Jump to content



Photo

Elementary OS Luna released today

linux elementary luna

  • Please log in to reply
159 replies to this topic

#31 Ambroos

Ambroos

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 7
  • Joined: 16-January 06
  • Location: Belgium
  • OS: Windows 7 + 8.1
  • Phone: Sony Xperia Z2

Posted 11 August 2013 - 16:41

Elementary is really really nice. I used beta 2 for a month at work on my Linux machine since I didn't really like Gnome/Unity/XFCE/KDE. Elementary is brilliantly made, it looks great, is fast, and multitasking is a breeze. Once you know the keyboard shortcuts for workspaces and set yourself a few mouse hot corners you just fly through it.

 

If I was to switch to Linux it'd be to Elementary. Whenever I'll have to use Linux again for work or school it'll be Elementary too. You basically get the best of two worlds: the extreme versatility of Linux with the best looks and multitasking mechanics from all other operating systems combined.

 

If I didn't need Lightroom I'd probably switch from Windows 7 to Elementary permanently, everything else simply works in Linux nowadays (even Office 2010 works great through Wine!).




#32 vetsanctified

sanctified

    Your order is meaningless. My chaos is significant.

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 29-November 01
  • Location: ø
  • OS: OS X 10.10 and Xubuntu 14.04
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 11 August 2013 - 19:32

Installed it last night, totally replaced my previous GNU/Linux install.

 

This is the future of GNU/Linux.

 

The development commitment showed by these guys it's amazing. They built their own DE, compositing engine, file manager and core apps, the result is something that we rarely, if ever, see on GNU/Linux: An approximation to GUI coherence.

 

I would like to make a review later this week.



#33 +Karl L.

Karl L.

    xorangekiller

  • Tech Issues Solved: 15
  • Joined: 24-January 09
  • Location: Virginia, USA
  • OS: Debian Testing

Posted 11 August 2013 - 19:41

The development commitment showed by these guys it's amazing. They built their own DE, compositing engine, file manager and core apps, the result is something that we rarely, if ever, see on GNU/Linux: An approximation to GUI coherence.

One of the things I really like about the Elementary OS team is that they took the time to do things right. I have a lot of respect for that, and much more confidence in their future than distributions that have high technical debt or are stretching themselves too thin (such as Linux Mint, on both counts). Their level of dedication is very impressive. Although it is very unlikely that I will switch away from Debian as my main OS, I will definitely give this release of Elementary OS a try.



#34 chrisj1968

chrisj1968

    copyrighted!! ©

  • Tech Issues Solved: 3
  • Joined: 17-June 08
  • Location: United States

Posted 11 August 2013 - 19:47

sort of makes you feel like there's a 500lb mafia hitman with his .45 pulled on you to guilt you into paying.

 

it's one thing for the site to say it isn't .  :s

 

 

 

We're driven by a desire to be better, not by a paycheck. Contributors aren't profit-maximizers, they're purpose-maximizers.


#35 Knive Party

Knive Party

    To Death

  • Joined: 25-June 07
  • OS: Windows 8.1 update 3
  • Phone: Galaxy S2 CM

Posted 11 August 2013 - 19:48

so far this is one hell of a polished OS. things feels well put together. I for one am grateful to get to use this. 



#36 vetsanctified

sanctified

    Your order is meaningless. My chaos is significant.

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 29-November 01
  • Location: ø
  • OS: OS X 10.10 and Xubuntu 14.04
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 11 August 2013 - 19:51

sort of makes you feel like there's a 500lb mafia hitman with his .45 pulled on you to guilt you into paying.

 

it's one thing for the site to say it isn't .  :s

 

Come on, thats an exaggeration, the link for the free download is clearly visible.

 

And anyway, 10 bucks it's nothing, we always complain that the GNU/Linux does nothing notable outside their own paradigm. eOS is trying to do that, lets support them.



#37 +MikeChipshop

MikeChipshop

    Miniman

  • Tech Issues Solved: 3
  • Joined: 02-October 06
  • Location: Scotland
  • OS: Windows 8, iOS, Android, WP8
  • Phone: HTC 8X / Nexus 5

Posted 11 August 2013 - 19:58

First thoughts... "Dayem, Apple are going to have a field day". 

Thought's after a couple of days... "Dayem this is actual really nice, far nicer than OSX"

 

To any one like me, i'll admit it, who watched the promo video and though it looked like a bad OSX rip, it's far far nicer. I'd say it's more polished and better to use too.



#38 +Karl L.

Karl L.

    xorangekiller

  • Tech Issues Solved: 15
  • Joined: 24-January 09
  • Location: Virginia, USA
  • OS: Debian Testing

Posted 11 August 2013 - 20:10

What might benefit some distributions, such as Elementary OS, is the Debian Blends project. The idea behind Debian Pure Blends is to have teams within Debian that focus on features for a specific target group. The primary advantage to this approach, as opposed to creating a derivative distribution, is that Debian takes care the infrastructure and security of the OS a whole while allowing a blend team to focus on features specifically for their target audience unabated. Not only does this make Debian better while implicitly benefiting derivatives, but it also removes the majority of the workload and cost associated with the production of an OS through the use of Debian's established infrastructure. SPI (the foundation associated with Debian) has far greater resources and support than most of these distributions can hope to muster. Theoretically if Elementary OS chose this route they would not feel they have to ask for donations because their direct costs would be slim-to-none. It seems like a win-win situation, unless I'm missing something critical in my analysis.



#39 .Neo

.Neo

    Generic User

  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • OS: OS X Yosemite
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 11 August 2013 - 20:18

How cute, they even copied the space-based desktop picture. This distro could become great, but they really need to take the UI in another direction. If not, they'll always be that OS X clone.

 

It's a real shame though commercial app makers still aren't investing much in Linux. I would love to install something like this or Ubuntu on my mom's laptop (she absolutely despises Windows), but LibreOffice just isn't cutting it. That's the show stopper.



#40 Max Norris

Max Norris

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 22
  • Joined: 20-February 11
  • OS: Windows 2012R2, 7, BSD Unix
  • Phone: HTC One (Work) Lumia 1020 (Home)

Posted 11 August 2013 - 20:41

Toyed with the live CD a bit earlier.. aside from the obvious OSX feel which was mentioned a few times, personally I found it actually quite good and a nice level of polish, but a few of the basics that I would prefer to have aren't available. Only messed with it for a few minutes so maybe I'm missing something, always possible. Little things like creating links in the file manager without having to bring up a console, pinning a specific folder to the dock, a "global" view for the file manager instead of each directory having it's own, jumplist-like functionality, etc... not a fan of "just the basics" file managers, haven't yet tried pulling in something like Nemo either. Curious if the dock can be made into a more traditional taskbar layout as well, was never a fan of docks to begin with. A few niggles aside I think it's actually pretty good, just need to expand on the functionality a bit more.

#41 Ambroos

Ambroos

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 7
  • Joined: 16-January 06
  • Location: Belgium
  • OS: Windows 7 + 8.1
  • Phone: Sony Xperia Z2

Posted 11 August 2013 - 20:43

How cute, they even copied the space-based desktop picture. This distro could become great, but they really need to take the UI in another direction. If not, they'll always be that OS X clone.

 

It's a real shame though commercial app makers still aren't investing much in Linux. I would love to install something like this or Ubuntu on my mom's laptop (she absolutely despises Windows), but LibreOffice just isn't cutting it. That's the show stopper.

Have you tried it? That wallpaper is just used in that one video, the included wallpapers are actually quite a bit different.

 

What does it have in common with OSX? A dock (with one similar animation), and the window elements look slightly like those on OSX. Aside that it's completely different.



#42 .Neo

.Neo

    Generic User

  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • OS: OS X Yosemite
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 11 August 2013 - 20:48

What does it have in common with OSX? A dock (with one similar animation), and the window elements look slightly like those on OSX. Aside that it's completely different.

Sure, of course... Things like the launcher and System Settings are basically a 1:1 rip-off of the Dock and System Preferences. Same goes for the folder design, full-screen buttons, toolbar buttons, sidebar design, pop-up windows, round load indicator, progress indicator nob, Smart Playlist symbol, etc. They even cloned Exposé. It goes a lot further than simply coincidence or "slightly like it".

 

I don't really care though the developers are going for an OS X meets iOS clone, but it's kinda ridiculous that you're trying to downplay things the way you do. ;)



#43 Syanide

Syanide

    From here to infirmary.

  • Joined: 05-February 03
  • Location: /home

Posted 11 August 2013 - 21:51

Yeah, I think it's only fair to say they're heavily "inspired" by Apple. But if you're gonna steal, you might as well steal from the best. I'm sure that if the project gets at least some level of success, we'll see them figuring stuff on their own and developing their own style.

 

Personally, I'd give my left nut to run this thing or Ubuntu full time, but I'm stuck with Adobe's CS for work :'(



#44 PGHammer

PGHammer

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 31-August 03
  • Location: Accokeek, MD
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center x64

Posted 11 August 2013 - 22:17

This is the most incoherent post I've seen on Neowin in a while.

 

Pantheon is not a fork of GNOME, it's just written with GTK, just as Viper mentioned, even Xfce uses GTK for underlying apps, but it doesn't have anything to do with GNOME. The second part of your post really makes no sense whatsoever so it's hard for me to comment on it.

 

TL;DR - This distro has nothing to do with GNOME.

And you are mis-interpreting the point I am trying to make.

 

I did NOT say that the distribution itself had anything to do with it - I simply said that Pantheon in Elementary is the closest any distribution to date has to an unforked/vanilla GNOME 3 as a DE, as practically any other DE (and especially those running any version of GNOME) has put a unique or semi-unique spin or fork into it as a branding scheme.  That could indeed be what Elementary OS tried to do with Luna, as the very definition (in dictionary terms) of "elementary" is that of a primary (as in education or "beginner") level.  Why is that necessarily a bad thing - especially since that is something that basic Ubuntu got wrong?



#45 vetsanctified

sanctified

    Your order is meaningless. My chaos is significant.

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 29-November 01
  • Location: ø
  • OS: OS X 10.10 and Xubuntu 14.04
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 11 August 2013 - 22:23

And you are mis-interpreting the point I am trying to make.

 

I did NOT say that the distribution itself had anything to do with it - I simply said that Pantheon in Elementary is the closest any distribution to date has to an unforked/vanilla GNOME 3 as a DE, as practically any other DE (and especially those running any version of GNOME) has put a unique or semi-unique spin or fork into it as a branding scheme.  That could indeed be what Elementary OS tried to do with Luna, as the very definition (in dictionary terms) of "elementary" is that of a primary (as in education or "beginner") level.  Why is that necessarily a bad thing - especially since that is something that basic Ubuntu got wrong?

 

I was mis-interpretating you too, however now I get you and I agree.