Jump to content



Photo
washington dc no blocking nondiscrimination transparency policy telecommunications act common carriers netflix

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 62,632 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 19 February 2014 - 23:08

The FCC chairman, Tom Wheeler, issued a statement today providing details of a path forward for the commission's Open Internet rules for Internet service providers, guidelines that were struck down last month in the Verizon v. FCC decision. Wheeler's statement said that the commission would try to reinstate the goals of:

    No blocking. ISPs can't block Internet traffic for competitive reasons.
    Nondiscrimination. All traffic must get equal treatment.
    Enforcing the transparency policy. ISPs must be disclose how they handle Internet traffic (a federal court had upheld that policy).

In his statement, Wheeler said that the FCC believed that last month's court decision invited the commission to act under section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Section 706 essentially gives the FCC the authority to ensure that advanced telecommunications capability—that is, "high-quality voice, data, graphics, and video telecommunications using any technology"—is deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion.

The FCC also seems to be keeping another option on the table: the ability to classify ISPs as "common carriers" under Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1934. That would open ISPs up to a level of regulatory scrutiny currently reserved for telephone providers and oil and gas pipelines. If the FCC goes that route, it can expect a huge political fight. Michael Powell, a former FCC chairman who's now head of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, has said there would be "World War III" if the FCC tries to classify ISPs as common carriers.

more




#2 +LogicalApex

LogicalApex

    Software Engineer

  • 6,243 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 02
  • Location: Philadelphia, PA
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
  • Phone: Nexus 5

Posted 19 February 2014 - 23:27

World War III... Sounds like he should be imprisoned. Threatening to kill people isn't legal...

 

In reality, Congress needs to act here and enshrine the issues into law. The problem with allowing the FCC to assume this power will be their marriage to industry. I feel a "win" now would lead to a major loss in the future...

 

Not a surprise why this route is being taken with a former telecom exec at the helm. The goal is to give the illusion of victory while securing the reigns by which they operate...