,possible a small chance when you get a female in the big chair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The closest you will get in this life, has been posted in this thread. ;)

 

 

So which theory is the right one again? Or are they all correct because at the moment of assassination a rip in the space-time continuum opened up and several other universe converged with ours making several different realities all true? Including the one where Kennedy was actually assassinated by "Roswell" aliens in a retaliation attack for us conducting experiments on one of their crashed pilots. That one is my favourite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the 'truth' was released by the government, few would believe it.

I honestly don't want the burden of knowing. Because if I knew, I'd forever have to be worried about who might find out that I knew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly don't want the burden of knowing. Because if I knew, I'd forever have to be worried about who might find out that I knew.

 

But you already know the truth. He was murdered by Lee Harvey Oswald, who was then murdered by a fanatic bent on revenge.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hey, it's a damn sight more believable than any of the ridiculous alternatives out there.  Seriously.  IF there had been a plot, after all this time, someone would have talked.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you already know the truth. He was murdered by Lee Harvey Oswald, who was then murdered by a fanatic bent on revenge.

 

That is the official, government sanction truth. We will never know the real truth. I, for one, do not believe anything my government tells me because they have been known to lie.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the official, government sanction truth. We will never know the real truth. I, for one, do not believe anything my government tells me because they have been known to lie.

yes, that is true. USA government  always hide stuff from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Oswald was sitting in the 2nd floor lunch room at the time of the assassination.

 

There were 4 shooters firing at JFK.

 

In case of failure to get Kennedy at Dealey Plaza, they had a second team to try again at the Trademart.

4 shooters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Yup, 1, Daltex building, 2, 6th floor SBD building, 3, triple-overpass, 4, 'grassy knoll' behind wooden fence.

 

Malcolm E. "Mac" Wallace (LBJ's hit man) was in the 6th floor window nest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Yup, 1, Daltex building, 2, 6th floor SBD building, 3, triple-overpass, 4, 'grassy knoll' behind wooden fence.

 

Malcolm E. "Mac" Wallace (LBJ's hit man) was in the 6th floor window nest.

 

So LBJ had JFK killed... Yet we've only been told of one dictionary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ LBJ was in on it, but not the sole conspirator.

 

It was a blend of some Military, CIA, Mafia, oil men.

 

Kennedy was pulling us out of Vietnam, which military leaders and CIA did not want.

 

Mafia was being prosecuted by Bobby Kennedy.

 

Big oil did not like their profits being cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ LBJ was in on it, but not the sole conspirator.

 

It was a blend of some Military, CIA, Mafia, oil men.

 

Kennedy was pulling us out of Vietnam, which military leaders and CIA did not want.

 

Mafia was being prosecuted by Bobby Kennedy.

 

Big oil did not like their profits being cut.

 

 

Is there anything proving this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regard to the assumed Grassy Knoll assassin,its an odd shooting position to take given that there would be lots of witnesses in the area and it was not much higher than road level.

 

 

a5a767e6d806fc04c5250213ec695581.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did JFK wanted to fired Mr. Edgar J. Hoover?  Yes, but Mr. Hoover sneak to Oswald to kill JFK. I remember I watched true story movie about RFK and JFK. Same thing to RFK, because of Nixion was going to lose when RFK wants to win president in 1968.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

J.F. Kennedy was the last real president of the United States who was succeeded by mere figure-heads, actors, and teleprompter readers.

 

 

Not true.  Johnson and Nixon did not either.  Ford and Carter probably didn't either.

 

Nixon memorized his speeches.  And Nixon, despite his paranoia and hyper-competitive-ism that got him into trouble, was a brilliant man.  At least technically he was.  I think Carter had a good heart... just thought he could really change things when frankly the things he really wanted to change were simply outside of his power, even as president.  Rail against the machine and the machine chews you up and spits you out.

---

...oh... and be careful what you say about my Masonic brethren...  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because a President wants to make changes to heads of departments does not mean those same people would take such extreme steps to stay in office.Had there been so much co-operation between covert,overt departments and mafia figures then someone somewhere would have spoken up by now.

 

If such did happen we are not talking a few people there are planner,co-coordinators,spotters and gunmen all in all some twenty to thirty people who all would have a piece to the puzzle.As it is its all circumstantial hearsay and no real hard evidence.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did JFK wanted to fired Mr. Edgar J. Hoover?  Yes, but Mr. Hoover sneak to Oswald to kill JFK. I remember I watched true story movie about RFK and JFK. Same thing to RFK, because of Nixion was going to lose when RFK wants to win president in 1968.

 

Dude, movies ARE NOT TRUE STORIES, no matter how much they make claims to that. They're dramatized and often heavily fictionalised accounts of the writers interpretation of events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ The evidence is only what you make of it. ;)

 

 

 

 

Evidence isn't supposed to be subjective. Actual, that is the exact opposite of what evidence is.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.