Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|We Texans are brave enough to resist Pentagon||
|Why is the start menu so slow and unreliable?||
|DX11 vs DX12 - does it matter ?||
|Long-awaited deflate-gate investigation implicates Pats, Tom Brady||
|The Jimquisition: Konami is Konami||
Posted 01 February 2014 - 11:51
Posted 01 February 2014 - 12:12
Used to use ImageShack too, didn't know about them going paid only till just now, pity. Been using DropBox as well (got 26.5GB, may as well use it), stupidly easy.. copy the image in via Explorer or whatever file manager, right click the image, "Copy public link", done. No clunky web sites to mess with.
Posted 01 February 2014 - 12:58
Imgur these days, althought I used to use Imageshack. Imgur is just easy to use, no bandwidth limits, etc.
Posted 01 February 2014 - 13:14
Imgur looks fast and easy
Posted 01 February 2014 - 13:18
Imgur is good for most images as long as they're under 5 MB, which shouldn't be a problem unless your images are animated .gifs. In that case, use Tinypic.
Posted 01 February 2014 - 14:23
For images I intend to post somewhere (like Neowin):
...coupled with Imgur uploader (from https://imguruploade...ases/view/40965 - it allows me to right click > Send To > Imgur)
...and Firefox Imgur uploader addon that (usually) allows me to upload to them directly, bypassing local storage and saving clicks
For images I do not intend to post somewhere (and other stuff):
...for which Public and Private are both added to Send To special folder
Posted 02 February 2014 - 13:51
I tend to just host them in a special subdomain on my site tbh. No restrictions, I have full control over when the image is deleted, hotlinking allowed, and no html around the image like at imgur.