Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

us Two big SCOTUS decisions today

8 posts in this topic

Posted

1. Aereo was determined to be illegal

2. Police cannot search digital devices (i.e cellphones) without a warrant.  A huge win for digital privacy.

 

Source: http://www.scotusblog.com/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The Aereo decision was pretty much a given although I disagree with the results. If I could access enough channels from OTA I would have done that a long time ago but as it is I live in a hole. My only access to TV is if I do satellite or cable (cable tv is a rip off, almost as much as the internet) so not having OTA access is a downer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So sad about the Aereo case. I mean, I suppose a part of me always knew that was going to happen, but I was really holding on to hope that SCOTUS would do the right thing for consumers and by the law. Aereo was completely legal under Cablevision, but as someone at Ars said, "This verdict, brought to you by Comcast."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That sucks for Aereo, I wonder if they will still exist but in a different manner such as just paying retransmission fees or something. I was hoping it would come out alright for them so that they could open up in my area. Where I live we are too far from the Major city to pick up anything OTA even with the Best Antenna I could find.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That sucks for Aereo, I wonder if they will still exist but in a different manner such as just paying retransmission fees or something. I was hoping it would come out alright for them so that they could open up in my area. Where I live we are too far from the Major city to pick up anything OTA even with the Best Antenna I could find.

The CEO has stated he won't pay retransmission fees. I wonder if they can pivot to do one of two things: (1) license their software to broadcasters or cable operators who may fall under Cablevision ruling from 2008; or (2), create a Slingbox-type of box with one of those antennas in them for people to use in their home (similar to a Simple.tv solution)?

 

But the same CEO has already said they don't have a Plan B, so who knows. Everything I've read says that if they lose, they'll shut down completely. That's a lot of lost jobs, lost money, and lost opportunity though. Too bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The BIG one is not searching digital devices without a warrant. That practice has been terribly abused.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Modern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. With all they contain and all they may reveal, they hold for many Americans
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Anyone thinking the Supreme Court doesn't research before making a decision should read this one. They go from a "man from Mars" thinking cell phones are a human appendage :) to discussing Faraday cages to prevent remote data wiping while waiting for a warrant. Great read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.