Jump to content



Photo

US Drone Strike in Yemen Kills 17 at Wedding Party

us drone strike yemen wedding al qaeda

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 Gerowen

Gerowen

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,479 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 05
  • Location: Hills of Kentucky
  • OS: Ubuntu Linux

Posted 21 December 2013 - 03:39

SANA, Yemen -- Anger over the American drone campaign against militants in Yemen swelled Friday with word that most of those killed in a strike a day earlier were civilians in a wedding party.
The death toll reached 17 overnight, hospital officials in central Bayda province said Friday. Five of those killed were suspected of involvement with Al Qaeda, but the remainder were unconnected with the militancy, Yemeni security officials said.


More and source


#2 Rohdekill

Rohdekill

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,598 posts
  • Joined: 06-July 05
  • Location: Earth

Posted 21 December 2013 - 03:47

Well, then maybe people should get smart and not associate or be around the five terrorists in the first place.  They all can't be innocent.  Nobody just invites five terroists that they've never met to a wedding.



#3 +timster

timster

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,788 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 08
  • Location: Canada
  • OS: 7.1.2 JB
  • Phone: iPhone 4

Posted 21 December 2013 - 03:49

All I see here is colateral damage.

 

I doubt this would be news if it happened somewhere that wasn't a wedding.



#4 Torolol

Torolol

  • 3,027 posts
  • Joined: 24-November 12

Posted 21 December 2013 - 03:56

there must some chemistry going on between wedding and drones, as this stuff keep happening over and over ...



#5 LaP

LaP

    Forget about it

  • 6,085 posts
  • Joined: 10-July 06
  • Location: Quebec City, Canada
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Pro Update 1

Posted 21 December 2013 - 03:57

All I see here is colateral damage.
 
I doubt this would be news if it happened somewhere that wasn't a wedding.


This would definately be news if this sort of "colateral damage" would happen in USA. In fact this would be the only news for like 2 weeks.

Calling this "colateral damage", providing it's true of course, is really heartless and low.

#6 McKay

McKay

    Neowinian Stallion

  • 6,011 posts
  • Joined: 29-August 10
  • Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Lane
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: LG G3

Posted 21 December 2013 - 04:05

Well, then maybe people should get smart and not associate or be around the five terrorists in the first place.  They all can't be innocent.  Nobody just invites five terroists that they've never met to a wedding.

 

Do you know what all of your friends get up to at all times? When you attend a Wedding do you know every single person and their guests? Even my best friend I see 8 hours a day, 5 days a week at work could have a double life as a terrorist for all I know. Even at my own parents wedding, I only knew half the "family" that turned up, had no clue who their +1's were. 



#7 MindTrickz

MindTrickz

    That's no way to treat a lady!

  • 1,287 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 03
  • Location: Europe:

Posted 21 December 2013 - 04:18

Well, then maybe people should get smart and not associate or be around the five terrorists in the first place.  They all can't be innocent.  Nobody just invites five terroists that they've never met to a wedding.

 

So America murders half a dozen innocent people and that is what you have to say? Never-mind that those 5 SUSPECTS are just that suspects and that no evidence has been brought forth proving their guilt.



#8 FlintyV

FlintyV

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,377 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 21 December 2013 - 04:25

Well, then maybe people should get smart and not associate or be around the five terrorists in the first place.  They all can't be innocent.  Nobody just invites five terroists that they've never met to a wedding.

 

Reap what you sow as the idiom goes and the US will likely be in for a lot of trouble in the future. It's only turning more people to seek revenge and pushing more people to terrorist groups. 



#9 macrosslover

macrosslover

    Muad’Dib

  • 3,115 posts
  • Joined: 13-August 02
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • OS: Windows 7

Posted 21 December 2013 - 04:50

So America murders half a dozen innocent people and that is what you have to say? Never-mind that those 5 SUSPECTS are just that suspects and that no evidence has been brought forth proving their guilt.

I'm sure there's evidence but I doubt any of us mere mortals will ever see it.  I find it uncanny that these five "suspects" were all at the same event, birds of a feather...just saying.  I support the right of our security service i.e. paramilitary unit CIA to unilaterally strike at potential targets as their burden of proof should be much lower than ours.  They can't afford to allow an attack to happen or you might end up having something like Benghazi happen again.  They should be able to act more quickly than normal legal processes.  HOWEVER  that doesn't mean I support the killing of innocent people to accomplish that goal and while I'm sure they would have preferred all of them to be traveling in one vehicle I can't begin to understand what made them strike the wedding as opposed to waiting.



#10 OP Gerowen

Gerowen

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,479 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 05
  • Location: Hills of Kentucky
  • OS: Ubuntu Linux

Posted 21 December 2013 - 04:57

Reap what you sow as the idiom goes and the US will likely be in for a lot of trouble in the future. It's only turning more people to seek revenge and pushing more people to terrorist groups. 

Agreed.

 

Dick Cheney said, "Our friends (In the Middle East) no longer trust us and our enemies no longer fear us."

He said this in light of the Snowden leaks when interviewed and asked about this administration's handling of Middle East politics.

 

England already has radical Muslims harassing people in the streets for violating Sharia law, and they even cut the head off a soldier walking down the streets of London.  I think the U.S. will eventually, if it doesn't already, have its fair share of "active" radical Muslim groups.



#11 MindTrickz

MindTrickz

    That's no way to treat a lady!

  • 1,287 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 03
  • Location: Europe:

Posted 21 December 2013 - 05:08

I'm sure there's evidence but I doubt any of us mere mortals will ever see it.  I find it uncanny that these five "suspects" were all at the same event, birds of a feather...just saying.  I support the right of our security service i.e. paramilitary unit CIA to unilaterally strike at potential targets as their burden of proof should be much lower than ours.  They can't afford to allow an attack to happen or you might end up having something like Benghazi happen again.  They should be able to act more quickly than normal legal processes.  HOWEVER  that doesn't mean I support the killing of innocent people to accomplish that goal and while I'm sure they would have preferred all of them to be traveling in one vehicle I can't begin to understand what made them strike the wedding as opposed to waiting.

 

It's almost as if American lives are more important than Yemani lives. The number of innocent people killed by drones is reaching the thousands, yet America launched two full scale wars because of a few thousand dead American.



#12 MindTrickz

MindTrickz

    That's no way to treat a lady!

  • 1,287 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 03
  • Location: Europe:

Posted 21 December 2013 - 05:17

Agreed.

 

Dick Cheney said, "Our friends (In the Middle East) no longer trust us and our enemies no longer fear us."

He said this in light of the Snowden leaks when interviewed and asked about this administration's handling of Middle East politics.

 

England already has radical Muslims harassing people in the streets for violating Sharia law, and they even cut the head off a soldier walking down the streets of London.  I think the U.S. will eventually, if it doesn't already, have its fair share of "active" radical Muslim groups.

 

I love how you are grouping non-related issues and trying to pass them off as one. Very smooth

 

Anyway, Dick Cheney is a war-monger. What he is referring to in that comment is the latest US and Iran nuclear deal,  and when he says  our friends in the middle east he is refereeing to Israel. He and the Israeli right-wing government want a war with Iran.



#13 OP Gerowen

Gerowen

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,479 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 05
  • Location: Hills of Kentucky
  • OS: Ubuntu Linux

Posted 21 December 2013 - 05:22

I love how you are grouping non-related issues and trying to pass them off as one. Very smooth

 

Anyway, Dick Cheney is a war-monger. What he is referring to in that comment is the latest US and Iran nuclear deal,  and when he says  our friends in the middle east he is refereeing to Israel. He and the Israeli right-wing government want a war with Iran.

I'm not trying to bring other issues in, I just think his statement holds a lot of truth beyond the context in which it was made.



#14 Brian Miller

Brian Miller

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,028 posts
  • Joined: 15-December 10

Posted 21 December 2013 - 05:27

Wait, didn't we kill Ben Ladin?  Why are we still fighting invisible enemys?  Are we trying to create enemys for the future?



#15 McKay

McKay

    Neowinian Stallion

  • 6,011 posts
  • Joined: 29-August 10
  • Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Lane
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: LG G3

Posted 21 December 2013 - 05:32

Wait, didn't we kill Ben Ladin?  Why are we still fighting invisible enemys?  Are we trying to create enemys for the future?

 

Bin Laden may be dead but the Taliban aren't, I'm not sure about the US Objective but the UK's objective in Afghanistan was to set up a stable Government to govern the area, so it doesn't become a breeding ground/safe haven for terrorism. Now we've set up the Afghan Government, the Afghan National Army and build an Officer Training Academy, the British are preparing to pull out in the coming years with the promise of financing their Government.