Recommended Posts

London (CNN) -- A newly revealed claim of conspiracy in the death of Princess Diana has royal watchers buzzing once again, nearly 16 years after the woman who would now be a royal grandmother died in a Paris car crash.

But British police seem to be knocking down the claim -- that the British military was involved in the deaths of Diana, her boyfriend and driver in August 1997.

"This is not a re-investigation," London police tersely stressed in a statement that revealed none of what it had been told.

The claim appears to have been sent first to military authorities and then London police by the parents-in-law of a British special forces sniper after his marriage had fallen apart, according to an article on the website of the Sunday People newspaper. It did not offer a source for its reporting.

Sunday People said it had seen a seven-page handwritten letter by the in-laws alleging that the soldier, whom the newspaper did not name, had boasted to his wife that the elite British Special Air Service commando unit was behind the deaths.

The U.K.'s Ministry of Defence told CNN only that "this is for Metropolitan Police to investigate."

Yet the deaths have always been paired with conspiracy theories accusing British and French intelligence services and members of British royalty of orchestrating her death.

more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why they would want to kill off the most popular of the Royals.

You never know. Maybe she knew something and someone was afraid she was about to spill the beans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why they would want to kill off the most popular of the Royals.

 

Conspiracy theorists go with the Royal Family didn't want someone from the Middle East to be King of England, or in the royal family whatever. Apparently it was against the Queens wishes that Diana had Emad El-Din Mohamed Abdel Moneim Fayed as her boyfriend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if someone in the government was behind her death, that knowledge will never see the light of day except as rumors.

 

The only person responsible for her death was the drunk driver of their car.

 

I'll bet you ten bucks the source of this new rumour is Al Fayed. He's never been able to accept that his son died in a simple accident caused by a drunk driver.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 It did not offer a source for its reporting.

whom the newspaper did not name,

 

 

 

Real compelling stuff there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conspiracy theorists go with the Royal Family didn't want someone from the Middle East to be King of England, or in the royal family whatever. Apparently it was against the Queens wishes that Diana had

Emad El-Din Mohamed Abdel Moneim Fayed as her boyfriend.

How does that even remotely make any sense? Diana had no link to the thrown, not even through her kids. Fayed had zero chance, period.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about flogging a dead horse. No disrespect or pun intended.

Sick to the absolute hilt of these stupid Diana conspiracies. Seems like theres at least 2-3 yearly in the British press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does that even remotely make any sense? Diana had no link to the thrown, not even through her kids. Fayed had zero chance, period.

 

Since when do conspiracy theorist loons EVER consider sense in their drivel?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why they would want to kill off the most popular of the Royals.

 

There's a long list of reasons that she was a potential threat to the Royal Family, but I still believe it was just the driver of the car who was at fault.

 

Either way, if there is any form of coverup, we will NEVER know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean you dont believe him.............Im astounded  :rolleyes:  :laugh:

I've known about lizard people for years, the Simpsons  told me about their existence years ago:

 

5FyNuNY.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.