Two teachers accused of having

[Original Poster]

Punished for what? The teachers are seen as people in power and they are seen as breaking the law. Whether or not the boy was up for it or not, the teachers broke the law and the boy is considered the victim.  

 

if he filmed it he created child porn.... punish him for that?

 

he is not a victim, he is an accessory to this said crime. so what if they are seen as in power?

[dipsylalapo Supervisor]

if he filmed it he created child porn.... punish him for that?

 

he is not a victim, he is an accessory to this said crime. so what if they are seen as in power?

 

Then there are two crimes. The statutory rape and child porn. He may be charged with child porn charges but there is no question that he is the victim in the statutory rape crime, regardless of whether he wanted it or not.

[margrave]

Where were these kinds of teachers when I was in school..... dang....

[Xerxes]

Whether the age allows consent (Which it doesn't in this state at the very least), I believe it to still be illegal for a teacher to have this sort of relationship with one of their students;

 

I believe you are correct on that count. Here in Australia it's illegal to have any sort of relationship with a student, even friendship is pretty much frowned upon. It doesn't even need to be sexual, you get caught getting too close to a student and you're history.

[Tigurinn]

Where were these kinds of teachers when I was in school..... dang....

 

[game_over]

if he filmed it he created child porn.... punish him for that?

 

he is not a victim, he is an accessory to this said crime. so what if they are seen as in power?

 

It's pointless arguing with politically correct people, yes in the eyes of the law he is a victim but when common sense prevails it's obvious he is not a victim, he is, as you say, an accessory to a crime.. 

 

I don't see anything sick or twisted in this, like some perverted guy who prey's on young girls, men and woman are different, woman don't think like that, it's probably some harmless fun that went wrong... as i said in my earlier post, i bet this goes on quite often here in the UK and nothing become of it because there are no victims... teachers are younger these days, youngsters mature quicker physically and emotionally these days.. the laws should be changed to reflect that...They should be thrown out of their jobs and thats it.

[Lenny Bruce]

Idiot teachers. 'Nuff said.

[cork1958]

At 16, not only would I be coming to the defense of these teachers, I would kick the ###### out of whichever one of my buddies told. Of course it would be different if it were two male teachers and a 16-year old girl. Life isn't fair.

 

Pretty much exactly what I think! :)

 

Any dude in the world would've loved to have been in this situation, unless he's gay, but that's irrelevant.

 

Most definitely life isn't fair and with the double standards in the way a lot of people think, it's definitely not right either.

 

I KNOW this isn't right and is flat out against the law, but sheesh, sure would've loved to have been that kid!! :)

[dipsylalapo Supervisor]

It's pointless arguing with politically correct people, yes in the eyes of the law he is a victim but when common sense prevails it's obvious he is not a victim, he is, as you say, an accessory to a crime.. 

 

I don't see anything sick or twisted in this, like some perverted guy who prey's on young girls, men and woman are different, woman don't think like that, it's probably some harmless fun that went wrong... as i said in my earlier post, i bet this goes on quite often here in the UK and nothing become of it because there are no victims... teachers are younger these days, youngsters mature quicker physically and emotionally these days.. the laws should be changed to reflect that...They should be thrown out of their jobs and thats it.

 

See my post, there are two crimes. Yes it may not be common sense but the law is the law, you'd be have to have a great argument to overturn the law. Just saying. 

 

And your second point - sexist much! Just because it's a guy they have to be perverts? If the situation was reversed with exactly the same ages, it's suddenly that the man is a pervert? To me, something does not sound right there.

[Ice_Blue]

So I guess the gleesome threesome now consists of a gruesome twosome and a lonesome onesome.

[MorganX]

Pretty much exactly what I think! :)

 

Any dude in the world would've loved to have been in this situation, unless he's gay, but that's irrelevant.

 

Most definitely life isn't fair and with the double standards in the way a lot of people think, it's definitely not right either.

 

I KNOW this isn't right and is flat out against the law, but sheesh, sure would've loved to have been that kid!! :)

 

Yeah, I feel bad about how I feel too. With girls, underage is underage. When it comes to sexuality men and women are not equal. Human nature is what it is and girls are generally sexualized and easily dominated and abused at all ages.

 

This case is dangerous and the younger the boy is it's just as damaging to young boys as it is to girls, but with boys I think there should be exceptions in cases like this. The age being 16, females teachers being decent looking with one pretty hot. If the victim is happy ... making an exception is a dangerous slippery slope though. At the end of the day, it is probably best to prosecute across the board, the law is the law.

[HeartsOfWar]

LOL! So, any boy who has had sex in their 16's is scarred for life now? Jesus...

 

To the people screaming rape.

 

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rape

 

Key word is "FORCED".

 

You took my quote and completely blew it out of context: A minor subjected to a sexual encounter with someone other than a peer where there was an obvious power disparity. Yes, they could have pyschological damage that may last a lifetime, even if they were hot for it and 16. It may not manifest itself in a way you think is important, but it is possible. Do I honestly think this kid is scarred for life? No... but that doesn't mean the next won't be. I dated a 21 yr. old when I was 17 and turned out perfectly fine. I have some damn good memories too, but that doesn't mean I have to be some stark raving sex hungry macho male shouting, "yuck yuck... where was she when I was a student. huhuhuhuuhuh fire fire huhuuhhh HOT FOR TEACHER!".

[Active.]

I don't see anything sick or twisted in this, like some perverted guy who prey's on young girls, men and woman are different, woman don't think like that, it's probably some harmless fun that went wrong... 

Sure. When it's a woman it must be "harmless fun" but when it's a man it's sick, twisted and perverted. Of course it doesn't have to necessarily be "sick, twisted and perverted" in either case, but I got news for you, there are some seriously sick, twisted and perverted men and  women out there.   :ermm:

[123456789A]

There are many problems with just sweeping it under the rug...

 

1. While the minor may think it's cool or perfectly fine right now, they may not feel that way when they've fully matured. Males generally don't reach peak maturity until well into their 20s (mid 20s) while women reach peak around 18-20.

 

18-20 is peak maturity for a woman?

[game_over]

See my post, there are two crimes. Yes it may not be common sense but the law is the law, you'd be have to have a great argument to overturn the law. Just saying. 

 

And your second point - sexist much! Just because it's a guy they have to be perverts? If the situation was reversed with exactly the same ages, it's suddenly that the man is a pervert? To me, something does not sound right there.

 

It's not sexist, it's just the way it is... men and won are different, accept it.

[Memphis]

It's not sexist, it's just the way it is... men and won are different, accept it.

Your right they are different, but you have yet to back up that that they differ on this particular subject.

[Original Poster]

It's pointless arguing with politically correct people, yes in the eyes of the law he is a victim but when common sense prevails it's obvious he is not a victim, he is, as you say, an accessory to a crime.. 

 

I don't see anything sick or twisted in this, like some perverted guy who prey's on young girls, men and woman are different, woman don't think like that, it's probably some harmless fun that went wrong... as i said in my earlier post, i bet this goes on quite often here in the UK and nothing become of it because there are no victims... teachers are younger these days, youngsters mature quicker physically and emotionally these days.. the laws should be changed to reflect that...They should be thrown out of their jobs and thats it.

i pretty much agree

[wakjak]

If this situation were reversed, you'd all be feeling terrible for the "poor girl" who got "raped/abused" but since it's a guy he gets the old pat on the back and a good job from the crowd.. pathetic... absolutely ****ing pathetic.

[T3X4S]

I went to the wrong school, at the wrong time.

[FloatingFatMan]

If this situation were reversed, you'd all be feeling terrible for the "poor girl" who got "raped/abused" but since it's a guy he gets the old pat on the back and a good job from the crowd.. pathetic... absolutely ****ing pathetic.

 

I wouldn't, not if its consensual, which this 100% was.

[game_over]

Your right they are different, but you have yet to back up that that they differ on this particular subject.

 

How many woman are in the news for raping (and possibly killing) young boys? How many men are in the news for raping young girls? I'm just basing it on facts.. I'm 28 and the only instances i've seen in my life time when woman are involved are when there is a man involved as well usually pulling the strings... a guy would jump at the chance, a young girl wouldn't.

[DocM]

How many woman are in the news for raping (and possibly killing) young boys? - How many men are in the news for raping young girls?

We're talking statutory rape in this case, not aggravated or forcible rape. Two different things, with statutory not requiring force. The target is someone too young to legally consent, but willing.

I'm just basing it on facts.. I'm 28 and the only instances i've seen in my life time when woman are involved are when there is a man involved as well usually pulling the strings... a guy would jump at the chance, a young girl wouldn't.

There are not as many female sociopaths as male, the ratio is about 1:7, but the number is definitely no-zero. Their need for control is similar but they manifest differently. Rape is always about control, violent or not. Young lovers are easy to control using sex.