Jump to content



Photo

UI debate (Translucency or not)

yosemite windows osx

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 +d5aqoëp

d5aqoëp

    Banned

  • 3,081 posts
  • Joined: 07-October 07

Posted 07 August 2014 - 08:59

Windows 7 had a similar effect for windows borders. It was actually cool. But Microsoft dropped it in favour of flatter opaque UI for Windows 8.

I myself loved the translucency and Apple re-introducing this effect in Yosemite brings joy. Case being Microsoft dropped the ball... and Apple picked it up and polished it (frosted glass with matte look).
Much has been said about Yosemite's UI. But I quite like it. I want to know what Neowin thinks about it. If translucency is done right, can it enhance your OS experience in terms of eye candy? Is it more pleasing to our eyes?
 




#2 Studio384

Studio384

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,836 posts
  • Joined: 06-July 12
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Update Pro
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8.1 Update

Posted 07 August 2014 - 09:04

Well, I would prefer Aero Glass over Aqua when it comes to this effect. However, I think personaly that we are past the days that this was a nice effect. And be fair: it is quit a pointless effect. With Glass, you could at least see what the things behind the window actualy was, but this functional use doesn't exist in Aqua. It's only blur and you can't recognize anything from it...



#3 +Jack Unterweger

Jack Unterweger

    devoted fan of the us-armed forces

  • 3,090 posts
  • Joined: 19-January 03
  • OS: Snapshot-Linux x64 1149 0.3
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S3

Posted 07 August 2014 - 09:04

Windows 7 had a similar effect for windows borders. It was actually cool. But Microsoft dropped it in favour of flatter opaque UI for Windows 8.

I myself loved the translucency and Apple re-introducing this effect in Yosemite brings joy. Case being Microsoft dropped the ball... and Apple picked it up and polished it (frosted glass with matte look).
Much has been said about Yosemite's UI. But I quite like it. I want to know what Neowin thinks about it. If translucency is done right, can it enhance your OS experience in terms of eye candy? Is it more pleasing to our eyes?
 

 

i think the best thing any os can do is offer both or even more options with window decorations and themes. with windows i always feel so reduced (xp was the last system where the themes could be changed pretty much) i mean what they call now theme is just a new wallpaper.

and apple, well, if i just had the money ... like them or not they know a bit about good os theming/designing.

 

however. i get the same or even better in linux, especially kde with much more options.

 

generally: i also prefer the glass look and many 3d effects. flat ui is rather boring and i expect it to be only a very short lasting trend.



#4 +Frank B.

Frank B.

    Member N° 1,302

  • 23,504 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 01
  • Location: Frankfurt, DE
  • OS: OS X 10.10
  • Phone: iPhone 6

Posted 07 August 2014 - 09:05

I'm in the 'I don't mind either way' camp. 

 

As long as it's not overdone like it used to be on Linux desktop (Compiz with all of its effects, anyone?) I don't see a problem with a translucent UI. I don't mind the flattened, non-translucent UI on the Windows 8.x desktop either though. 

 

What does bug me is inconsistency - e.g. how Windows 8 has a translucent task bar while the rest of the UI isn't translucent.



#5 OP +d5aqoëp

d5aqoëp

    Banned

  • 3,081 posts
  • Joined: 07-October 07

Posted 07 August 2014 - 10:23

What does bug me is inconsistency - e.g. how Windows 8 has a translucent task bar while the rest of the UI isn't translucent.

 
That bugged me as well. But consistency is not Microsoft's forté.

#6 +virtorio

virtorio

    4089 III

  • 8,363 posts
  • Joined: 28-April 03
  • Location: New Zealand
  • OS: OSX 10.9, Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy SIII

Posted 07 August 2014 - 10:25

I really liked the transparency in Aero Glass, but was well sick of it by the time Windows 8 came out. I don't like the transparent taskbar in Windows 8 and I really don't like the transparency in Yosemite (so I turned it off).



#7 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,812 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 07 August 2014 - 10:38

I believe in minimalist, non distracting UIs. Content should come first. I'm not at my computer to stare at glass or wallpapers all day.



#8 +InsaneNutter

InsaneNutter

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,685 posts
  • Joined: 15-March 03
  • Location: Yorkshire, England
  • OS: Windows 8.1 & OSX 10.9
  • Phone: OnePlus One

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:03

When done right, like in Windows 7 i think it looks really nice. As mentioned above though its horrible when taken to the extreme, like what can be done in Compiz.

#9 +Jack Unterweger

Jack Unterweger

    devoted fan of the us-armed forces

  • 3,090 posts
  • Joined: 19-January 03
  • OS: Snapshot-Linux x64 1149 0.3
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S3

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:07

When done right, like in Windows 7 i think it looks really nice. As mentioned above though its horrible when taken to the extreme, like what can be done in Compiz.

 

but that argument fails and has no logic. compiz offers more options, yes. but as the name says, these are options and dont have to be activated.

i prefer to have as many options as possible, than just little options and the os forcing it over me all the time and the only way to get more freedom is to buy shareware, eating away all your momory.

 

if i go and buy a car i also want to have the right to chose its color, engine, and in a list between as many extras as possible and i can say to each of it yes or no.

 

if consumers dont opt for choice the result is what we got with windows 8, which has even worse selling numbers than windows vista had!



#10 simplezz

simplezz

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,928 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 12

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:15

When done right, like in Windows 7 i think it looks really nice. As mentioned above though its horrible when taken to the extreme, like what can be done in Compiz.

That's the point. Can be done. Compiz and similar compositors are usually highly customisable. It's nice to have the choice IMO.

On the OP's question, yes, I like translucency / alpha compositing / compositing effects. It adds flavour to the UI and can make it very attractive. I'm just using the plain built-in XFCE compositor at the moment, but even that has a myriad of options, so I can customise it to my liking.

#11 BajiRav

BajiRav

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,657 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 04
  • Location: Xbox, where am I?
  • OS: Windows 8.1, Windows 8
  • Phone: Lumia 920

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:17

I'm in the 'I don't mind either way' camp.

As long as it's not overdone like it used to be on Linux desktop (Compiz with all of its effects, anyone?) I don't see a problem with a translucent UI. I don't mind the flattened, non-translucent UI on the Windows 8.x desktop either though.

What does bug me is inconsistency - e.g. how Windows 8 has a translucent task bar while the rest of the UI isn't translucent.


Can I come in the "don't care" corner?

#12 Scar

Scar

    Neowinian

  • 194 posts
  • Joined: 11-February 05
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Pro x64
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy SIII

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:37

I would love(though highly doubt) to see transparency return in a different/modern style.



#13 UXGaurav

UXGaurav

    Tried Classic Shell? It has 15 million+ downloads & growing

  • 3,931 posts
  • Joined: 18-October 05
  • Location: Windows
  • OS: Windows

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:41

Personally I like transparency as long as it doesn't affect readability or get in the way. I most certainly don't like plain opaque colors without any gradients - it's like the professional designers don't want to make any effort at all, even a kid can draw up colored rectangles in Paint. Aero Glass in Windows 7 was not plain transparency - it had blur and glow. So the glass areas of the shell such as Taskbar and Start Menu weren't completely unreadable if something appeared behind them.

 

Windows 8 removes these DWM effects. In Windows 8/8.1, the taskbar is too transparent. But it is always on top of most programs (except full-screen ones). The same is not true for the Start Menu. Anything can be behind the glass area of the Start Menu so it can't simply copy the taskbar's level of transluency. If you make the Start Menu the same, it becomes unreadable. Like this:

BmE_WKBCIAE4uS8.jpg:large

 

Start Menu replacements have a challenge on their hands. People expect the Start Menu to match the Taskbar color so its feels "native". There are 3 options: either make the taskbar fully opaque and the Start Menu opaque too (ugly but readable), reduce the Start Menu transluency (remains a mismatch from taskbar shade), or use unsupported methods to reduce transparency of both the taskbar as well as the Start Menu.

 

For Classic Shell, the default skin that ships with it on Windows 8 is far less transparent than the taskbar so it looks like a complete mismatch (ugly) but is readable. There is a separate downloadable skin that tries to be as transparent as possible without affecting readability too much (still doesn't exactly match the 8.1 taskbar but comes close, it doesn't stick out like a complete mismatch): http://winaero.com/b...aero-skin-2-0/.



#14 margrave

margrave

    Neowinian

  • 652 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 03

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:55

Open choice for the end user. Not hard set.



#15 +Majesticmerc

Majesticmerc

    Resident Idealist

  • 6,135 posts
  • Joined: 24-August 05
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • OS: Arch Linux / Win 7
  • Phone: HTC One X

Posted 07 August 2014 - 12:21

I like translucent effects personally. I think they can add subtlety to a UI that doesn't destract and basically makes it look professional.

Honestly, I don't like the look of the Windows 8.1 window manager. I don't think Aero glass needed to be removed for the Modern UI changes. If anything it would have enhanced it, as long as it was done right.