Bill Gates Faces Trial in India for Illegally Testing Tribal Children with Vaccines


Recommended Posts

I stumbled upon this article: http://www.globalresearch.ca/bill-gates-faces-trial-in-india-for-illegally-testing-tribal-children-with-vaccines/5407864

That article accuses BIll Gates & Melinda Foundation conducting illegal testing of experimental Human Papiloma Virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil & Cervarix.

 

Consent forms to administer the HPV vaccine were ?illegally? signed by wardens form youth hostels,

showing that the Gates? prey on the indigent without parents.

For those who had parents, most were illiterate, and the true potential dangers of the vaccines were not explained to them.

 

related articles:

http://vactruth.com/2014/10/05/bill-gates-vaccine-crimes/

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-vaccine-empire-on-trial-in-india/

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-31/news/53413161_1_hpv-vaccine-cervarix-human-papilloma-virus

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Targeting the poor is nothing new. Every medicine or vaccine out there has been tested first in poor countries before it is out to the developed countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The source website also posts articles such as:

They seem to have an agenda and lots of conspiracy stories so I'll take this news article with a grain of salt..

Yeah, it seems they pick that story because it suit their style.

 

But even without that site, Gardasil itself are known to be controversial.

 

Sample case from Kansas:

http://www.kmbc.com/news/teen-suffers-health-problems-after-receiving-hpv-vaccine/20228464

 

Even more serious case of Gardasil happens in Australia, 16 yrs old girl went into menopause! because of Gardasil vaccines.

http://naturalsociety.com/gardasil-vaccine-16-year-old-infertile/

 

 

One of the most recent stories detailing evidence of Gardasil?s potential harm comes to us from Australia. Published in the British Medical Journal, this case study involves a 16-year old girl who received the Gardasil vaccine. Soon after, and with prior normal menstruation and overall health, the girl went into menopause, destroying any future hope of having children.

 

Following the incident, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)?Australia?s equivalent of the FDA?found that Merck failed to ever test the vaccine on potential negative effects to women?s ovaries. While they had tested the vaccine on the testes of male rats, they either forgot or completely neglected to test it on ovaries.

 

And yet, BMGF continue to administering that vaccines?

are BMGF becoming the Big Pharma's stooges to test potentialy harmful vaccine/medicine in 3rd world contries??

 

Surely Bill should know that 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves within a year, and within 2 years the percentage climbs to 90%?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it seems they pick that story because it suit their style.

 

But even without that site, Gardasil itself are known to be controversial.

 

Sample case from Kansas:

http://www.kmbc.com/news/teen-suffers-health-problems-after-receiving-hpv-vaccine/20228464

 

Even more serious case of Gardasil happens in Australia, 16 yrs old girl went into menopause! because of Gardasil vaccines.

http://naturalsociety.com/gardasil-vaccine-16-year-old-infertile/

 

 

 

And yet, BMGF continue to use that vaccines??

 

Surely Bill should know that 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves within a year, and within 2 years the percentage climbs to 90%.

 

out of millions of people who's taken the vaccine and been saved from other diseases form the vaccine, we're going to claim it's bad because these two person have gotten a reaction that may be from the vaccine 

 

;)

 

yeah...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Surely Bill should know that 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves within a year, and within 2 years the percentage climbs to 90%.

 

 

yea, but the HPV vaccine is because some HPV viruses can cause cancer.  that's why people take theHPV vaccine, not for the infection. 

 

if you're going to talk about the vaccine, you should know what it's for ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

out of millions of people who's taken the vaccine and been saved from other diseases form the vaccine, we're going to claim it's bad because these two person have gotten a reaction that may be from the vaccine 

 

;)

 

yeah...

actually it not just 'two' as you suggest, there actually more:

 

this is report in 2011: http://naturalsociety.com/3-girls-dead-others-hospitalized-after-gardasil-hpv-vaccine/

 

Following controversy over U.S. state legislatures requiring young girls to take Gardasil, Merck?s vaccine for human papillomavirus (HPV),

a number of severe side effects have been observed along with the recent deaths of 3 young girls.

Gardasil is now marketed towards men and women up to age 26 as a ?preventative? tool against anal cancer. As of January 2010, Gardasil has been linked to 49 deaths and countless side-effects,

while cancer associated with HPV is only responsible for 1% of all cancer deaths.

heck even ONE death because of vaccine are already TOO much.

Proper vaccine are not supposed to causing death to those who receives it.

 

again with all these controversial surrounding the vaccine, BMGF continue trying to administer them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually it not just 'two' as you suggest, there actually more:

 

this is report in 2011: http://naturalsociety.com/3-girls-dead-others-hospitalized-after-gardasil-hpv-vaccine/

 

heck even ONE death because of vaccine are already TOO much.

Proper vaccine are not supposed to causing death to those who receives it.

 

again with all these controversial surrounding the vaccine, BMGF continue trying to administer them...

 

You bolded the counterargument to your own statement. There were 576000 deaths related to cancer in 2010. If 1% of those were due to HPV, the math is clearly in favor of the vaccine (assuming of course that it does prevent cancer). Obviously we shouldn't stop researching better solutions, but for now it's better than hoping you don't get cancer.

 

At any rate this seems like a pretty weak attempt to discredit everything the foundation has done for everyone on this planet and what it will continue to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eems like a pretty weak attempt to discredit everything the foundation ...

BMGF could use their resources for other diseases that have proper & proven vaccines, but they didn't,

they insist testing Gardasil & Cervarix to those can't understand the risk they would undergoes to.

Consent forms to administer the HPV vaccine were ?illegally? signed by wardens form youth hostels,

showing that the Gates? prey on the indigent without parents.

For those who had parents, most were illiterate, and the true potential dangers of the vaccines were not explained to them.

 

So I ask again, have BMGF turned into Big Pharma's henchmen to test their dangerous Vaccine/Medicine to gullible masses in 3rd world countries??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually it not just 'two' as you suggest, there actually more:

 

this is report in 2011: http://naturalsociety.com/3-girls-dead-others-hospitalized-after-gardasil-hpv-vaccine/

 

heck even ONE death because of vaccine are already TOO much.

Proper vaccine are not supposed to causing death to those who receives it.

 

again with all these controversial surrounding the vaccine, BMGF continue trying to administer them...

 

 

Would you rather 100+ die from the disease or 1 person may be sick from the vaccine.

 

How many would be dead today if we listened to the anti vaccine people and stopped vaccinating all the deadly childhood disease that killed and/or crippled hundreds of thousands ever year and are virtually eradicated now, except in third world countries AND in colonies of anti vaccine extremists...

BMGF have saved hundreds of thousands probably millions with their vaccines, but medina by its nature isn't perfect since humans are diverse and not perfect. The amount they saved outnumbers the people with adverse effects far more than 1000 to 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heck even ONE death because of vaccine are already TOO much.

 

While "do no harm" is an admirable goal for all types of medications and vaccines, it's simply not a realistic one. Only a handful of people die every year from reactions to vaccines, while over 2.5 million die from vaccine-preventable deaths like measles, influenza, rotavirus and pertussis. Right now, out here in Los Angeles we're having a mini-epidemic of whooping cough in wealthy areas of LA county because parents are refusing to vaccinate their kids, and not surprisingly, they're getting sick.

 

No drug or vaccine is risk-free. But an important thing to keep in mind is that vaccines are about "protecting the herd" if you will. Getting vaccinated is as much about helping to protect others from disease as it is about protecting yourself. Of course, it's a terrible thing if your child gets sick, or even dies as the result of a bad reaction to a vaccine (or any kind of medication). But statistically, the risks incurred by choosing to not vaccinate your child are significantly worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I found some other articles, the protection against HPV are not much better than Flu Vaccine.

This article said, Gardasil only protect against 4 types of HPV out of 100 known HPV types.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/01/24/hpv-vaccine-victim-sues-merck.aspx

 

And death rate because of HPV are about 3 death per 100,000 who was infected.

Not much protection offered by Gardasil, but its usages carries enough high side-effect.

And you still susceptible to other HPV types even when you takes the HPV vaccine.

 

Even Japan drop HPV vaccines from being 'recommended' due to the severity of HPV Vaccine side-effect.

http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-japan-demonstrates-their-commitment-to-vaccine-safety/

 

So, I started to question what exactly motivated the BMGF when they decided to conduct Gardasil/Cervarix 'illegal' testing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Targeting the poor is nothing new. Every medicine or vaccine out there has been tested first in poor countries before it is out to the developed countries.

 

Sad but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BMGF could use their resources for other diseases that have proper & proven vaccines, but they didn't,

they insist testing Gardasil & Cervarix to those can't understand the risk they would undergoes to.

 

 

 

So I ask again, have BMGF turned into Big Pharma's henchmen to test their dangerous Vaccine/Medicine to gullible masses in 3rd world countries??

 

What? They do use their resources for a great many vaccines and diseases :rolleyes: You still haven't given any proof that we're worse off with the vaccine than without. All you're talking up is pretty standard anti-vaxxer drivel that I quite frankly don't have any respect for, nor any patience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that Gates is some kind of humanitarian is pure fiction and PR. He's in bed with Monsanto and Big Pharma, pushing dangerous GM foods and dubious drugs onto the third world. While at the same time advocating the privatisation of education in the first world. Quite sickening really.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that Gates is some kind of humanitarian is pure fiction and PR. He's in bed with Monsanto and Big Pharma, pushing dangerous GM foods and dubious drugs onto the third world. While at the same time advocating the privatisation of education in the first world. Quite sickening really.

Your post oozes jealousy and contempt.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I found some other articles, the protection against HPV are not much better than Flu Vaccine.

This article said, Gardasil only protect against 4 types of HPV out of 100 known HPV types.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/01/24/hpv-vaccine-victim-sues-merck.aspx

 

And death rate because of HPV are about 3 death per 100,000 who was infected.

Not much protection offered by Gardasil, but its usages carries enough high side-effect.

And you still susceptible to other HPV types even when you takes the HPV vaccine.

 

Even Japan drop HPV vaccines from being 'recommended' due to the severity of HPV Vaccine side-effect.

http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-japan-demonstrates-their-commitment-to-vaccine-safety/

 

So, I started to question what exactly motivated the BMGF when they decided to conduct Gardasil/Cervarix 'illegal' testing?

 

But they protect against the main cancer ones, and if you limit your statistics to just those for a realistic and proper comparison instead of including all the non dangerous ones it's not designed to protect against you get a much better result. Instead of one tailored to show a specific result.

The idea that Gates is some kind of humanitarian is pure fiction and PR. He's in bed with Monsanto and Big Pharma, pushing dangerous GM foods and dubious drugs onto the third world. While at the same time advocating the privatisation of education in the first world. Quite sickening really.

 

Show actual proof before dragging people who's saved millions into the dirt because you dont like the OS he helped makes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they protect against the main cancer ones, ... Instead of one tailored to show a specific result.

.. really HawkMan, certainly you haven't read the article I linked properly.

 

What BMGF do with Gardasil/Cervarix testing IS tailored for specific result. At this point I can only speculates that might have something to do with Big Pharmas.

 

If you actually bothered to read the article properly, you'll find better way to protect against HPV cancers.

 

Certain types of chronic HPV infections,

which are not identified or treated for a long time, can lead to cervical cancer.

 

It is only when the HPV virus lingers for many years that abnormal cervical cells could turn into cancer.

This is why PAP smears identify cervical changes and can prevent cervical cancer deaths far more effectively than the HPV vaccine ever will,

because there's a sufficient amount of time to find and treat any cervical abnormalities if you're getting regular PAP smears.

 

Better course for BMGF to take than that controversial vaccine testing:

* Setup facilities that host equipments for PAP smear, this can be at schools / university / clinic / workplaces / etc, preferably if this easy to access.

* Provides training for local staff to operate & maintain the equipments.

* Provides education, understanding and the importance for locals in that area so they would do the PAP smears at regular interval.

* Also provide means about what to do, when PAP smears result indication of possible cancers.

 

Considering untreated HPV would takes years before it develops into dangerous cancer but already shows symptom even at first year since infection,

and its perfectly cureable, especially if those at early signs for faster treatment.

 

That a lot better than doing some experimental vaccine testing.

 

 

All you're talking up is pretty standard anti-vaxxer drivel that I quite frankly don't have any respect for, nor any patience.

Should you read my previous post you'll know that i'm not against vaccine there are other proven & proper vaccines out there and those real vaccine really help mankind.

 

What I'm against is that controversial vaccines that have known severe & permanent side-effects and that 'dubious vaccine' need lobbying from Big Pharma to became mandatory for other to receive it.

 

And what saddening is, foundation like BMGF try to shoved such controversial vaccines into the third world countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Targeting the poor is nothing new. Every medicine or vaccine out there has been tested first in poor countries before it is out to the developed countries.

 

a lot of time it is the poor countries where most of the medicine is needed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.