12 posts in this topic

Tiny New Moon Discovered around Neptune

 

tiny-new-moon-discovered_1.jpg

This diagram shows the orbits of several moons located close to the planet Neptune. All of them were discovered in 1989 by NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft, with the exception of S/2004 N 1, which was discovered in archival Hubble Space Telescope images. Image: NASA, ESA, and A. Feild (STScI)

 

The Hubble Space Telescope has revealed a small, never-before-seen moon around Neptune, boosting the giant blue planet's total satellite count to 14 satellites, new photos reveal.

 

The newfound Neptune moon ? called S/2004 N 1 ? was discovered July 1 during a fresh analysis of older Hubble Space Telescope images, scientists said. The newly discovered satellite is Neptune's smallest known moon and is just 12 miles (19 kilometers) wide.

 

Hubble telescope scientists announced the new Neptune moon's discovery today (July 15). The small satellite wasn't easy to find.

 

"The moons and arcs [segments of rings around the planet] orbit very quickly, so we had to devise a way to follow their motion in order to bring out the details of the system," SETI Institute scientist Mark Showalter, the moon's discoverer, said in a statement. "It's the same reason a sports photographer tracks a running athlete ? the athlete stays in focus, but the background blurs."

 

Source and more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The newly discovered satellite is Neptune's smallest known moon and is just 12 miles (19 kilometers) wide.

 

Is that big enough to classify as a moon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that big enough to classify as a moon?

 

That's what I thought, more on the lines of space junk than moon. Sounds more like a mini asteroid locked in orbit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure the rule is simply if the satellite is orbiting the thing it's considered a moon. But yeah that seems super small.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they're going to call that a moon, they need to put Pluto back as a planet.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems way super small!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they're going to call that a moon, they need to put Pluto back as a planet.

 

I was going to say that also!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they're going to call that a moon, they need to put Pluto back as a planet.

 

Or just write it as a Moon for decades in the History Books and then change their damn minds and say it's a Dwarf Moon just to **** with people. Cosmologists are the worst kind of trolls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that big enough to classify as a moon?

There is no size requirements for moons. If it orbits the planet, be it naturally formed, or a captured asteroid, it's still a moon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's no moon -- it's the Death Star !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's no moon -- it's the Death Star !

Manned by midgets? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.