Jump to content



Photo

indexing network drive?


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 capr

capr

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 01-July 05

Posted 27 January 2014 - 19:17

Hey, I want windows 7 search to index my network drives so I can search them quicker (they are large with tons of c**p that changes everyday). I looked under windows search/indexing options and they don't let me pick a network drive as a destination. 

 

I saw that making the drive available offline might help but I really don't' want to do that for various reasons. 

 

Ideas? Is there a 3rd party program that will help index the drives (google desktop was it?)?  




#2 TPreston

TPreston

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 18-July 12
  • Location: Ireland
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Enterprise & Server 2012R2/08R2 Datacenter
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 1520

Posted 27 January 2014 - 20:01

It was removed in windows 7 for some reason, Your files have to be on a windows box to get indexing now.

#3 +BudMan

BudMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 106
  • Joined: 04-July 02
  • Location: Schaumburg, IL
  • OS: Win7, Vista, 2k3, 2k8, XP, Linux, FreeBSD, OSX, etc. etc.

Posted 27 January 2014 - 20:25

I use locate32 to create a index of my network shares.

http://sourceforge.n...jects/locate32/

Yes there is a 64bit version. I just have it update the database once a day in the morning, etc.

#4 norir82

norir82

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 29-January 14

Posted 29 January 2014 - 05:19

If you create a new library and add the network drive's folders to it then it'll index it automatically.  In 8.1 you'll have to go to view in Windows Explorer to make Libraries available to view. 



#5 OP capr

capr

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 01-July 05

Posted 06 February 2014 - 19:42

If you create a new library and add the network drive's folders to it then it'll index it automatically.  In 8.1 you'll have to go to view in Windows Explorer to make Libraries available to view. 

that didn't work. Windows only allows indexed folders to be added as libraries. 

 

 

I use locate32 to create a index of my network shares.

http://sourceforge.n...jects/locate32/

Yes there is a 64bit version. I just have it update the database once a day in the morning, etc.

creating the .db right now. I am googling a way to point windows search at this so it can be integrated. 

 

OMG i love locate32. small db size and super quick 


Edited by capr, 06 February 2014 - 20:10.


#6 +BudMan

BudMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 106
  • Joined: 04-July 02
  • Location: Schaumburg, IL
  • OS: Win7, Vista, 2k3, 2k8, XP, Linux, FreeBSD, OSX, etc. etc.

Posted 06 February 2014 - 20:49

Yup its SUPER quick -- would I steer you wrong ;)



#7 riahc3

riahc3

    Neowin's most indecisive member

  • Tech Issues Solved: 11
  • Joined: 09-April 03
  • Location: Spain
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: HTC Desire Z

Posted 10 February 2014 - 10:27

Hello,

would I steer you wrong ;)

:laugh:

#8 +Nik L

Nik L

    Where's my pants?

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 14-January 03

Posted 10 February 2014 - 11:29

My understanding (and am happy to be shot down here) was that you index the files on the SERVER, and then the client, when searching, searches said index?



#9 +BudMan

BudMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 106
  • Joined: 04-July 02
  • Location: Schaumburg, IL
  • OS: Win7, Vista, 2k3, 2k8, XP, Linux, FreeBSD, OSX, etc. etc.

Posted 10 February 2014 - 13:16

Well yeah how else would it work?

 

Locate32 finds files and directories based on file and folder names stored in a database. Locate32 saves to a database the names of all files on your hard drives. Once the file indexing has occurred, you can locate files quickly by using the application's search form. It works like "updatedb" and "locate" commands in Unix. In other words, it uses databases to store information about directory structures and uses these databases in searches. The use of these databases provides very fast searching speed. The software includes a dialog-based application as well as console programs that can be used to update and access the databases. Locate32 is not primarily meant to find text or data within files, but it has a primitive feature to do this.



#10 +Nik L

Nik L

    Where's my pants?

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 14-January 03

Posted 10 February 2014 - 15:59

Well yeah how else would it work?

 

The attitude is not necessary, but it is generally expected.

 

How else would it work?  Well it COULD work by the client having an index.  It'd be a ridiculous idea, but I was making the difference known.



#11 +BudMan

BudMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 106
  • Joined: 04-July 02
  • Location: Schaumburg, IL
  • OS: Win7, Vista, 2k3, 2k8, XP, Linux, FreeBSD, OSX, etc. etc.

Posted 10 February 2014 - 21:22

Attitude? [longer comment snipped upon not wanting to upset the 13 year old girls around here with comments that might offend ;) Dude your mistaken, I was in no way trying to be smartass or lippy or condescending, your reading tone into it if that is your take.  I was simply agreeing with you and asking a question]

 

The db is on the client..  I think your not misunderstanding where the db is maybe?  How you worded it would be the client creates the index(db) and then yeah he searches it.  Then you go to say "Well it COULD work by the client having an index" which is exactly what you said the first time.

 

Where do you think the db is stored?  The client running locate32 is the one creating the db, so it would be stored where ever you configured the software to store it, and it searches mapped drives just like it would a local drive.

 

Now there is a tool search everything http://www.voidtools.com/ that runs on the server and indexes its files - and then you can query that..



#12 +Nik L

Nik L

    Where's my pants?

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 14-January 03

Posted 11 February 2014 - 02:08

Dude your mistaken, I was in no way trying to be smartass or lippy or condescending, your reading tone into it if that is your take.  I was simply agreeing with you and asking a question

 

Then I humbly apologise.