Jump to content



Photo

Candy Crush Saga developer trademarks "candy"


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#16 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 21,453 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 22 January 2014 - 06:41

Heh, I just thought the exact same thing. When I think of a "Candy" game I immediately think of Candy Land. Although, when I think of Candy Crush I think of Facebook (and the people I've deleted on it for inviting me to play Candy Crush, to be fair I give them two stern warnings).

 

People who delete or complain that their friends send game invites are amusing. FB has a function to simply block all game invites you know so you don't have to ever see them. except for the rare few games who breaks the FB TOS by sending game invites/requests as direct requests to friends. But you can block these to easily. 




#17 exotoxic

exotoxic

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,153 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 04
  • Location: England

Posted 22 January 2014 - 17:40

I read today they are going after "banner saga" because it contains the word "saga" :laugh:



#18 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 21,453 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 22 January 2014 - 17:42

I read today they are going after "banner saga" because it contains the word "saga" :laugh:

 

Apparently they're going after ANY game with the word Saga... 



#19 Xilo

Xilo

    Neowinian Senior

  • 5,322 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 04
  • Location: Austin, TX

Posted 22 January 2014 - 17:44

I've never played CCS myself but a friend has explained it to me previously. Am I right in thinking you have to match 3 in so many moves, and it needs to be done in a particular order or you lose?

CCS is designed to where generally the only way you will beat levels legitimately is if you get extremely lucky with pieces and board layout. Most of the time you will get to where you will need a couple moves, swap or break some candy to beat it. Therefore you're more inclined to say screw it and pay the $1 for some boosts to beat it when you're that close.



#20 OP MightyJordan

MightyJordan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 16,257 posts
  • Joined: 15-January 06
  • Location: Plymouth, England
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Pro x64
  • Phone: Google Nexus 5 32GB

Posted 22 January 2014 - 17:50

I read today they are going after "banner saga" because it contains the word "saga" :laugh:

Indeed.

 

The rumours surrounding King contesting the title The Banner Saga - over its use of the word "saga" - have been confirmed.
 
A firm "Notice of Opposition" has been filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of King suggesting that "The Banner Saga mark is confusingly and deceptively similar to Opposer's previously used Saga Marks."
 
It further adds "The use and registration by Applicant of the mark The Banner Saga for Applicant's goods is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake or deception in the trade, and among purchasers and potential purchasers, with Opposer's Saga Marks, again resulting in damage to Opposer."
 
Uh huh. The document fails to consider that one of these games is a turn-based strategy affair featuring Norse vikings while the other is a casual puzzler about using colourful sweets to battle less colourful sweets (i.e. chocolate). We're still awaiting comment from King on this one, while The Banner Saga developer Stoic Studios is keeping mum at the moment.

 

 

King sent a statement out to Eurogamer which can be read at the top of that article.

 

 

Guess this whole saga (no pun intended) reaffirms my belief that's projected ever so eloquently through this video...
 

 



#21 astropheed

astropheed

    astropheed

  • 1,701 posts
  • Joined: 08-December 11
  • Location: Sydney, AU

Posted 22 January 2014 - 20:38

People who delete or complain that their friends send game invites are amusing. FB has a function to simply block all game invites you know so you don't have to ever see them. except for the rare few games who breaks the FB TOS by sending game invites/requests as direct requests to friends. But you can block these to easily. 

 

Invite me to play Candy Crush once, shame on me. Invite me to play Candy crush twice, shame on you. Invite me to play three times, delete you from existence.



#22 Praetor

Praetor

    ASCii / ANSi Designer

  • 2,706 posts
  • Joined: 05-June 02
  • Location: Lisbon
  • OS: Windows Eight dot One dot One 1!one

Posted 22 January 2014 - 21:00

it's the office that issued that patent that's at fault here, how can a company patent a word like that?



#23 Andrew

Andrew

    Once More 'Round the Sun

  • 24,889 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 25 January 2014 - 10:07

 
King: We do not clone other people's games

By Brendan Sinclair

 

Fri 24 Jan 2014 7:49pm GMT / 2:49pm EST / 11:49am PST
 

Candy Crush company denies accusations but removes game in question "for the avoidance of doubt"

 

King has removed the game Pac-Avoid from its website after a developer accused the Candy Crush Saga company of basing it off his own game, Scamperghost.

 

"King does not clone other peoples' games," the publisher said in a statement. "King believes that IP - both our own IP and that of others - is important and should be properly protected. Like any prudent company, we take all appropriate steps to protect our IP in a sensible and fair way. At the same time, we are respectful of the rights and IP of other developers. Before we launch any game, we do a thorough search of other games in the marketplace, as well as a review of trademark filings, to ensure that we are not infringing anyone else's IP. However, for the avoidance of doubt, in this case, this game - which was coded by a third-party developer 5 years ago - has been taken down."

 

The cloning accusation was just the latest in a series of IP controversies for King this week. First came news of the company's recently filed EU trademark on the word "candy," a trademark it was enforcing against the developer of Candy Casino Slots - Jewels Craze Connect: Big Blast Mania Land. The publisher said it would not be enforcing its trademark against all uses of the word, just those it felt were infringing on its rights or in danger of confusing players.

 

Shortly after that news broke, King challenged a trademark filing by developer Stoic for the name of its debut game, The Banner Saga. In its challenge filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office, King alleged that The Banner Saga was "confusingly and deceptively similar" to King's own use of Saga in its games. Following some outcry over that decision, King released a statement saying it was not trying to stop Stoic from using the Banner Saga name, but had to file a challenge or else it would have been easier for other companies to make illegitimate use of the word.

 

"This is an important issue for King because we already have a series of games where 'Saga' is key to the brand which our players associate with a King game; Candy Crush Saga, Bubble Witch Saga, Pet Rescue Saga, Farm Heroes Saga and so on," a representative said. "All of these titles have already faced substantive trademark and copyright issues with clones."

 

http://www.gamesindu...r-peoples-games

 

 
So What is King's Contribution to the Games Industry, Anyway?

With King in the news over its ongoing trademark disputes, we take a look at its five most popular games so you don't have to.

 

By Pete Davison.

 

King's been in the news a lot recently, largely due to its attempts to claim ownership over the "Candy" trademark and, subsequently, accusations of cloning

 

Prior to this, if you're not big into the world of free-to-play social and mobile games, you may have only had a passing familiarity with King through mentions of Candy Crush Saga -- or, indeed, the advertising for said game that's been plastered everywhere. And yet King is one of the biggest names in free-to-play social gaming right now -- Candy Crush Saga alone attracts over 150 million players every month as the top-ranked game on Facebook, and its other titles also ride high in the charts. 

 

So who are King, why should we care about them, and exactly what have they given to the games industry as a whole? Well, before we get on to their top five games, it's important to at least acknowledge one thing: like their precursor Zynga, King has done a lot to make the concept of video games an accessible and desirable pastime for a much broader spectrum of people, including those who would never consider purchasing a piece of dedicated gaming hardware. King's games aren't "by gamers, for gamers" as the old cliché goes; they're by business people, for everyone -- and the sheer number of people playing each of their games seems to suggest that they're doing something "right," at least from a business perspective. 

 

More importantly from our perspective, though, are their games actually any good? I played their five most popular titles (as ranked by metrics service AppData) so you don't have to. And... well, read on.

 

http://www.usgamer.n...industry-anyway

 



#24 Andrew

Andrew

    Once More 'Round the Sun

  • 24,889 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 27 January 2014 - 19:53

King.com CEO responds

 

http://about.king.co...-approach-to-ip



#25 domboy

domboy

    Neowinian

  • 272 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 13

Posted 27 January 2014 - 20:41

 

Indeed.

 

 

King sent a statement out to Eurogamer which can be read at the top of that article.

 

 

Guess this whole saga (no pun intended) reaffirms my belief that's projected ever so eloquently through this video...
 

 

That is hilarious!!!