Jump to content



Photo

Popsci: Why We're Shutting Off Our Comments

comment popsci dont feed the trolls

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 spenser.d

spenser.d

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,076 posts
  • Joined: 19-December 03

Posted 26 September 2013 - 23:02

Why We're Shutting Off Our Comments

 

Starting today, PopularScience.com will no longer accept comments on new articles. Here's why.

 

nano.jpg?itok=kYYAI_h5
Wellcome Images

 

Comments can be bad for science. That's why, here at PopularScience.com, we're shutting them off.

 

It wasn't a decision we made lightly. As the news arm of a 141-year-old science and technology magazine, we are as committed to fostering lively, intellectual debate as we are to spreading the word of science far and wide. The problem is when trolls and spambots overwhelm the former, diminishing our ability to do the latter.

 

That is not to suggest that we are the only website in the world that attracts vexing commenters. Far from it. Nor is it to suggest that all, or even close to all, of our commenters are shrill, boorish specimens of the lower internet phyla. We have many delightful, thought-provoking commenters.

 

But even a fractious minority wields enough power to skew a reader's perception of a story, recent research suggests. In one study led by University of Wisconsin-Madison professor Dominique Brossard, 1,183 Americans read a fake blog post on nanotechnology and revealed in survey questions how they felt about the subject (are they wary of the benefits or supportive?). Then, through a randomly assigned condition, they read either epithet- and insult-laden comments ("If you don't see the benefits of using nanotechnology in these kinds of products, you're an idiot" ) or civil comments. The results, as

 

Brossard and coauthor Dietram A. Scheufele wrote in a New York Times op-ed:

Uncivil comments not only polarized readers, but they often changed a participant's interpretation of the news story itself.
In the civil group, those who initially did or did not support the technology — whom we identified with preliminary survey questions — continued to feel the same way after reading the comments. Those exposed to rude comments, however, ended up with a much more polarized understanding of the risks connected with the technology.
Simply including an ad hominem attack in a reader comment was enough to make study participants think the downside of the reported technology was greater than they'd previously thought.

 

Another, similarly designed study found that just firmly worded (but not uncivil) disagreements between commenters impacted readers' perception of science.

 

If you carry out those results to their logical end--commenters shape public opinion; public opinion shapes public policy; public policy shapes how and whether and what research gets funded--you start to see why we feel compelled to hit the "off" switch.

 

Even a fractious minority wields enough power to skew a reader's perception of a story.
 

A politically motivated, decades-long war on expertise has eroded the popular consensus on a wide variety of scientifically validated topics. Everything, from evolution to the origins of climate change, is mistakenly up for grabs again. Scientific certainty is just another thing for two people to "debate" on television. And because comments sections tend to be a grotesque reflection of the media culture surrounding them, the cynical work of undermining bedrock scientific doctrine is now being done beneath our own stories, within a website devoted to championing science.

 

There are plenty of other ways to talk back to us, and to each other: through Twitter, Facebook, Google+, Pinterest, livechats, email, and more. We also plan to open the comments section on select articles that lend themselves to vigorous and intelligent discussion. We hope you'll chime in with your brightest thoughts. Don't do it for us. Do it for science.

 

 

Seems like a bold move, but pretty cool if you ask me.  A lot of other sites of the same nature as theirs (news, science, etc) should follow suit.




#2 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 27 September 2013 - 00:55

Instead of punishing everyone, why not just get rid of the bad posters? That's what Neowin has done.



#3 wahoospa

wahoospa

    Neowinian

  • 854 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 07
  • Location: South Carolina

Posted 27 September 2013 - 01:19

I have never been to Popular Science but if the spammers are anything like on our local television station's web page they spam everyday, sometimes 4 times during the day. They get rid of them and they just come back using another Yahoo mail account and new password. To delete the spammers comments they have to be 'flagged' 4 times and that is for just one posting out of dozens they do. They used to do the local newspaper until they required a Facebook logon.



#4 OP spenser.d

spenser.d

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,076 posts
  • Joined: 19-December 03

Posted 27 September 2013 - 01:25

Instead of punishing everyone, why not just get rid of the bad posters? That's what Neowin has done.

 

I don't see it as punishment.  There are plenty of venues for discussion - you don't need to do it at the bottom of an article.  And Neowin comments on many main page articles aren't particularly conducive to legitimate discussion.

 

I actually would like for Neowin articles to link out to the forum for commenting instead of vice versa (front page articles show up in the forum, but they just link to the front page).



#5 Anibal P

Anibal P

    Neowinian

  • 4,362 posts
  • Joined: 11-June 02
  • Location: Waterbury CT
  • OS: Win 8.1
  • Phone: Android

Posted 27 September 2013 - 01:29

Sounds like they got tired of being called out on bad science so they killed to compensate and push whatever agenda they are pushing 



#6 vetsanctified

sanctified

    Your order is meaningless. My chaos is significant.

  • 21,068 posts
  • Joined: 29-November 01
  • Location: ø
  • OS: OS X 10.10 and Xubuntu 14.04
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 27 September 2013 - 01:36

That's what Neowin has done.

 

Are you serious?



#7 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 27 September 2013 - 02:02

Are you serious?

More serious than not. It's not perfect around here but even a comment like "are you serious" would get you banned in a lot of places. Most of the discussions here these days are tolerable. I honestly had a huge ignore file at one time and now I have none. 



#8 vetsanctified

sanctified

    Your order is meaningless. My chaos is significant.

  • 21,068 posts
  • Joined: 29-November 01
  • Location: ø
  • OS: OS X 10.10 and Xubuntu 14.04
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 27 September 2013 - 02:14

More serious than not. It's not perfect around here but even a comment like "are you serious" would get you banned in a lot of places. Most of the discussions here these days are tolerable. I honestly had a huge ignore file at one time and now I have none. 

 

I still cant tolerate the replies in threads about any phone OS or Desktop OS. There are people here who act like their phone is a religious iconography.



#9 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 27 September 2013 - 02:49

I still cant tolerate the replies in threads about any phone OS or Desktop OS. There are people here who act like their phone is a religious iconography.

 

I just can't take all this stuff seriously. I guess that's why I don't let it bother me. It's just a phone or a computer to me, nothing special. I sit back and laugh at the replies sometimes. They are so earnest.



#10 compl3x

compl3x

    Space coyote

  • 8,790 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 29 September 2013 - 19:11

Frankly, most sites should turn off commenting. It rarely adds anything to a story.

 

I was on Al Jazeera reading a topic yesterday and I was blown away by how much racist, anti-Semitic, bigoted rubbish was in the comments section. I wasn't surprised it existed; that is just another day on the internet, I was surprised that there seems to be 0% moderation of the topics.

 

 

Sounds like they got tired of being called out on bad science so they killed to compensate and push whatever agenda they are pushing 

 

 

Evidence they spread "bad science"? Seems more likely you get wackos with their idiotic agendas going onto the site and trolling the **** out of articles. Climate change is a hoax! Evolution is a scientific conspiracy to kill off Jesus! ... and so on.



#11 firey

firey

    F͎̗͉͎͈͑͡ȉ͎̣̐́ṙ͖̺͕͙̓̌è̤̞͉̟̲͇̍̍̾̓ͥͅy͓̍̎̌̏̒

  • 8,050 posts
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location: Alberta, Canada
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Android (4.4.2)

Posted 30 September 2013 - 13:03

Instead of punishing everyone, why not just get rid of the bad posters? That's what Neowin has done.

Maybe we are one different versions of Neowin.. Pretty sure trolling is still going strong here.



#12 +Chicane-UK

Chicane-UK

    Neowinian Senior

  • 9,900 posts
  • Joined: 02-November 01
  • Location: The UK!
  • OS: MacOS 10.10 Yosemite
  • Phone: Google Nexus 4

Posted 30 September 2013 - 13:15

I just can't take all this stuff seriously. I guess that's why I don't let it bother me. It's just a phone or a computer to me, nothing special. I sit back and laugh at the replies sometimes. They are so earnest.

 

The problem is, I don't have an issue with people having opinions or viewpoints on things - in fact I really enjoy discussing stuff like that on these forums. The issue is that there are people who are utterly blinkered in their viewpoints (which is a tad frustrating) but also that there are people who are just downright RUDE - I've spent time writing out a couple of paragraphs as a response to make a point, only for some stupid one liner reply like "Your butthurt" or something equally intelligent. I have to sometimes walk away from a discussion knowing I have a point to make still, but can't be bothered with that kind of idiocy. 

 

Still. Could be worse. We could have the same level of discussion as most YouTube comments... that's like staring into the eyes of the medusa :|

 

 

Maybe we are one different versions of Neowin.. Pretty sure trolling is still going strong here.

 
Very much so :( 


#13 Arceles

Arceles

    Time Craymel

  • 2,101 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 09
  • Location: 4th dimmension.
  • OS: Win 7 Ultimate / Win 8.1 Pro (With Start Menu Start8, otherwise is UNUSABLE) / Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean
  • Phone: XT890 Motorola RAZRi (x86 processor)

Posted 30 September 2013 - 13:15

Instead of punishing everyone, why not just get rid of the bad posters? That's what Neowin has done.

There are quite a few hardcore people and fanboys here, specially when anything non MS shines... over MS. (and let's not mention Intel! :D)



#14 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 30 September 2013 - 15:51

Maybe we are one different versions of Neowin.. Pretty sure trolling is still going strong here.

 

It's the Internet. I expect a certain amount of trolling. Still, I see a lot of good discussion going on here. Haters will be haters and fanboys will be fanboys. You know? 

 

 

The problem is, I don't have an issue with people having opinions or viewpoints on things - in fact I really enjoy discussing stuff like that on these forums. The issue is that there are people who are utterly blinkered in their viewpoints (which is a tad frustrating) but also that there are people who are just downright RUDE - I've spent time writing out a couple of paragraphs as a response to make a point, only for some stupid one liner reply like "Your butthurt" or something equally intelligent. I have to sometimes walk away from a discussion knowing I have a point to make still, but can't be bothered with that kind of idiocy. 

 

Still. Could be worse. We could have the same level of discussion as most YouTube comments... that's like staring into the eyes of the medusa :|

 

 

I agree, that's annoying. I get that sometimes too or someone seems to deliberately misunderstand what I'm trying to say. But I take a deep breath and consider if might be a cultural thing or a language barrier, or maybe I didn't word my thoughts properly. And sometimes I consider the poster might actually be a 12 year old begging for attention. I've found that overall if I make a valid point then some decent poster will be willing to discuss it sooner or later. I just have to ignore the shallow posters until then. It's really hard to do sometimes. 



#15 fusi0n

fusi0n

    Don't call it a come back

  • 3,901 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 04
  • OS: OSX 10.9\Windows 10\Ubuntu
  • Phone: LG G3

Posted 30 September 2013 - 15:55

eh, it's their website.. they can do whatever..maybe they will become UNPopular Science..

 

 

:rofl: