34 posts in this topic

Posted

 

This is just cross party rivalry in order to get more seats or whatever.

 

You can't just brush it off as cross party rivalry just because the rival was the one to point it out. It could have been a friend of his to bring it to light and the other party not mentioned anything, what would you say then? friendly banter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I believe that there's no such thing as negative PR, especially when it's being done at no expense to you.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Sorry Zhiv, but English people don't generally see toting around a gun as particularly masculine.  We tend to see it as quite threatening, actually, and this will harm his political reputation.

 

I've never heard of this guy, and my initial reaction to reading the story and seeing the pic was "Definitely dodgy, shouldn't be in office".

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Sorry Zhiv, but English people don't generally see toting around a gun as particularly masculine.  We tend to see it as quite threatening, actually, and this will harm his political reputation.

 

I've never heard of this guy, and my initial reaction to reading the story and seeing the pic was "Definitely dodgy, shouldn't be in office".

 

I agree, I did say it could backfire, however, English people share England with many other nationalities and he could be betting on the support provided by the immigrants.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I agree, however, English people share England with many other nationalities and he could be betting on the support provided by the immigrants.

 

Not a chance in hell.  This is far more likely to have been done to sabotage his political career more than anything else, and there's far more chance of that happening than the opposite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Not a chance in hell.  This is far more likely to have been done to sabotage his political career more than anything else, and there's far more chance of that happening than the opposite.

 

Yes, one mistake, one slip is all it takes to get one's carrier in politics buried. He surely didn't think it through when he made that twit; unless it was all intentional.

 

If he's an amateur, he's gone.

 

If this affair had been planned in advance, he must have assessed all his risks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

the photo does make him look terroristy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Best way to get pains in the arse after your skin is to, open up a social media account like facebook and also a secondary media account like twitter.

 

My partner, well the last school she worked at, she lost her job, because a nasty parent went on a with hunt found her facebook account and complained about her mentioning

 

she would like to lynch certain children because of their behaviour.

 

I don't have a facebook account, I want my private life kept private, I do have a twitter account for my cricket club and to get free software.

 

The councilor should know better.

 

1% of the electorate will see it as bad boy tactics, 99% won't and will find it offensive.

 

He should lose his office.

Just to correct what I wrote, was not my partner, it was a L.S.A. at her school that has or had the facebook account. Witch hunt also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

people make such a fuss over nothing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.