You're kidding, right? Wow, you certainly like to think you know what's right for everyone. My opinion and experience may not match yours, but it certainly doesn't mean I am wrong, you ever hear of to each their own? Probably not with your know-it-all attitude.
I'm talking about actual FACTS though. it's a bit different from talking about personal opinions about whether you like that movie or not.
PQ, motion, real contrast, refresh rate. even backlight(seeing as the Plasma has no backlight, and the LED's use a crappy diffusor plate) are all objectively, provably better on a plasma than on a LCD/LED. incidentally, old style CFM backlit LCD's had better and more even back lights than modern LED's a well.
You can say you like the thin bezel of a LED better, you can say you like their superbright eye burning picture and dynamic contrast(well you get dynamic picture ruining contrast on plasma to). But you can't claim the picture is better, and then get upset when someone points out that objectively you're wrong and your making claims a facts when they're wrong.
I have one (Samsung 43"), they come a long way in reducing heat an power consumption.
However, I have a partial burn in of the Cartoon Network Logo on mine... despite pixel shifting being on the entire time ><
Which is not covered by Samsung Warranty.
Samsung, at least here in Europe, is supposed to cover ALL occurrences of burn in a a panel fault.
that being said. This is one of the reasons I don't like Samsung plasma, besides not being near the same PQ quality a Panasonic and LG on their plasma's, they have suffered ar more, far easier and far longer with burn in, even after burn in was a thing of the past on the competition, they still suffer with it.