Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

uk UK nuclear power plant gets go-ahead


48 posts in this topic

Posted

UK nuclear power plant gets go-ahead

 

The government has given the go-ahead for the UK's first new nuclear station in a generation.

 

France's EDF Energy will lead a consortium, which includes Chinese investors, to build the Hinkley Point C plant in Somerset.

 

Ministers say the deal will help take the UK towards low-carbon power and lower generating costs in future.

 

Critics warn guaranteeing the group a price for electricity at twice the current level will raise bills.

 

"For the first time, a nuclear station in this country will not have been built with money from the British taxpayer," said Secretary of State for Energy Edward Davey.

 

The two reactors planned for Hinkley, which will provide power for about 60 years, are a key part of the coalition's drive to shift the UK away from fossil fuels towards low-carbon power.

 

Ministers and EDF have been in talks for more than a year about the minimum price the company will be paid for electricity produced at the site, which the government estimates will cost

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Good. Modern reactors are safe, some designs being meltdown proof, they produce clean power and even if a typical leak happens they release far less radiation than a coal powered plant does 24/7/365.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

 

"For the first time, a nuclear station in this country will not have been built with money from the British taxpayer," said Secretary of State for Energy Edward Davey.

 

...and you can guarantee, to your last penny, that it'll end up costing a fortune in bills down the road to make up for it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Good. Modern reactors are safe, some designs being meltdown proof, they produce clean power and even if a typical leak happens they release far less radiation than a coal powered plant does 24/7/365.

QFT. It would be interesting to know exactly what type of reactor will be used in these projects; last time I checked there were lots of interesting tech in development.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Time to put sanctions on the UK. Seems like they are trying to build nuclear weapons. 

 

Real talk though, good for them. Nuclear is the future and it will get better and better as more research and money is put into it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Another expensive white elephant from a government that's only interested in making life easy for big business.  Ed Davey should be ashamed of himself.  This is a massive backward step at a time when sensible countries such as Germany are decommissioning nuclear plants.  Still, it should please the half wits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Despite the bad press nuclear energy is an important tool in reducing our dependence on foreign fuel and meeting internationally agreed upon emission targets to minimise the impact of climate change. My issue with this deal is that it's a lot of taxpayer money going to private companies when the UK should be investing in this itself, as is the case in France and China. Further, the UK should be committing for more reactors in order to benefit from economies of scale. There was a very interesting article on the matter in New Scientist for those interested.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Another expensive white elephant from a government that's only interested in making life easy for big business. Ed Davey should be ashamed of himself. This is a massive backward step at a time when sensible countries such as Germany are decommissioning nuclear plants. Still, it should please the half wits.

You do realize that most enviroental groups have rethought their antinuclear policies? As noted,modern designs are FAR different than the historic problem reactors.

Some physically cannot melt down, even with a complete coolant loss, and some have molten (salt + fuel) cores from the get-go so a "meltdown" is meaningless. Some designs are the size of a hot tub and require zero maintenance, allowing them to be buried for 60-80 years before being replaced & recycled. Some don't even use Uranium as the primary fuel but Thorium, which is far more abundant.

Time to catch up.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Another expensive white elephant from a government that's only interested in making life easy for big business.  Ed Davey should be ashamed of himself.  This is a massive backward step at a time when sensible countries such as Germany are decommissioning nuclear plants.  Still, it should please the half wits.

 

I saw an interesting article from the Telegraph about how Germany's green push was damaging their industrial base because their fuel bills were so high. I was gonna link it in but I can't find it now :/ I like the ideas on renewables but they aren't a perfect solution,

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The new reactors are better for nature because they also clean up 'used' fuel from other reactors and output much less quantities of radiation than they actually obtain as a fuel.

Glad at least one country in the EU still invests in it. Currently it is the cleanest way of producing electricity by far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

...and you can guarantee, to your last penny, that it'll end up costing a fortune in bills down the road to make up for it

Close; the government will be giving them a guaranteed "strike rate" of

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Close; the government will be giving them a guaranteed "strike rate" of

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I remember a report as a child that someone important said nuke plants aren't efficient in the UK as we use 220-240 volts ac.

Sorry I couldn't find a source as I mentioned this was back in the eatly 80's, Sellafield was all over the news back then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I always find it annoying how every price rise by British Gas is always announced by a very apologetic, sorry looking big wig who stresses they had no choice to do it, to stay afloat. 3 months later we're shown ecstatic looking board members partying as British Gas announce record profits yet another year in a row.

If the entire nation banded together and simply refused to lie down and accept this, so many changes could be made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I remember a report as a child that someone important said nuke plants aren't efficient in the UK as we use 220-240 volts ac.

Sorry I couldn't find a source as I mentioned this was back in the eatly 80's, Sellafield was all over the news back then.

That's ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Queue comparisons to ancient, obsolete reactors like Chernobyl and Fukishima (built along a fault line) by the antinuclear fearmongers in an attempt to stop this.

 

It's like saying all automobile production should be stopped because the 1971 Ford Pinto was so defective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Woah. I have a friend here who's worked at a local nuclear plant for the past ~30 years or so (afaik) and he told me he's going to be in the UK for a while soon to help out with this project. Very cool to see it on here and BBC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

wheres all the cold fusion reactors, plow money into that tech and it might got along alot quicker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If the entire nation banded together and simply refused to lie down and accept this, so many changes could be made.

And there lies the issue with our country. The general public are obviously mad, but they can't be arsed to take action to try and stop it. It always comes down to a small group of dedicated activists to lead protests, and they usually get ignored by the media (especially the BBC) unless violence breaks out.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That's ridiculous.

I'm sorry, I fail to see how, I'm not trying to start anything here, and ok I cannot find a source for my statement. But someone was bold enough to go on the record to say something, I can accept you may only have my word for it, and it may not hold any value as far as you're concerned.

The key point of the statement i remembered was something to do with the voltage used making them inefficient.

(Just like I remember ex Chanceller Norman Lamont admitting the revenue collected from cigarettes back in the 80's was funding over 60% of the NHS)

Just to make a clear stance, I don't have a problem with it per se, I just don't know enough about nuclear power plants to make a stance one way or the other, I was just hoping someone else might remember the story, and offer a sounding board to weigh up pros vs cons etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Oh, turns out there's a bit of irony from the Lib Dems as well from this deal. Ed Davey had this press release on his website from 2006...

 

1393722_658382387535011_1355234557_n.jpg

 

It's now suddenly disappeared after being pointed out by Another Angry Voice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

wasn't there an episode on doctor who about this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Let's hope Brussels veto's this. Bad deal for the consumer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I saw an interesting article from the Telegraph about how Germany's green push was damaging their industrial base because their fuel bills were so high. I was gonna link it in but I can't find it now :/ I like the ideas on renewables but they aren't a perfect solution,

This?

 

 

 

Also the Brits really screwed up over the last  years. To go from being a world leader in nuclear (and other industries) only to see their large leads completely evaporate to the point that they need French and Chinese help to build new reactors is indicative of how Britain has been blessed with far too many incompetent governments. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This?

 

 

 

Also the Brits really screwed up over the last  years. To go from being a world leader in nuclear (and other industries) only to see their large leads completely evaporate to the point that they need French and Chinese help to build new reactors is indicative of how Britain has been blessed with far too many incompetent governments. 

 

Huh? None of the UK energy companies wanted to construct a new nuclear reactor, hence EDF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.