Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Northrop Balks at Agency’s Request To Interview JWST Workers||
|exchange public facing server question||
|HELP! Internal D drive wiped after upgrading to Win 10!||
|Why have they split Control Panel and Settings?||
Posted 01 December 2013 - 16:31
Posted 01 December 2013 - 16:32
If you want to run MS SQL, you could do that with MS SQL Express I believe, and that will run on XP and up I believe, but there are limitations, the full blown MS SQL and Windows Server is going to cost you +$1000 just in software.
I only need MS SQL Express.
Posted 01 December 2013 - 16:37
And what flavor of MS SQL do you want to run? It sure is not Cheap unless your talking express version which is free, free will run on pretty much any windows OS. If your talking "standard" or developer versions those also run on just windows - does not have to be server version.
MS SQL Server. So I can install Windows 7 Pro on the server and use it as a regular pc environment?
Posted 01 December 2013 - 17:17
So from the discussion I now understand that the microserver would be more flexible than a synology, in terms of which OS I choose to install, how I want it to function, whether running sql express, backup or a media server. I would also need an extra pci card if I want to access it remotely.
I think the complexity of the server + its advantages outweighs the simplicity of synology...
Posted 02 December 2013 - 22:26
Hi again, what could be a good pair of 8gb ram for the HP microserver? Or should I wait and see how things will perform with 2gb?
Posted 02 December 2013 - 22:29
Posted 06 December 2013 - 00:41
Posted 09 December 2013 - 15:25
I have access to Windows Server 2012 R2 and 2008 R2, but which one to install?
My main goal is data storage and play with MS SQL Server (i have access to SQL Server 2014 and 2012, as well).