I'm wondering which GPU is better out of the two following, that as far as i know are the top of the line of low-profile graphics cards.. I don't know much about what the technical specifications mean, what is the better all round card?
Sapphire Radeon HD 7750 Low Profile 1GB
Cape Verde Pro
Core Clock Speed: 1071 MHz
512 Stream Processors
Actual Shader Performance: 332.8
Memory Speed: 1125MHz (72GB/Sec BW)
Open GL 4.2
Power Consumption: 55w
Texture Rate: 25.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units: 16
Pixel Rate: 12.8 GPixel/s
Zotac GeForce GTX 650 Low Profile 1GB
Core Clock Speed: 800 MHz
384 Stream Processors
Actual Shader Performance: 384
Memory Speed: 1250MHz (80GB/Sec BW)
Open GL 4.3
Power Consumption: not sure on exact figure but it's a lot higher than the 7750
From what i can see the 650 uses far more power than the 7750... the 650 has a much bigger clock speed, but 7750 has more shaders, then i found a value 'actual shader performance' that puts it lower than the 650.. i also found extras on the 7750 (texture rate, render output units and pixel rate) that i couldn't find on the GTX?
I'm guessing the GTX is better, but whats more important, clock speed or shaders? I currently own the 7750 which serves me OK, i noticed some lag in Black Ops 2 which was fixed by switching off antialising - it was on x4, is switched it to x2, it was better, then off was amazing but to be honest i didn't notice any difference in the graphics.
So, i think it's going to cripple on BF4 which i'll be trying later, is it worth replacing it with the GTX? I know i'm very limited with low profile graphics cards at the moment so i want to get the absolute best on the market.