BTRFS vs EXT4 file system


Recommended Posts

Regarding a new Opensuse 13.2 install...I ran across TweakHound's writeup on this subject and it's left me with the obvious question.

 

Now, he makes it perfectly clear he is not an expert, and I am even less so, but I do think I understand his point. I want this next install once my newly ordered laptop arrives, to be "permanent"...so I'm hoping for some insight.

 

As always, thanks for replies and knowledge sharing. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest advantage from what I read about it is resistance from bit rot/file corruption, a trick I wish NTFS would pick up at some point. I personally haven't run into the problem, but as my data grows larger, so does the possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

btrfs is "better", but not as mature as ext4 (Because it's based off ext3). If you keep backups you'll be fine, but there aren't many tools (last I checked) that could repair btrfs in case of an error.

You can do a online conversion from ext4 to brtfs iirc, so you can change if you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points both. I'll only be maintaining about 100Gb of material, not much by some standards, but it's important to me. I'd like to be able to easily repair corrupt data if it happens. Regular backups will be a regular routine too.

 

I might be wrong on this one, but I also tend to equate maturity with stability. If that's the case, EXT4 "should" be more stable, but BTRFS resistance to corruption may balance that out?

 

Thanks again for the help folks..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

afair btrfs let's you keep several versions of a file and makes it easy to restore the one you need. performance maybe not yet on ext4 level though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.