Jump to content



Photo

Car tax disc to be axed after 93 years

uk car tax tax disc dvla digital tax disc

  • Please log in to reply
70 replies to this topic

#31 testman

testman

    Neowinian

  • 1,087 posts
  • Joined: 06-April 05

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:29

It's the fact they you have to pay more if you pay in installments, it may be less then previous but it's still 5% - 10% more than the full payment!
 
£100 if you can afford it
£105 if you can't - not great if you're counting the pennies!

Yes obviously but it's LESS THAN NOW!


#32 Tomo

Tomo

    IT Engineer

  • 785 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 01
  • Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:32

Yes obviously but it's LESS THAN NOW!

Yes I agree with you 100%, it is less than it is currently. The point I'm making is that it should be £100 in full or £100 in installments, if the Government really want to help those on the bread line then don't take that extra £5 out of their pockets!



#33 +Aheer.R.S.

Aheer.R.S.

    I cannot Teach Him, the Boy has no Patience!

  • 11,527 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 10

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:36

They recategorised the insurance groups years ago.

about 2 years ago is when I was almost priced off the road, last renewal they succeeded. It cost me my job, so they increased my insurance more as 'I am now more likely to drive my car during the day' (clean license and 9 years no claims)

#34 Skiver

Skiver

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,176 posts
  • Joined: 10-October 05
  • Location: UK, Reading

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:38

The Govt are supposed to looking after the interest of the public, help those in need not charging them more to spread the cost.

I think we are in agreement, just maybe a slight miss understanding about what we are talking about when we say less. However I would have to say that whilst it may not be the step you wanted, in the end they are coming up with ways of making it more afordable 5% drop in the price of anything is still a drop, as well as being able to spread the costs monthly rather than every 6 to 12 months. 

 

like I say, I'm not saying I agree with the statement of paying more so you can make things more affordable, but whatever way you spin this, in the end it is less than and available in an even more manageable way than it was before.

 

 

It's a matter of perspective, if you were living at or just below, or just above the poverty line, you'd feel differently, and unfortunately, they're always the ones to feel the pinch first. So many of the youthes feel they lave little or nothing to lose, so crime can escalate, along with resentment and so on, but I'm getting off topic.

 

Very true, don't think because of the company car that the cost of these things are no worries to me, I've gone from a 2 car to a 1 car family because of the costs of certain things and the cost of £190 of Car tax for a 1.6 petrol Peugot 307 is one of those things. I'm also not asking for sympathy with that statement, I am still privilaged enough to not count myself as unfortunately for the people you were referring to.



#35 testman

testman

    Neowinian

  • 1,087 posts
  • Joined: 06-April 05

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:40

about 2 years ago is when I was almost priced off the road, last renewal they succeeded. It cost me my job, so they increased my insurance more as 'I am now more likely to drive my car during the day' (clean license and 9 years no claims)

That's the insurance companies for you. Apparently it's more riskier to insure you if you don't have a job. A bit of a weird explanation.

What would be better is if the insurance companies were forced to make this data available to the public out in the open, then we can see for ourselves if jobless people were really a riskier group. If they were, then fair enough, as the data is there so no one can dispute it, but it's just annoying that right now we can't verify why it is, or why people have to pay more when in certain places of the country.

#36 what

what

    Neowinian Senior

  • 7,472 posts
  • Joined: 04-December 06
  • Location: Kent, England

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:40

Using a computer = good

 

Offering monthly direct debits = price hikes in VED will look less severe and so can be raised more each year.

 

It's easier to say "VED is going up £2 per month" than "£24 per year".

 

I'm surprised they aren't just offloading it onto the price of petrol so it's based on usage rather than a flat rate depending on emissions/engine size. 



#37 +Aheer.R.S.

Aheer.R.S.

    I cannot Teach Him, the Boy has no Patience!

  • 11,527 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 10

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:44

I think we are in agreement, just maybe a slight miss understanding about what we are talking about when we say less. However I would have to say that whilst it may not be the step you wanted, in the end they are coming up with ways of making it more afordable 5% drop in the price of anything is still a drop, as well as being able to spread the costs monthly rather than every 6 to 12 months.

like I say, I'm not saying I agree with the statement of paying more so you can make things more affordable, but whatever way you spin this, in the end it is less than and available in an even more manageable way than it was before.




Very true, don't think because of the company car that the cost of these things are no worries to me, I've gone from a 2 car to a 1 car family because of the costs of certain things and the cost of £190 of Car tax for a 1.6 petrol Peugot 307 is one of those things. I'm also not asking for sympathy with that statement, I am still privilaged enough to not count myself as unfortunately for the people you were referring to.

I feel that someone needs to speak for them, I also can agree that I'm probably not the right person for this job, but as someone who's experienced this extreme, I just felt something needed to be said.

#38 +Aheer.R.S.

Aheer.R.S.

    I cannot Teach Him, the Boy has no Patience!

  • 11,527 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 10

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:47

That's the insurance companies for you. Apparently it's more riskier to insure you if you don't have a job. A bit of a weird explanation.

What would be better is if the insurance companies were forced to make this data available to the public out in the open, then we can see for ourselves if jobless people were really a riskier group. If they were, then fair enough, as the data is there so no one can dispute it, but it's just annoying that right now we can't verify why it is, or why people have to pay more when in certain places of the country.

Thank you, I was beginning to think you were the type of person who would say, it's the fault of the poor for being poor.
I'm glad to have been mistaken, a reasonable and diplomatic person can make a subject debate enjoyable (for lack of a better word)

#39 testman

testman

    Neowinian

  • 1,087 posts
  • Joined: 06-April 05

Posted 05 December 2013 - 16:47

Using a computer = good
 
Offering monthly direct debits = price hikes in VED will look less severe and so can be raised more each year.
 
It's easier to say "VED is going up £2 per month" than "£24 per year".
 
I'm surprised they aren't just offloading it onto the price of petrol so it's based on usage rather than a flat rate depending on emissions/engine size.

Possibly, but 1. at the end of the day it's just speculation as to the next move and the motive and 2. you can still pay in 6-months or 12-months periods if you want.

Offloading it onto petrol - petrol is already mostly tax-based anyway. At the prices it is now, no one wants it to go up by any amount.

At the moment, VED is priced in such a way to encourage people to use less-polluting vehicles. Putting it on petrol would lose that benefit.

What they've been talking about for a while is getting rid of VED entirely and making you pay for the roads that you use. But that wouldn't address the "encouraging people to use less-polluting cars" issue that they are currently using the VED pricing to do.

#40 BillyJack

BillyJack

    Neowinian

  • 752 posts
  • Joined: 20-December 05
  • Location: Florida, United States

Posted 05 December 2013 - 17:13

They'll tax is for every breathe we take soon!

 

Makes me think about bottled water and when will they start selling bottle air. lol



#41 Haggis

Haggis

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,411 posts
  • Joined: 13-June 07
  • Location: Near Stirling, Scotland
  • OS: Debian 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE (i9305)

Posted 05 December 2013 - 17:15

The reason there is a charge on paying monthly or paying every 6 months is there is more admin work to be done as your paying multiple times a year instead of just once a year



#42 OP Crisp

Crisp

    To infinity and beyond

  • 5,417 posts
  • Joined: 06-May 10
  • Location: 127.0.0.1

Posted 05 December 2013 - 18:24

The reason there is a charge on paying monthly or paying every 6 months is there is more admin work to be done as your paying multiple times a year instead of just once a year

 

We wouldn't want to over work them new servers with the new system!



#43 Tomo

Tomo

    IT Engineer

  • 785 posts
  • Joined: 17-August 01
  • Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Posted 06 December 2013 - 16:02

The reason there is a charge on paying monthly or paying every 6 months is there is more admin work to be done as your paying multiple times a year instead of just once a year

Actually there isn't, Direct Debit does all the legwork, that's why the energy companies offer better deals if you use it.



#44 McKay

McKay

    Neowinian Stallion

  • 5,907 posts
  • Joined: 29-August 10
  • Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Lane
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: LG G3

Posted 06 December 2013 - 16:09

Aheer.R.S., on 05 Dec 2013 - 16:01, said:

You're probably right, and I could do with going back and re readin the article.

Just annoyed as my uk insurance group 15 car is now group 22, and insurance has gone up to an extortionate amount, this just felt like adding insult to injury..


Ive had my first car for almost a year now, it really stung me. £3000 for a Volkswagen Polo, £1200 to insure it, then £105 to tax it.



#45 Haggis

Haggis

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,411 posts
  • Joined: 13-June 07
  • Location: Near Stirling, Scotland
  • OS: Debian 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE (i9305)

Posted 06 December 2013 - 16:12

Actually there isn't, Direct Debit does all the legwork, that's why the energy companies offer better deals if you use it.

Really you sure?

 

twice as many tax discs

twice as many envelopes

twice as much postage

twice the processing

 

 

Computer system to deal with twice as many queries rather then 1 person every 12 months





Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!