Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
slamfire92

Best free photo organizer program

15 posts in this topic

Would someone recommend a free photo organizer application for Windows that is simple to use and will auto import pictures from a digital camera? I know of DigiKam and Picasa. Does Picasa allow local manipulation or does it shove Google down your throat, forcing account creation/sign-in? I attempted to go to DigiKam's site, but it keeps timing out.

 

This is for a client's PC. They aren't tech-savvy and often hose their machine by clicking yes to everything that pops up on the net. They recently Eff'd up their PC by downloading some photo management software that came with a bazillion garbage programs and a rootkit for good measure. ###### me off too, cause I just installed it for them a few weeks ago. I imaged the damn thing this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really liked "Shotwell" program in Elementary OS. I think it has for Windows as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no shotwell for windows.. Picasa does not require google account..  That would most likely be your best bet.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Picasa is easy and simple and doesn't force any Google-stuff on you - it just has the integration if you want it (for exporting to online albums etc).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly think windows live gallery is a much better option than picasa. It doesn't slow down on large collections, it has much better edition options, whereas picasa always makes things brighter. And it connects to all kinds of services, not just googles own services.

 

But just speed and ability to handle larger libraries make it better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is Photo gallery not a simple option ? it's just as simple as picasa.

 

displaying hundreds of photos picasa can't handle nearly as well as Photo Gallery. thousands.... then you're talking to hell with it for picasa.

 

Besides that with all the limitations Picasa has compared to Photo Gallery, while Photo gallery is faster and more efficient and at least as easy. I see no reason why anyone should use Picasa for any reason. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who said it wasn't - I agreed with you

 

"Yeah that would be a simple option as well.. "

 

I just asked what you consider a large collection..  Since I have not seen any slow downs, etc.

 

But now you got me curious on these limitations you think picasa has as well.  Could you give an example?  They sure look comparable to feature set to me from a quick overview, with just in general picasa looking more robust in features than gallery.  As to why someone would use one over the other - right out of the gate one integrates with google, the other with MS.. So right there would be clear cut when one would be used over the other.. If your a google person picasa, if your a hotmail/outlook/ms user then photo gallery would be the logical choice if after online integration vs just local use.

 

Again who said anything about it not being a simple option??  But I think a simple discussion of the differences between them might be beneficial to the OP making a choice.

 

Couple of quick things I see different - is the photo editor seems easier to use than gallery and more features - with easy batch features.  Maybe I am missing it - but I don't see batch features in gallery?  While this might be considered a more advanced feature that the audience of OP.  It seems that might be reason to choose one over the other, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fastone. . .one of the best of the free options.  Been using it for years and have yet to fine fault with it. . . :D

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who said it wasn't - I agreed with you

 

"Yeah that would be a simple option as well.. "

 

I just asked what you consider a large collection..  Since I have not seen any slow downs, etc.

 

But now you got me curious on these limitations you think picasa has as well.  Could you give an example?  They sure look comparable to feature set to me from a quick overview..  As to why someone would use one over the other - right out of the gate one integrates with google, the other with MS.. So right there would be clear cut when one would be used over the other.. If your a google person picasa, if your a hotmail/outlook/ms user then photo gallery would be the logical choice if after online integration vs just local use.

 

Again who said anything about it not being a simple option??  But I think a simple discussion of the differences between them might be beneficial to the OP making a choice.

 

limitations, unless things have changed very recently Picasa is locked to google services. while Photo Gallery by default plugs into Facebook, One Drive, Youtube, Flickr, Vimeo and a few more, and with standard plugins it connects to anything. Lots of nice batch functions, it uses windows own libraries, it supports local printing companies all over the world(though generally one should use their own web services for this anyway), blog post your photos to supported blogs directly.

 

 

Then there's the limited editing functionality where Picasa has had this weird thing where when you edit a picture it can only increase brightness, not reduce it. which was weird when adding contrast and such. hopefully they've fixed that in one of the latest version, but they've never bothered to before so I doubt it.  Then youhave the lsightly more advanced features that uses Microsofts research teams baked in functions, like Panorama,, Photo Fuse, and Auto collage. You can download new tools into the program from the research team too, like ICE(which is what powers the other ones as well) and even a Picasa web publisher. 

 

It's just a more powerful tool while retaining simplicity and ease of use. automatic face recognition/tagging is neat to.

 

As for speed, it's not that Picasa can't to it, it just loads pictures/thumbs more slowly when scrolling through a newly opened large collection. which at least for me is annoying. granted I don't use either of them for much anymore since I use the adobe photography subscription for Lightroom, which can't do all the neat tricks Photo Gallery can, but it's a lot better for DSLR Raw shooters like me :) and I can run Photo Gallery on top of it again for it's features.

Fastone. . .one of the best of the free options.  Been using it for years and have yet to fine fault with it. . . :D

Faststone is more of a viewer than a manager.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will photo gallery auto import from camera? I guess its either gallery or picasa.

 

EDIT: Nevermind, I looked up gallery. It seems to do what is required. I've never seen someone infect their PC so much that doesn't browse porn.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Valid point about the integration of other services..  But collage is part of picasa and quick look blows photo galleries collage options away with choices of what to do, how many photos to include, etc etc...   As to calling it more powerful - that really depends on what your looking to accomplish.  If the feature set it not there that is needed, then its not more powerful ;)  If I wanted to do collages with the pictures -- sorry it would be hands down picasa as winner for example.  Now if wanted to do fusing or panoramic - then yeah gallery hands down better choice to be sure.

 

They are both free - and can use the same folders..  Install them both and use the one that best suites what your doing, etc.  If after a while you find not using the other, then just delete it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your suggestions :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

limitations, unless things have changed very recently Picasa is locked to google services. while Photo Gallery by default plugs into Facebook, One Drive, Youtube, Flickr, Vimeo and a few more, and with standard plugins it connects to anything. Lots of nice batch functions, it uses windows own libraries, it supports local printing companies all over the world(though generally one should use their own web services for this anyway), blog post your photos to supported blogs directly.

 

 

Then there's the limited editing functionality where Picasa has had this weird thing where when you edit a picture it can only increase brightness, not reduce it. which was weird when adding contrast and such. hopefully they've fixed that in one of the latest version, but they've never bothered to before so I doubt it.  Then youhave the lsightly more advanced features that uses Microsofts research teams baked in functions, like Panorama,, Photo Fuse, and Auto collage. You can download new tools into the program from the research team too, like ICE(which is what powers the other ones as well) and even a Picasa web publisher. 

 

It's just a more powerful tool while retaining simplicity and ease of use. automatic face recognition/tagging is neat to.

 

As for speed, it's not that Picasa can't to it, it just loads pictures/thumbs more slowly when scrolling through a newly opened large collection. which at least for me is annoying. granted I don't use either of them for much anymore since I use the adobe photography subscription for Lightroom, which can't do all the neat tricks Photo Gallery can, but it's a lot better for DSLR Raw shooters like me :) and I can run Photo Gallery on top of it again for it's features.

Faststone is more of a viewer than a manager.

Hate to say this, ableit you are wrong.  That is all I have to say at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fastone. . .one of the best of the free options.  Been using it for years and have yet to fine fault with it. . . :D

 

I agree. Faststone is top notch. And free.

It has basic image editing, which might be enough for casual use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.