Jump to content



Photo

Amazon workers face ‘illness risk’

united kingdom night shift extra xmas staff robots safety inspections permanent jobs

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 62,140 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 25 November 2013 - 10:55

A BBC investigation into a UK-based Amazon warehouse has found conditions that a stress expert said could cause "mental and physical illness".

Prof Michael Marmot was shown secret filming of night shifts involving up to 11 miles of walking - where an undercover worker was expected to collect orders every 33 seconds.

It comes as the company employs 15,000 extra staff to cater for Christmas.

Amazon said the safety of its workers was its "number one priority."

Undercover reporter Adam Littler, 23, got an agency job at Amazon's Swansea warehouse. He took a hidden camera inside for BBC Panorama to record what happened on his shifts.

He was employed as a "picker", collecting orders from 800,000 sq ft of storage.

A handset told him what to collect and put on his trolley. It allotted him a set number of seconds to find each product and counted down. If he made a mistake the scanner beeped.

"We are machines, we are robots, we plug our scanner in, we're holding it, but we might as well be plugging it into ourselves", he said.

Adam Little undercover Amazon warehouse Adam Littler went undercover as a "picker" at Amazon's Swansea warehouse

"We don't think for ourselves, maybe they don't trust us to think for ourselves as human beings, I don't know."

Prof Marmot, one of Britain's leading experts on stress at work, said the working conditions at the warehouse are "all the bad stuff at once".

He said: "The characteristics of this type of job, the evidence shows increased risk of mental illness and physical illness."

Amazon said that official safety inspections had not raised any concerns and that an independent expert appointed by the company advised that the picking job is "similar to jobs in many other industries and does not increase the risk of mental and physical illness".

 

Amazon said it had invested £1bn in the UK and created 5,000 permanent jobs.

 

th?id=H.4542410157327950&pid=15.1&H=116&

more




#2 AR556

AR556

    Neowinian Senior

  • 5,611 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03

Posted 25 November 2013 - 11:36

If true, this is wrong. I get so sick of hearing about "industry" standards/averages where it should only take x amount of time to do something and anything more, is costing the company x number of $. While yes, it may in fact be true, you're taking a fallible creature and expecting them to perform near flawlessly.



#3 OP Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 62,140 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 25 November 2013 - 12:04

No doubt robots will begin replacing Amazon workers within 10 years. ;)



#4 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 25 November 2013 - 23:08

 

Amazon said the safety of its workers was its "number one priority."

 

What they say and what they do seem two different things, like most companies.



#5 xendrome

xendrome

    In God We Trust; All Others We Monitor

  • 7,273 posts
  • Joined: 05-December 01
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Pro x64

Posted 25 November 2013 - 23:15

No doubt robots will begin replacing Amazon workers within 10 years. ;)

 

That's pretty doubtful.



#6 +Nik L

Nik L

    Where's my pants?

  • 34,007 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 03

Posted 25 November 2013 - 23:15

Come on, in fairness, if anyone believes that the humans are employed there for anything beyond these 2 reasons, they are deluded...

1) Amazon get's govt grants by promising jobs
2) We're cheaper and easier to replace than a sophisticated picking automated plant

That's pretty doubtful.


I am pretty sure that if the cost were right, they would certainly consider the idea, except for the fact that employing local people looks good. Replacing them with mechanical means looks bad.

#7 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 25 November 2013 - 23:26

That's pretty doubtful.

 

I don't doubt it a bit. Replacing workers will save them a lot of money.