Man Denies He's Bitcoin Founder


Recommended Posts

By RYAN NAKASHIMA Mar 6 7:35PM EST

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The man Newsweek claims is the founder of Bitcoin denies he had anything to do with the digital currency.

In an exclusive two-hour interview with The Associated Press Dorian S. Nakamoto, 64, said he had never heard of Bitcoin until his son told him he had been contacted by a reporter three weeks ago.

Reached at his home in Temple City, Calif., Nakamoto acknowledged that many of the details in Newsweek's report are correct, including that he once worked for a defense contractor. But he strongly disputes the magazine's assertion that he is "the face behind Bitcoin."
Full Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polygraph the dude. Because he didn't deny it the first time through and now that he's had time to react, he decided to try to blurr the lines back to denial.

 

Time to have the ####er submit to a polygraph and have the results posted online.

 

Also we could compare his hand writing to the original notes left by S.  Nakashima. If I recall from a New Yorker investigation, they tried this once before leading them over to Europe for the search for this guy, but they found he had a few uniquenesses in word usage and what have you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who cares, not that big of a deal... its crashing now in a way Mt gox has bin hacked and lost about $500 million of bitcoins, bet ya china is behind that or the US government. if they want it gone they'll make it disappear in one way or another

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polygraph the dude. Because he didn't deny it the first time through and now that he's had time to react, he decided to try to blurr the lines back to denial.

 

Time to have the ####er submit to a polygraph and have the results posted online.

 

Also we could compare his hand writing to the original notes left by S.  Nakashima. If I recall from a New Yorker investigation, they tried this once before leading them over to Europe for the search for this guy, but they found he had a few uniquenesses in word usage and what have you...

 

 

You don't just go and polygraph someone upon a suspicion of something.  FFS what world do you live in!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polygraph the dude. Because he didn't deny it the first time through and now that he's had time to react, he decided to try to blurr the lines back to denial.

 

Time to have the ####er submit to a polygraph and have the results posted online.

 

Also we could compare his hand writing to the original notes left by S.  Nakashima. If I recall from a New Yorker investigation, they tried this once before leading them over to Europe for the search for this guy, but they found he had a few uniquenesses in word usage and what have you...

Why do you care this strongly? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polygraph the dude. Because he didn't deny it the first time through and now that he's had time to react, he decided to try to blurr the lines back to denial.

 

Time to have the ####er submit to a polygraph and have the results posted online.

 

Also we could compare his hand writing to the original notes left by S.  Nakashima. If I recall from a New Yorker investigation, they tried this once before leading them over to Europe for the search for this guy, but they found he had a few uniquenesses in word usage and what have you...

 

what would a poly graph do? they are nothing but rubbish intimidation machines, not truth machines like they are played out to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Like everyone else said, Who Cares?

2. He may have to deny it for legal reasons.

3. Maybe he doesn't want publicity

4.He probably doesn't want interviews either or having the news come after him.

5. He doesn't want death threats/ become sued for situations like Mt Gox. 's collapse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what would a poly graph do? they are nothing but rubbish intimidation machines, not truth machines like they are played out to be

He wants to prove he lied, admitting he was the inventor the first time through.

 

Also, he should be liable for the legality of his product/software. I think its actually illegal to make and market a currency not approved by the government, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wants to prove he lied, admitting he was the inventor the first time through.

 

Also, he should be liable for the legality of his product/software. I think its actually illegal to make and market a currency not approved by the government, for example.

you missed the entirety of my post.

 

nvm after reading your website this posts makes all too much sense coming from yourself, "both officers were communicating with an FBI Agent Roberts over synthetic telepathy, while the technology was being used to abuse me, hurt my body, and simulate psychosis"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wants to prove he lied, admitting he was the inventor the first time through.

 

Also, he should be liable for the legality of his product/software. I think its actually illegal to make and market a currency not approved by the government, for example.

 

Why doesn't the CIA just read this thoughts and find out if he's telling the truth?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why doesn't the CIA just read this thoughts and find out if he's telling the truth?

 

Amazing, I think YOU are the CIA because I was typing the exact same response word for word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.