• 0

Loading different javascript depending on window size with if and else statements.


Question

So I am loading in different javascript depending on the screen width. The script is simple and works fine and loads the appropriate script depending on screen width. The problem is it only loads in the script depending on the original screen width. If i change my screen width to be smaller it doesn't change unless i refresh the page.

Anybody know of a simple fix? I am still pretty nooby with javascript.

Thanks!

Code im using: 

if ( $(window).width() > 1280) {
//Add your JavaScript for large screens here
}
else if( $(window).width() > 768) {
//Add your JavaScript for medium screens here
}

else ( $(window).width() > 439) {
//Add your JavaScript for small screens here
}

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Check out how it's done here, I use it and it works for me:

https://github.com/eddiemachado/bones/blob/master/library/js/scripts.js

In short you need to use:

$(window).resize(function () {     *your code here*}):
  • Like 1
  • 0

And if you have a lot of code depending for each of those cases you might consider using an AMD library like require.

$(window).resize(function () {     

if ($(window).width() > ...)
    require(...);
else if ($(window).width() > ...)
    require(...);

}):

That way people with a slower connection and probably fixed screen size (smartphones and tablets) don't need to load unnecessary javascript.

  • Like 1
  • 0
  On 15/09/2014 at 12:19, Brian M. said:

Loading javascript on resize is a bad idea.

 

What are you trying to accomplish? 

And why is that a bad idea? I have 3 interactive headers (phone, tablet, computer) made with Adobe Edge animate, and I just combine all their javascript files in one and set the screen width to each one.

 

All three files use the same resources, images, symbols, etc. So the user wouldn't be loading it all multiple times.

  • 0
  On 15/09/2014 at 05:46, Mieky242 said:

Check out how it's done here, I use it and it works for me:

https://github.com/eddiemachado/bones/blob/master/library/js/scripts.js

In short you need to use:

 

$(window).resize(function () {     *your code here*}):

 

 

  On 15/09/2014 at 06:23, XerXis said:

And if you have a lot of code depending for each of those cases you might consider using an AMD library like require.

$(window).resize(function () {     

if ($(window).width() > ...)
    require(...);
else if ($(window).width() > ...)
    require(...);

}):

That way people with a slower connection and probably fixed screen size (smartphones and tablets) don't need to load unnecessary javascript.

Cool!! Thank you guys!

  • 0
  On 15/09/2014 at 22:34, Veggie1232 said:

And why is that a bad idea?

Run this fiddle, and resize the browser window. You might be surprised how many times your resize function is being called.

http://jsfiddle.net/s1qt0ypf/1/

  • 0
  On 15/09/2014 at 22:47, Nik L said:

Your design is flawed if you have to load different resources such as JavaScript for different resolutions

 

(except for exceptional circumstances)

I am simply resizing the stage and repositioning elements in the stage (Stage is what you animate on in Adobe Edge animate) and depending on the screen size will reposition its elements and take in the stages width.

Seeing as its a personal project I doubt my method is "flawed" and taking in account my current understanding of javascript which is very little. I think this is fine. Unless you wana go over details on a better way. But simply telling me my way is flawed is counter productive to the problem.

  • 0

You should just need a single script to govern the animation of the elements regardless of the screen size, having multiple independent scripts that perform the same function but only differ in the input is sub-optimal (You need to keep them in sync, etc.).

  • 0
  On 16/09/2014 at 06:58, The_Decryptor said:

You should just need a single script to govern the animation of the elements regardless of the screen size, having multiple independent scripts that perform the same function but only differ in the input is sub-optimal (You need to keep them in sync, etc.).

 

In that case Ill see what I can do. Just gana start from scratch. Should be easier second time around now that I have a "rough draft" Sigh.. :(

  • 0
  Quote
Seeing as its a personal project I doubt my method is "flawed" and taking in account my current understanding of javascript which is very little. I think this is fine.

 

Your logic is also flawed.

  • 0
  On 17/09/2014 at 22:53, Nik L said:

Your logic is also flawed.

 

So you've told him his logic is flawed without offering any help... I don't get why you're bothering to post.  You aren't being constructive in any way at all. Either help him, or don't post... <Snip>

He's clearly stated his understandign of JS is minimal, and he's trying to learn and get some help.

 

Everyone else in this thread is giving him help with either the solution he's asking, OR, they're helping him in doing it the proper way.

  • 0
  On 17/09/2014 at 22:53, Nik L said:

Your logic is also flawed.

 

 

  On 18/09/2014 at 19:36, DeathLace said:

So you've told him his logic is flawed without offering any help... I don't get why you're bothering to post.  You aren't being constructive in any way at all. Either help him, or don't post... <Snip>

He's clearly stated his understandign of JS is minimal, and he's trying to learn and get some help.

 

Everyone else in this thread is giving him help with either the solution he's asking, OR, they're helping him in doing it the proper way.

I've got to agree with DeathLace. If someone is trying to learn, just telling them that they are wrong isn't helpful.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Clear Linux is open source, indeed, so its source code is available for anyone. They're just shutting down its support from them, they're not forbidding anyone else from taking over.
    • Linux Mint is also my favorite distro, but I fear what will happen with it if Clem were to disappear tomorrow, to be honest.
    • Yeah, I totally get your point, which is possible it could happen. I just hope there is a few people around him who are similar to where if they took over things would run pretty much the same. if not, then yeah, it could start to decline rapidly etc. but I figure something that's been around for a longer period of time with a decent backing, and probably more users than most Linux distro's (which I would 'imagine' Mint is one of the more used Linux desktop distro's by volume of people who use it), is less likely to just disappear. but like you said, nothing is guaranteed. but I do think you are probably right in that Clem is probably the core of what keeps Mint, Mint. I like how it tends to stay pretty much the same with some slight tweaks here and there (but is largely the same) instead of that crap some people go for with change for the sake of change trying to create a overly fancy interface and other unnecessary stuff etc. I also feel Mint keeps a nice balance of things out-of-the-box where it's not too bloated, nor too striped down. p.s. but I see Mint as a better Ubuntu basically. but I get your point like if it was more of a really serious choice of needing a 'safe bet' to use long term, then yeah something like official Ubuntu would be one of the better choices for sure given what you said with it being backed by an actual company which makes it a safer bet than Mint which is smaller and 'could' potentially be more fragile.
    • It’s in development so hopefully it’s improved upon before release.
    • For the 10th iteration they could have bothered with some design changes rather than just carrying over the 9's
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      leoniDAM earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Ian_ earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Ian_ earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      MacDaddyAz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Explorer
      cekicen went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      209
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      202
    4. 4
      Xenon
      146
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      121
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!