Jump to content

73 posts in this topic

Posted

 Well gee let me see here. You think a criminal that owns a gun isn't  Going to use his gun to murder someone? Also when you have a dangerous object people will be hurt. It's no different than people who get behind the wheel of a car and have a wreck for one reason or another. 

 

So I see no issue here.  Also that link mentions some gun policy group aka anti gun group.

 

Nice. Ask for statistics and the just brush them off. Should have expected it really. 

 

The study was carried out by the University of Pennsylvania not an anti-gun policy group.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Nice. Ask for statistics and the just brush them off. Should have expected it really. 

 

The study was carried out by the University of Pennsylvania not an anti-gun policy group.

And if you know anything about American universities they are mostly liberal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Should have shopped at Waitrose....
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This would never happen with a pc game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This would never happen with a pc game

Lol, yeah it would but the thug would be like damn its the pc version and throw it down lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

And if you know anything about American universities they are mostly liberal. 

 

Liberal is not a dirty word.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Liberal is not a dirty word.

 It is when it comes to certain things. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

 It is when it comes to certain things. 

 

Only to most Americans, and I say that as a Tory voter (Conservative).

 

Of course, I shouldn't be surprised. You lot think social care is a pariah, too.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Only to most Americans, and I say that as a Tory voter (Conservative).

 

Of course, I shouldn't be surprised. You lot think social care is a pariah, too.

I don't think its a pariah I just think that we don't have the money to pay for it right now. If our country was in better shape economically then I'd be willing to listen. It's not that I don't care about peoples health, we just can't afford it at the moment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't think its a pariah I just think that we don't have the money to pay for it right now. If our country was in better shape economically then I'd be willing to listen. It's not that I don't care about peoples health, we just can't afford it at the moment. 

 

Maybe you need to try harder to get it through your politicians thick skulls that you're not the world police, and that you really have far more pressing domestic issues to deal with than whether some Arab is trying to murder his neighbour...

 

At least then, you might have the money you guys need to start addressing such issues.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Maybe you need to try harder to get it through your politicians thick skulls that you're not the world police, and that you really have far more pressing domestic issues to deal with than whether some Arab is trying to murder his neighbour...

 

At least then, you might have the money you guys need to start addressing such issues.

There's a small movement now. I think if Rand Paul ran and won we might have a chance but you know once who ever wins gets in office its a totally new ball game. So nothing ever changes. New face,same old game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Bet the dude could have been safe if he was carrying the "PC version"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Nice. Ask for statistics and the just brush them off. Should have expected it really. 
 
The study was carried out by the University of Pennsylvania not an anti-gun policy group.


Only NRA approved and preferably performed statistics and studied are accepted of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Only NRA approved and preferably performed statistics and studied are accepted of course.

Nah, I prefer FBI stats. Those are unbiased. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't think its a pariah I just think that we don't have the money to pay for it right now. If our country was in better shape economically then I'd be willing to listen. It's not that I don't care about peoples health, we just can't afford it at the moment.


How can you not afford it. I'd say you can't afford not to.

Don't you know social healthcare provides better healthcare for everyone at a much lower cost than your current system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Nah, I prefer FBI stats. Those are unbiased.


Hah, yeah sure they are ;). Because the FBI has no agenda at all ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hah, yeah sure they are ;). Because the FBI has no agenda at all ;)

If anything the FBI would be on the side of  the anti gunners, they are a government agency after all. But they do not hold a political bias or hold an agenda. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Reminds me what happened when the PS3 first came out. I'm sure this will spread and more people will do stupid things and use GTA V as an excuse when they end up in court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It'd be funny if every street mugging got on the news like this. Since a regular street mugging is just what this is, he just happened to have a new popular video game stolen...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Nah, I prefer FBI stats. Those are unbiased. 

 

How were those statistics biased? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How were those statistics biased? 

Oh come on flinty. When you have a group that's sole purpose is gun policy, you don't think that their study will be biased towards their cause. I mean hell you discredit pro gun studies all the time and you expect me to go along with this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Oh come on flinty. When you have a group that's sole purpose is gun policy, you don't think that their study will be biased towards their cause. I mean hell you discredit pro gun studies all the time and you expect me to go along with this?

 

The University of Pennsylvania is an anti-gun policy group? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The University of Pennsylvania is an anti-gun policy group? 

 

Anyone who makes a study that says guns don't contribute to peace and happiness and pink flowers and all that is good are anti gun policy. 

 

duh ;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.