+Audioboxer Subscriber² Posted November 3, 2013 Subscriber² Share Posted November 3, 2013 X1 is doing 1080p60 though. See Forza. The 50% thing is nonsense. The 50% relates to the graphics card difference, not overall system XBOX ONE GPU: 1.18 TF GPU (12 CUs) for games 768 Shaders 48 Texture units 16 ROPS 2 ACE/ 16 queues PLAYSTATION 4 GPU: 1.84TF GPU (18 CUs) for games + 56% 1152 Shaders +50% 72 Texture units +50% 32 ROPS + 100% 8 ACE/64 queues +300% Before anyone moans, go check how graphics cards are compared for the PC in the hardware hangout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soniqstylz Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 I doubt it. if PS4 can't do 1080p60 easily now then XB1 will never be able to. It won't be able to gain 50% performance. Killzone: Shadowfall says hi. As does CoD: Ghosts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soniqstylz Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 The 50% relates to the graphics card difference, not overall system Before anyone moans, go check how graphics cards are compared for the PC in the hardware hangout. Is that before or after the overclock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper11 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Are we back to arguing console vs console specs? You guys needs to come up with a new trick, these cycles of arguments are getting old. They always get old. So we went from arguing about how badly the ps4 destroys the x1, to how much the pc destroys consoles, back to the ps4 destroying the x1. Offense, defense, etc, etc. 1st of all, this is a thread about Drive Club 2nd of all, these arguments are the same old crap, the only thing that changes is the name of the devices and the people on either side. So yeah, maybe its time to move on from these points in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psionicinversion Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Killzone: Shadowfall says hi. As does CoD: Ghosts. Call of Duty has never bin a game that pushes the boundaries of gfx tbh i ran Black Ops2 really easily on a 1GB 6870 at max settings 1080 whereas BF3 struggled in some areas sometimes even crippling the fps to 4 fps so if CoD doesnt play on the PS4 at 1080p then it sucks hard, although ill have to see how it performs on my PC first to see if theyve bothered to do much with the game engine to make it better. Obviously itll be better graphically than black ops 2 but depends by how much. With Killzone i bet itll be using alot of dynamic resolution scaling to achieve 60 fps at 1080p. so like the area your in fighting will be crisp but back ground scenery will prolly to get lowered in resolution to push the frames up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Showan Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Are we back to arguing console vs console specs? You guys needs to come up with a new trick, these cycles of arguments are getting old. They always get old. So we went from arguing about how badly the ps4 destroys the x1, to how much the pc destroys consoles, back to the ps4 destroying the x1. Offense, defense, etc, etc. 1st of all, this is a thread about Drive Club 2nd of all, these arguments are the same old crap, the only thing that changes is the name of the devices and the people on either side. So yeah, maybe its time to move on from these points in this thread. We'll overall it's good they got Drive Club, stable at 1080/30. Considering they got some time till release date, maybe they can get to 60fps. Who knows... I'm not into racers that much. But I do hold a place in my heart for Burnout Paradise... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 I'm not sure why you guys are so upset that launch day titles and launch window titles won't be 1080p 60fps. The consoles aren't as powerful as you guys are making out, they are using ~1.8ghz lower power cpu cores. Your desktop cpu cores are probably 3ghz+ and are way more powerful per clock than these. They chose low power cores for cost reasons as well as heat reasons which would require a bit heatsink and a noisy fan. Just give the developers 1yr after launch day to make all new games 1080p 60fps. Devkits are often buggy and unoptimised, these things take time. I'm sure in 18 months that all games released from then on will be 1080p 60fps, the hardware is very nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawkMan Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 I didn't know the PC was only capable of Quake 1 graphics at 1080p and 60 FPS. See, that's the problem: my PC is capable of better graphics despite being older than the new Xbox or PlayStation. If I wanted subpar graphics I'd play the Wii U. There's a reason I'm getting Watch_Dogs for the PC and not my Wii U, etc. Did you ignore or somehow miss the point ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts